Re: Poker Night Live!

Hey Folks,
I have just registered myself onto the Forum after talking about with Devon (All_Aces). I will be the other commentator, sharing the privilege with Devon on Poker Night Live. We will be alternating nights and it looks like it will be a pretty good show. I look forward to comments or questions from some of you, whether through the show or on the forum. I might know some of you, or have played with some of you already. I have many nicknames, but most know me as "Johnny T", as that is actually my name. My user name will be omega 23, for less than obvious reasons. Anyhow, got to go. I will be in touch.
Johnny T
«1345678

Comments

  • very cool. Good luck with the show and be sure to come back and tell us all about it.
  • Welcome to the forum! I'm excited to tune in and see you two work your magic.

    stp
  • Welcome Johnny... it's pretty funny actually that I got to know you during meetings and rehearsal days, and we host the same show, but we will never work with each other.  I look forward to sitting across the felt from you, though, and watching your episodes of PNL.
  • Hey Devo

    What happend to Tina on PNL? Last couple of shows they've had a new host.


    Hobbes
  • Hobbes wrote:
    Hey Devo

      What happend to Tina on PNL? Last couple of shows they've had a new host.


    Hobbes

    Yeah I was wondering the same thing, I caught the last 1/2 hour last night and there was a different host with Johnny
  • I also saw a European lady as an expert on one of the shows last week. I'm not saying I could do a better job than her or anything but she's not yet at Devon's or JohnnyT's level. Also, Tina was looking extra hot that night...for some reason. :D

    stp
  • LOL Shannon...

    Here's the deal: the extra "expert"... Audrey I believe... was brought in to help fill some scheduling gaps.  I will be doing Canadian Idol again this summer, among other things, so I can only do one or two nights/week at PNL, tops.  I also imagine that they like the variety.

    The other host is named Gail.  She was brought in for much the same reason... Tina is still the "main" host of PNL, and will continue to be.  Talking about poker for 2 hours straight gets tiring though, and I only do it 2 or 3 nights a week.  Tina's never complained... in fact I think she loves doing the show, but we can all use a bit of a break sometimes.

    I haven't seen any of the "Gail" shows, but I think I'm doing one with her next week.  It should be fun... interesting that's for sure.  If you're talking to someone for two hours, it's good to have some kind of a connection... hopefully we can have some laughs.

    I've seen about 5 minutes of an Audrey show.
  • dude, Johnny T, you seem like an alright guy, but I think you need to brush up on your odds work a little, you're giving out a lot of wrong information, I only watched tonights show for about 30-40 mins and there was a few glaring errors, e.g.

    77 vs. 88 an 8-1 underdog preflop (obviously it's 4 to 1)
    3 outs having a 12% chance of hitting on the turn card (in fact its the TURN or the RIVER)
    12% being 9-1 underdog (it's actually less than 7.5 to 1)

    I'm constantly noticing things like this on your episodes, and I don't mean to bust your balls, but the information/advice you are giving is just plain wrong.
  • 77 vs. 88 an 8-1 underdog preflop (obviously it's 4 to 1)

    You sure he wasn't saying that 77 is 8:1 against flopping a set?
  • all_aces wrote:
    77 vs. 88 an 8-1 underdog preflop (obviously it's 4 to 1)

    You sure he wasn't saying that 77 is 8:1 against flopping a set?

    77 went all in preflop, before he got called by 88 Johnny T said "he's going to be an 8:1 underdog".

    Understandable to get mixed up, but he doesn't correct himself, and people assumedly listen to this "expert" commentary to learn.
  • all_aces wrote:
    77 vs. 88 an 8-1 underdog preflop (obviously it's 4 to 1)

    You sure he wasn't saying that 77 is 8:1 against flopping a set?

    77 went all in preflop, before he got called by 88 Johnny T said "he's going to be an 8:1 underdog".

    Understandable to get mixed up, but he doesn't correct himself, and people assumedly listen to this "expert" commentary to learn.

    Once again, JT not an expert, not even a winning player. He's a nice guy though.
  • GTA poker should host the show.

    all in favour?
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    all_aces wrote:
    77 vs. 88 an 8-1 underdog preflop (obviously it's 4 to 1)

    You sure he wasn't saying that 77 is 8:1 against flopping a set?

    77 went all in preflop, before he got called by 88 Johnny T said "he's going to be an 8:1 underdog".

    Understandable to get mixed up, but he doesn't correct himself, and people assumedly listen to this "expert" commentary to learn.

    Once again, JT not an expert, not even a winning player. He's a nice guy though.

    maybe they should consider somebody else for the job...
  • He's an actor an that's how he got the job. He plays poker, but he's not necessarily a winning player. That's not to say that he doesn't know things about poker or isn't qualified to host a poker tv show. I would assume that most hosts of poker tv shows aren't winning poker players.
  • To say hes not a winning poker player is bold comment, winning at poker is not like winning the lotery anyone who puts enough time reading books and learning the game can make money at poker.
  • I'm not sure when this turned into a debate on how good JohnnyT is at....anything but fwiw I think he does a damn fine job at hosting the show, as does Devon. They've both really improved since the start of the show.

    On a side note, I was pretty sure I heard Devon say on air that "he wasn't trying to be a dick or anything" in reference to a conversation that him and Tina were having. I laughed out loud, yes LOL. It was surprising to hear....Are they cool with you saying something like that?

    stp
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    I would assume that most hosts of poker tv shows aren't winning poker players.
    Ahem.

    And, on behalf of Mr. Sharf, ahem.  And Jim "KrazyKanuck" Worth.  And Mike Sexton.  Phil Gordon too, and I guess Phil Hellmuth now that he's taking over for Phil Gordon.
    stpboy wrote:
    On a side note, I was pretty sure I heard Devon say on air that "he wasn't trying to be a dick or anything" in reference to a conversation that him and Tina were having. I laughed out loud, yes LOL. It was surprising to hear....Are they cool with you saying something like that?

    stp

    Yep, you heard me say that, on Wednesday night IIRC.

    I think I'm allowed to say "dick", "bitch" (in the context of "I'm not going to bitch about it", or "that's a bitch"), "piss", "damn", etc.  I'm just going by my own guidelines of what the public can handle, though... I wasn't given a list of do's and don'ts or anything.
  • stpboy wrote:
    I'm not sure when this turned into a debate on how good JohnnyT is at....anything but fwiw I think he does a damn fine job at hosting the show, as does Devon. They've both really improved since the start of the show.

    On a side note, I was pretty sure I heard Devon say on air that "he wasn't trying to be a dick or anything" in reference to a conversation that him and Tina were having. I laughed out loud, yes LOL. It was surprising to hear....Are they cool with you saying something like that?

    stp

    It started when I made comments about errors Johnny T was making on air. I agree that he does a good job hosting, and his personality seems well suited to the job, but I have a problem with him telling viewers stuff that is just plain wrong.
  • oh man, the cohost last night.. i don't know if it was a repeat or not, but I had to turn it off after 10 minutes (i tuned in shortly after the second sng started)

    was that audrey?
  • Hello folks,
    This is Johnny T here and I am writing in my own defense and as a response to some of the comments I have been reading. I do appreciate that you all have been watching the show and I have taken note of some of the comments. It is true that in the last couple of shows I have made a couple of mistakes. I would not generalize and say that I always do - the last couple have been a little more difficult than previous. THe new host that I am working with is great, a lovely young lady - but not that talkative -especially about poker. There has been added pressure for me to speak and in the last couple shows it feels like I am moving so fast that I can't keep up with myself. I am confident that Gail will quickly adapt and give me some time to think by filling in time. It will be easier for me to come up with the correct answer. THe three outs 12% to hit it on the turn is a minor mistake (I obviously meant turn and river - cut me some slack) but the 88vs77 was a mind cramp. I was calculating the odds for 77 to hit a set. Sorry for the error, but please don't generalize and say that I always do this - I don't. The only calculations I do make is intended to help beginner players get a GENERAL idea of how to calculate odds - not for the mathematician - ie(count outs on flop - multiply by 4 for turn and river, count outs on turn multiply by 2 for river) I do tell viewers that this is a rough, but usable way to calculate odds and then to look at the size of the pot. Generally good info that has been a big reason for my success. Which brings me to my second defense - I am a winning player Daviedoe (GTA). I have played with GTA only a handfull of times, most of which was over a year ago and playing 4-8) I won't say how much, but I walk away with a solid profit between 70-75% playing limit and 40-40% playing tournament. This is based on my poker log book in which I record my losses and winnings. I am percieved by many to be a losing player or a bad player because I often will seem to play loose at times, or rimjob someone on the river knowing I had the odds to call (most of the time) and I am judged by this. Don't care really, it's my pocket bulge that keeps me satisfied (no - not that bulge). ANyhow, hope this clears some things up. And my apologies for the first half of the last show. I didn't know what the hell was going on and I was sweating my balls off in that sauna of a studio.
    Omega23
  • I should add that my poker log dates back to November of 2004. Before that I can't say for sure but I was a losing player at 4-8 - the game I initally was introduced into the poker world with back in 2002. That has since changed - but I do prefer higher stakes games now, but have recently got my head around the 4-8 game (last 3 months). Reading Sklansky's Small Stakes Hold'em is big reason for that and I highly recommend it for low-stakes players.
  • hey man, I did initially over-react because it was quite a few things in a short period of time, I didnt mean to say you always do this, and usually when it does happens, it's minor stuff, I apologize and I can be sympathetic to the fact that the recent co-host gives you no "thinking time". Sorry if I came off as a dick, just some observations. Like I said, you do a great job personality wise and overall I enjoy the show. Quick note though, the 12% and 3 outs is a very common mistake that people make when they first hear of the 4 and 2 rule, which is why I think it's important to stress the fact that it is for 2 cards, not 12% to hit on turn and 6% to hit on river, which is how it is commonly mis-explained.
  • all_aces wrote:
    GTA Poker wrote:
    I would assume that most hosts of poker tv shows aren't winning poker players.
    Ahem.

    And, on behalf of Mr. Sharf, ahem. And Jim "KrazyKanuck" Worth. And Mike Sexton. Phil Gordon too, and I guess Phil Hellmuth now that he's taking over for Phil Gordon.
    stpboy wrote:
    On a side note, I was pretty sure I heard Devon say on air that "he wasn't trying to be a dick or anything" in reference to a conversation that him and Tina were having. I laughed out loud, yes LOL. It was surprising to hear....Are they cool with you saying something like that?

    stp

    Yep, you heard me say that, on Wednesday night IIRC.

    I think I'm allowed to say "dick", "bitch" (in the context of "I'm not going to bitch about it", or "that's a bitch"), "piss", "damn", etc. I'm just going by my own guidelines of what the public can handle, though... I wasn't given a list of do's and don'ts or anything.

    Ok, what I meant was that with the abundance of poker shows on television that you can't assume that any given host/commentator is a winning player just because he is speaking about poker on television. Kind of like the fact that something isn't necessarily true just because it is in writing. Obviously, I wasn't referring to the name winning pros, but to some of the hosts of smaller events and smaller-scale poker shows.

    I did add the word necessarily to my original comment as that is how I meant to state things originally, but I don't reread posts prior to posting and that was meant to be the spirit of my original post.
  • rimjob someone on the river

    At least there's water around for you to rinse with.

    And yeah, they gotta get that a/c working on the weekends too.

    I've said it on this forum many times Johnny my boy... you do a great job on the show.  And with the number of words leaving our mouths in the space of two hours, it's not surprising that we make the occasional error.
  • all_aces wrote:
    rimjob someone on the river

    At least there's water around for you to rinse with.

    And yeah, they gotta get that a/c working on the weekends too.

    I've said it on this forum many times Johnny my boy... you do a great job on the show. And with the number of words leaving our mouths in the space of two hours, it's not surprising that we make the occasional error.

    fair enough, the difference I find is that when you, Devon, make a mistake, you tend to correct yourself so people don't get the wrong idea. I over-reacted to the small errors I did see as it was late and I was so surprised at them.
  • Hey folks,
    I have now had a chance to read all the reactions and I hope I didn't come off like a badger that's been cornered. I am glad you all are fans of the show and I will be more careful to correct myself if it comes to mind and to be mindful of my calculations. I really do appreciate your constructive criticism and the enthusiasm you all have for the game. I hope we get the chance to play together one of these days. Devo, you are the man baby!
    Johnny T
  • omega23 wrote:
    Hey folks,
    I have now had a chance to read all the reactions and I hope I didn't come off like a badger that's been cornered. I am glad you all are fans of the show and I will be more careful to correct myself if it comes to mind and to be mindful of my calculations. I really do appreciate your constructive criticism and the enthusiasm you all have for the game. I hope we get the chance to play together one of these days. Devo, you are the man baby!
    Johnny T

    Once again, I want to say that my post was not meant to be negative towards JT. All I meant to say is that if you see someone hosting a poker show on TV it does not mean that the person is a winning player. I don't know if JT is a winning player or not and I have stated before that his game is noticably stronger than when I first played with him almost 2 years ago.

    Plus he has some pretty neat hair.
  • I have to give respect to both Johnny T, Devo, Tina and the rest of the PNL crew for keeping the show flowing.

    They have to basically make the comments "on the fly" and keep the show moving.

    They don't have a chance to go to the studio and edit some of the commentary out or change it, for them to keep the show flowing at a good pace has to take a lot of work so we can all forgive the unusual comment every now and again.
  • All the hosts do a great job, just remember the "LIVE" part of PNL.

    Very difficult to think on your feet with millions watching.... :D

    Hobbes
  • Last night on PNL there was a guy named Wifesab1tch. Tina almost said it once. I was laughing my head off.
Sign In or Register to comment.