Confirmed!

15681011

Comments

  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Why does society have to be all inclusive? Do philatelic groups have to welcome numismatics with open arms?
    This is the topic isn't it, I think you have done some incredible with this post. You nailed it. And I think it isn't my answer that is the law here. But you are really asking about the economics of different types of currencies and how the markets should interact with each other.

    Stamps have an important history when it comes to understanding economics which is essentially a form of explaining and understanding the history and future of mankind.

    How should this things interact and what should their relation be? Should we extract our strategy from viewing the difference between philatelic and numismatic groups? Or is it that our strategies change by the simply process of observing their interactions with each other without any misplaced axioms involved.

    Is our collective intellect free enough to judge and decide, or should we first attempt a collective process of unbiased observation?
  • Startles wrote: »
    ........

    I started a post asking for clarification on your absurd rebuttal but then came to my senses. As I did with darbday you are now blocked.

    I guess I'm guilty of hating and segregating....your bullshit.
  • I'm back from dinner, so how is everyone, and did you all play nice? I see the place didn't implode so I guess wildbill did a good job in my absence..

    ah, so friendly around here... Isn't so nice and calm..






    now, back to discussion at hand, what was it anyways, feds scam, bad morals, darbs background, bitcoin, where the h*** were we ?

  • I guess I'm guilty of hating and segregating....your bullshit.
    He IS guilty of it, admits it, and it is clear to see...

    Also guilty of being a proponent of my segregation...

    which is interesting because the reason was that I was a "duck", and by duck he means anti semite. Which is someone that wants the segregation (or destruction) of a certain group of peoples, which is something that I don't believe in for ANY peoples.

    This is the broken logic.
  • compuease wrote: »
    I'm back from dinner, so how is everyone, and did you all play nice? I see the place didn't implode so I guess wildbill did a good job in my absence..

    ah, so friendly around here... Isn't so nice and calm..


    now, back to discussion at hand, what was it anyways, feds scam, bad morals, darbs background, bitcoin, where the h*** were we ?
    possibly things are not calm, but not so likely to get worse. Perhaps, but hopefully not.

    Regardless I think we are here:
    ...digital assets or crypto coins, is like a new email technology that fixes broken communities that don't often otherwise realize they are even broken.

    I wouldn't be ready to do it yet, but its an interesting aspect of the conversation, depending if I am correct or not.
  • Startles wrote: »
    You have a history of calling me a racist fuckwad, and being mean to people in general. You function under the belief such violence and hate can possibly be justified. You are guilty exactly of what you accuse me of, and I was never what you call me in the first place.

    You call for other's ostracization and segregation sometimes because you mistakenly believe they ostracize a certain group?

    You want to dehumanize and look down on a person because they lack humanness?

    Hmmm... Which of us is full of hate again?

    Darb, your posts and life theories have all the humanism of a robot built and raised in a basement trying to read and research on the the internet as to what humans are supposed to be. You should really get out in the world and experience some of life.
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    Hmmm... Which of us is full of hate again?
    We have "hate", but the answer I mean here is the person or person that seem to revel in others weaknesses. The ones that seem quite content with certain peoples failures depending on their own criteria. The ones that seem to be consistently berating others and making up names for them. The people that are "full of hate" seem to be the ones that are constantly trying to pick a fight. Those that try to paint others in an unfavorable and untrue light.


    Darb, your posts and life theories have all the humanism of a robot built and raised in a basement trying to read and research on the the internet as to what humans are supposed to be. You should really get out in the world and experience some of life.
    ^this. Its not nice, its not intelligent. It's mean, violent, and sad.

    My life is fine, I have choosen this path for this time being, and will eventually move on, I am rebuilding, it takes time and it might not be the last time I have to do so...it is not something to look down upon someone for either I should think though. It is in fact, I believe, the experiencing of "life".
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    Darb, your posts and life theories have all the humanism of a robot built and raised in a basement trying to read and research on the the internet as to what humans are supposed to be. You should really get out in the world and experience some of life.

    This I think is the essence of darb's existence, think you may have nailed it.

    Darb, seriously, who are your friends outside of the interwebz and poker? Do you have any? Do you do anything outside your place of residence? For example most everyone on here that I know of leave their residence everyday and go to work or play with other humanoids. Do you do that?

    I mean this in all sincerity and with all due respect.
  • compuease wrote: »
    This I think is the essence of darb's existence, think you may have nailed it.

    Darb, seriously, who are your friends outside of the interwebz and poker? Do you have any? Do you do anything outside your place of residence? For example most everyone on here that I know of leave their residence everyday and go to work or play with other humanoids. Do you do that?

    I mean this in all sincerity and with all due respect.
    yes of course. lots, i just work on the tables. I play like 6 or so hours a day, and browse forums, watch vids, read articles and books etc. Then go do stuff when friends are available, and go out a couple times a week like normal. Lately I'm starting to add some uni courses, so I'm around a little more but that will settle down soon too.
  • Startles wrote: »
    Then go do stuff when friends are available, and go out a couple times a week like normal. Lately I'm starting to add some uni courses, so I'm around a little more but that will settle down soon too.
    This is what you need to do more about, and not talk about poker either, just every day stuff, girls, etc...;)
  • compuease wrote: »
    I'm back from dinner, so how is everyone, and did you all play nice? I see the place didn't implode so I guess wildbill did a good job in my absence.

    I didn't do a damn thing. I'm still trying to finish off my jerk chicken I started and the damn stuff still isn't up to temp.

    Sorry, slacker here.
  • compuease wrote: »
    This is what you need to do more about, and not talk about poker either, just every day stuff, girls, etc...;)
    I have no "poker talking" friends. Yes everyday stuff and I'll get there, just made decision a while ago to see what I can do with the game. I enjoy it, I'm glad I learned it, I'm happy for the game theory I learned from it, and it will always remain a hobby. I'll move on to something else soon, and eventually move on from whatever that is as well. For this thread and the energy I spend here, its simply because I think it is relevant and wrong.

    Moral poker right... this is how poker destorys lives. And how it gets its reputation. We are doing it wrong. And it is important, for all of us.
  • Startles wrote: »
    Moral poker right... this is how poker destorys lives. And how it gets its reputation. We are doing it wrong. And it is important, for all of us.
    You are right, poker (and gambling in general) does destroy lives but it is not because of the way it is run, it is because so many of us are weak and have no backbone..
    Poker is not important, not at all in the grand scheme of things.
  • Startles wrote: »
    This is the topic isn't it, I think you have done some incredible with this post. You nailed it. And I think it isn't my answer that is the law here. But you are really asking about the economics of different types of currencies and how the markets should interact with each other.

    Lolz. Thanks but you completely missed my point. Societies are for people with a common interest. If someone does not share that interest, he has no need for that society nor should that society change to accommodate.

    If you want to shit in the swimming pool, go do it where they are into that. Just not in mine.

    You can extrapolate that to society in general...
  • Milo wrote: »
    ...
    At least give the guy who created that credit
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Lolz. Thanks but you completely missed my point. Societies are for people with a common interest. If someone does not share that interest, he has no need for that society nor should that society change to accommodate.

    If you want to shit in the swimming pool, go do it where they are into that. Just not in mine.

    You can extrapolate that to society in general...
    that is the motto that fueled nazism. it is also what held slavery in place. it is the basis for hate. There is only one global community, and we all must live in it.
  • Startles wrote: »
    that is the motto that fueled nazism. it is also what held slavery in place. it is the basis for hate. There is only one global community, and we all must live in it.

    Theres also only one PFC, and Scoops owns that shit.
  • FYI, betrthanphil posted re Vancouver in the 2+2 thread at 1:17 this morning. Interesting as I know he defended Mike for a while... As did I..:-[
  • Startles wrote: »
    that is the motto that fueled nazism. it is also what held slavery in place. it is the basis for hate. There is only one global community, and we all must live in it.
    I don't care. Call me a nazi.
  • I call bs on anyone still responding to Startles' posts...nobody is really reading that pile of word vomit for anything more than trolling purposes.
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    At least give the guy who created that credit

    Sorry . . . I thought it would be self explanatory that it was not my work. Not really my thing.

    Some guy on 4 created it. At least, that's where I cribbed it from.
  • Startles wrote: »
    that is the motto that fueled nazism. it is also what held slavery in place. it is the basis for hate. There is only one global community, and we all must live in it.

    It is also what ENDED both of those nightmares.
  • What's pretty disgusting here is in this witch hunt, as there are so many identities, people are being dragged in that aren't him and that's whats pissing me off enough to post.

    I've not stired the pot, but I have friend who has zero reason to lie that got took for a few hundred. He wrote it off, but all it did was stop him from coming here and staking anyone else or buying action. So these types of actions affect everyone.

    The stupid thing is, had he just paid the few hundred, he would have likely been backed 1000s.

    I thought we were all pretty encouraging of Mike. I wished him well often along the way. So for him to start talking shit after he got freerolled in one of Bren's BAPs was greatly offensive.

    So here is my evidence - few years back when Bren did her RIO BAP, he booked action. Unlike some of Ash's this was not a square up later. All I knew of him at time was he was somewhat "probationary" here.

    She bricked the first 2. On that BAP I was pretty clear that I was selling to be able to enter more, so I asked him part way through to settle up. He was of course "on his way" to Vegas, but told me to ask BTP. I wasn't willing to do that. On the third event, she started running very deep and of course he was right in there. About the 5th pay jump, I told him to send the differnce, like $10 on Stars to legitize the BAP as if she were to ship, I knew she and I would have a tough time handing over 5k to someone who snuck in there.

    As it stood, when she cashed, I sent him what we owed over the $100 he had booked. I told him basically that I would have held him accountable to the action, so I will pay him, but made it softly clear his actions were sketchy.

    I'm sorry guys, but we all know a lot of the details match timelines we knew about. I think at this point, where people are potentially being scammed large money, it's time to stop defending.
  • jontm wrote: »
    I've not stired the pot, but I have friend who has zero reason to lie that got took for a few hundred. He wrote it off, but all it did was stop him from coming here and staking anyone else or buying action. So these types of actions affect everyone.

    That was on here? If so how come I wasn't made aware of it? Or was it before my time. I do recall your dispute with Mike re Bren's BAP but thought you settled it..
  • I did settle it, I found it interesting that he would then insult her. I left it alone. I was disappointed to see actions with friend who was staking him ruin opportunity others, but after you bared him and other guy left, figured why dredge it up. But somehow he always seems to find his way back. In light of this 2+2 thread, figure it's time
  • jontm wrote: »
    I did settle it, I found it interesting that he would then insult her. I left it alone. I was disappointed to see actions with friend who was staking him ruin opportunity others, but after you bared him and other guy left, figured why dredge it up. But somehow he always seems to find his way back. In light of this 2+2 thread, figure it's time

    So Mike was backed by a friend of yours through here and he welched?? Or was this a separate backing that went wrong. I don't recall anything to do with Mike other than the Bren issue and some small amount that T8 sent him but was eventually settled. If there were other issues then we were lucky it didn't happen here although I can't imagine anyone on here being $20K foolish.
  • Mike was backed by a friend, he met via quite a few BAPs here. It was around the same time of the incident I described. Then he burnt him for a loan. Both stopped coming right about then. Shit started to hit fan in forum for Costanza anyway.
  • I am amazed that anyone with any poker knowledge has ever backed Fed, a losing low limit player.
  • So after posting about what we know, another player on 2+2 links to this:
    Staking Dispute Question

    Almost indentical "dispute" with unpaid BAP, same excuses on his end, but the community says his reputation proceeds him...how many of these angles, or scams does it take as evidence? This 9 pager says a lot.
Sign In or Register to comment.