We Are Poker Players - join the protest against Amaya.

Hello, fellow canadian players!

Firstly i am sorry if i am posting in a wrong forum, i contacted moderator 2 days ago, but he didn't reply.


What happened?
18 months ago Company Amaya took a huge loan to buy Pokerstars and now makes players pay for it. In those 18 months they made a series of decisions (like introducing 2,5% fee on non-USD deposits or increasing rake in Spin&Gos or few more) to make games worse for everyone. According to the statistical service Macropoker, recent change in VIP-System will extract around 94 million USD from poker per year. In its press releases, Amaya names caring for the game’s ecology as the reason behind these changes, but it’s not clear how extracting money helps it.


I represent wearepokerplayers.com . Our site is dedicated to the protest of poker players against upcoming changes in pokerstars VIP system and against Amaya's (Pokerstars's owners) policy in general. Below I will write a short version of our plan. Longer version is available at our site(including economical justification).


What will we do?
We offer a few-steps strategy. First step in massive international strike on January 1-7, the goal of this step is to attract attention of the poker communities all over the world. This strike is supported by at least 1400 players at Tiltbook and also by various high-stakes players like Dani “Ansky” Stern, Daniel “Oxota” Dvoress, Andreas “Skjervoy” Torbergsen etc
Step 2. We’re staging a strike probably on Feb 2-11, also for a week or 10 days. The most likely dates are Feb 2-11. At this stage, our goal is to reach 4,000–5,000 participants. In fact, this strike repeats the previous one. We are also hoping for your support. At this stage, we’ll begin to advertize step 3 extremely actively and convince people to take part in our next strike.
Step 3. This is our site initiative. As soon as we get 5,000 players, we’ll start the next and final step – monthly strike with possibility of extension. The number of 5,000 players comes from our analysis of statistical data. 5,000 active players, including at least 2,500 Supernovas+, generate no less than 15% of pure rake (rake minus rakeback). If we decrease rake by 15%, we cut Amaya's EBITDA by half thus increasing their debt/EBITDA ratio from a heavy 6.6 to a critical number of at least 10. We really hope to reach 5000 players before step 2, the earlier we make a crucial strike – the better.


We demand:
We demand that every game-related change be approved by an online players council. Members of the council will be elected on our site and will represent different stakes and communities. Recent changes regarding the VIP system have to be cancelled as they weren't approved by the players.


In conclusion, I ask every one of you to join our site and join the first strike of January 1-7. If you are a poker journalist, please write an article about the protest and about our site. it is important to spread this information for as many players as possible. Also, in the next post I will write a FAQ about the site and about a few common misconceptions. Stopping Amaya is extremely important for the whole industry. Together we will win!
«1

Comments

  • And here are some of the most frequently answered questions:


    Who are you exactly? Have a heard of any of you?

    - Our site came from the russian poker community and our team consists of poker players and businessman. Although you've probably never heard of us before, our reputation back home is very good and more than 400 players from our community joined our site including double-digit number of Supernovas Elite. Also we're in contact with many notable players around the globe.


    Well, I expect you will advertise every other site for the players, nice trick!

    -
    No, we don't have an affiliate program nor planning to have one.


      Guys, you are too radical. Surely signing a petition or making a short 3-5 days strike will make Amaya come to the senses?

      - No, there already have been a massive action in writing letters to Pokerstars support (they replied with the standart form), then there were a 3-days strike, at which Amaya lost between 500k and 1mil, to that strike they replied with hypocritical press release stating that they didn't notice any effect on the strike. Clearly, Amaya is now cornered and won't stop at anything, and the only reason they understand is money. They plan to take approximately 1,8M per week with this reform, we must reduce rake by more.


        Everyone knows that rake doesn't matter for the poker rooms, only the difference between deposits and cashouts.

        - Nope, Amaya has fixed expenses and they are pretty big. They need as much rake as they can get especially now when their debt is huge and their stock price is plummeting. And winning players make a lot of rake. Supernovas Elite and simple Supernovas generate around 30% of pure rake – almost as much as Amaya profits.


          So, all of those numbers, they are just made up, right?

          - No, we have an access to the advanced statistical figures by the sharkscope-like statistical service Macropoker.

            Why do we have to register at your site? And procedure is so complicated!

            - We want to be as transparent as possible so we ask players to verify their account with the screenshot so procedure takes around 2 minutes. Not much to prolong your career for much longer time. Also we are planning to make our site the center of the protest movement place for players from all communities games and stakes. If we succeed we may try to form a players union based in the protest.

            I know how to make your site better. You do * your suggestion* .
            - Thank you! We appreciate any feedback, our site is still very young, it was made in very little time and not perfect yet. We have a huge improvements list and some of them take a lot of time to implement, so don't get mad if we didn't do something you suggest immediately.


            I am already the member of another strike.

            - Great! But anyway consider signing in with us too. The reasons are:
              • 1. We partner with other actions. We're allied with Tiltbook and 2+2 and if you know any other protesting group - please ask them to contact us or let us contact them.
                2. We developed a special functionality to help people in finding other regs and to support you in public discussions
                3. The movement must be global but needs strong coordination to be effective.
                4. The important part of opposition lays in a field of publicity and information. We do our estimations basing on the data on the number of players, their VIP PS status etc
            I am not a Supernova and clearly not a SNE, why would I care?
            - Our protest is not about rakeback, it's about company Amaya who wants to turn our favorite poker room into a global casino where everyone loses. If current change doesn't affect you directly next one definetely will.
          • Just like the December 1-3 boycott, I will join the poker community's strike against Amaya on January 1-7. I withdrew most of my PokerStars cash on December 1, and will withdraw again on January 1.

            The most effective protest against Amaya is to play elsewhere, such as softer sites and live. In my case, my New Year's Resolutions will include playing more live instead of online.
            First step in massive international strike on January 1-7, the goal of this step is to attract attention of the poker communities all over the world. This strike is supported by at least 1400 players at Tiltbook and also by various high-stakes players like Dani “Ansky” Stern, Daniel “Oxota” Dvoress, Andreas “Skjervoy” Torbergsen etc
          • As part of the PokerStars strike, I decided to withdraw my entire cash balance today. Uncle Baazov gave me a conversion rate of 1.35 for my INSTANT echecks U$ withdrawal.

            Team Pro Isaac Haxton has just joined Alex 'Kanu7' Millar in resigning from PokerStars. :o Hopefully, Daniel Negreanu will have the "integrity" to also resign if Amaya continues to ignore their requests.
          • We published an article(can be found on our site) on the matter by famous chess grandmaster Alexander Grischuk
          • Sorry, but you are proposing a boycott, not a "strike". Nobody who plays on Stars or Full Tilt is an employee. Rather, they are CUSTOMERS. what has happened is that Amaya has changed the rules of their "loyalty program". That's it. Now, there may be a legal case with respect to things that were promised during 2015 and then were denied as of January 1st, but other than filing a class action suit to recover those promised rewards, I really do not see that players have ANY choice beyond a PERMANENT boycott. Otherwise, Amaya will simply move ahead as planned, and count on the greed of the individual to outlast the will of the collective.

            Anything beyond a total and permanent boycott or a class action suit to recover promised "rewards" is just pissing into the wind.
          • Milo wrote: »
            Sorry, but you are proposing a boycott, not a "strike". Nobody who plays on Stars or Full Tilt is an employee.
            This is just a play of words, there was a lot of discussion about it at 2p2, but it's not that important imho.
            Milo wrote: »
            I really do not see that players have ANY choice beyond a PERMANENT boycott. Otherwise, Amaya will simply move ahead as planned, and count on the greed of the individual to outlast the will of the collective.
            Yeah, this is a big problem. We tried to explain this to the western opinion leaders such as ansky but couldn't. Unfortunately this position was found as too radical. We signed around 400 players to the permanent boycott in russian community but clearly lacked influence outside of it so we had to compromise.
          • And that is why this will all be a whole lot of nothing. Too many people just do NOT care.
          • Well, i think that they care just don't see the whole amount of danger and concider things we say as exaggerated scary story.
            We, on the other hand, leave in much more unprotected society and we know things what people who are both in unlimited power and in desperate need are capable of. Actually, i'm posting these messages above in different local communities around the world and by far the best responce came from Brazil, country that is a lot similar to Russia.
          • Simply put . . . ANYONE who puts money into a site like Stars knows the risks they are taking with their money. If they don't they are a fool. As for protection, don't make me laugh . . .

            As stated, the only legitimate complaint is over the "bait and switch" aspect of the rewards program. Nothing else has a hope in hell of succeeding, and I doubt that you get a significant number of players willing to sign on for a class action.

            THEY DO NOT CARE
          • Milo wrote: »
            Nothing else has a hope in hell of succeeding

            Well, massive boycott has this chance and our numbers prove it.
          • Anyone have any definitive numbers on the remaining total of active (or semi active) online players left across the world? Gotta believe the totals are way down.
          • i'm posting these messages above in different local communities around the world and by far the best responce came from Brazil, country that is a lot similar to Russia.
            Which community has the lowest response?
          • Well, massive boycott has this chance and our numbers prove it.

            Is it going to be a permanent boycott? Will you monitor to see if supporters start trickling back to Amaya's sites?
          • BlondeFish wrote: »
            Which community has the lowest response?

            Every english-speaking probably. Somehow american players (and probably brits) concider that we demand too much and ask from participants too much. Even negotiating 1-week strike with them was a hard task they initially wanted for every participant just to withdraw 10% of their rolls. probably under such a task we would've signed thousands of players already, but i don't think that would have any effect at all
          • Milo wrote: »
            Is it going to be a permanent boycott? Will you monitor to see if supporters start trickling back to Amaya's sites?

            Well, we'd prefer it to be permanent, but we'll start with 1 month. As for monitoring, i think that would be a self-regulating system, participants will monitor their games and stakes.
          • A month will hurt, but Amaya will survive. What happens in February (or sooner), when people go back to business as usual? You will have held your breath, stomped your feet, hurt Amaya in a temporary fashion, and achieved . . . what?
          • We actually have one month with possibility of prolonging boycott after a participants poll. This month btw will hurt Amaya a lot, they will be notified and, i hope, will start negotiations sooner.
          • Wanna bet?
          • I haven't really chimed in as I don't really play online... but I have to agree w/ Milo here (!).

            The only legit complaint is the retracted SNE promises made for 2016 - which is of course a big deal but is a separate issue than the above.

            I just think that the idea that the customer can "demand" to have a say in how their business is run is downright silly. You are of course free to make suggestions, quit playing on their site, or start your own... but I have to picture the Amaya execs reading stuff like "We demand" and just laughing... it discredits the whole argument.

            So maybe I just don't like the wording, but either way I gotta say this isn't likely to work. GL though, as I do think some of the changes are not in their best interest.
          • Well, our whole idea is that if we have enough players supporting us we can demand whatever we want as long as it's reasonable. What we ask is reasonable - basically like it was during Scheinberg's era. Players meetings meant something back there, rake was lowered in games it was reasonable, players were shown numbers on every game and all of the decisions were explained.
          • Amaya is a private entity. the only people who can make demands that will be taken SERIOUSLY, are the owners/shareholders. That isn't some guy in a condo playing 5/10 for 8 hours a day.
          • From what I understand and have read, PokerStars used to listen to their regular, high volume SNE players prior to Amaya taking over. They would fly them to head office and listen to their concerns and implement some of their suggestions.
            What Amaya is doing is making it difficult, if not impossible, for their high volume players to make a living on their site. I would hope Amaya has crunched the numbers and has decided they can be more profitable this way but pissing off your biggest volume players doesn't seem to be a smart move.
          • The move is sheer genius. Sheer genius I tell ya!
          • Milo wrote: »
            Amaya is a private entity. the only people who can make demands that will be taken SERIOUSLY, are the owners/shareholders. That isn't some guy in a condo playing 5/10 for 8 hours a day.

            Well, once again, the whole idea is "we gather enough players to crush their economic measures -> they have to go bust or negotiate". That never happened before, but noone ever tried to.
          • "they have to go bust or negotiate" So if you bust them, then you win? Sorry pal ,but the only players I think give a shit about your protest are the players making a living playing poker. As a rec player I could care less about what Amaya does, I play to have fun , and the more regs that leave, the better for the game as far as I'm concerned
          • botmac wrote: »
            "they have to go bust or negotiate" so if you bust them, then you win? Sorry pal ,but the only players i think give a shit about your protest are the players making a living playing poker. As a rec player i could care less about what amaya does, i play to have fun , and the more players using tracking tools that leave, the better for the game as far as i'm concerned
            fyp..
          • Well, once again, the whole idea is "we gather enough players to crush their economic measures -> they have to go bust or negotiate". That never happened before, but noone ever tried to.

            I thought Id come back to save this guy some time and effort.

            Dear Sir,

            You have chosen to post on a website that has precisely zero players the make their living playing the pokers online. The moves Amaya is making does nothing for the casual player, and, in fact, may be beneficial if it forces those who have made the game a career into another profession.

            Please stick around to post poker related content and/or troll at your leisure, but this thread is lose/lose.
          • well, we have a few canadian players registered on our site, so, i guess, your estimation is wrong
            Also, one more thing
            compuease wrote: »
            fyp..
            That became a really popular misconception in a recent years that regular players beat recreational players using tracking tools. It is really far from truth, i never look beyond few basic stats (like VPIP and PFR) when i play against recreational opponent, all of the advanced stats are needed only against other regular players. And Stars don't plan to remove basic stats, why else would they create and promote Jivaro?
          • well, we have a few canadian players registered on our site, so, i guess, your estimation is wrong.

            The statistical probability of Wetts being wrong in ANY estimation surrounding poker is pretty much equivalent to my chances becoming the UFC Heavyweight Champion of the world, bedding Salma Hayek, and being elected POPE.
          Sign In or Register to comment.