Analysis: Flop top set out of position vs sh!te board.

This was the topic of a drunken discussion between a friend and myself, a conversation which lasted from 3am to 5am on the casino floor of the Wynn, and resulted in me coming to the conclusion that he was right - I did in fact donk out on this hand.

I will post what actually happened later... in the mean time, here's a "what would you do" scenario for the way the hand started out:


$1-$3 NL Hold Em at the Wynn, Las Vegas

Seat 9: BFillmaff - Stack $800 (Small Blind)
Seat 3: Maniac - Stack $500
Seat 6: Tourist - Stack $350

Table Notes:

BFillmaff - Seeing many cheap flops given the favorable table conditions. A few good showdowns and up a few hundred at this point.

Maniac - is a true gem. Gone through four buyins in the past hour at $500 a pop. Past two buy ins he is visibly tilting. Examples include re-raising multiple streets all the way to show down with K5o for top pair (losing to two pair) in a recent hand.

Tourist - relatively new to the table and hadn't been involved in many pots. Not a lot of information on this guy, but confirmed he was vacationing in Vegas.



Pre Flop

6 Limpers Call $3

BFillmaff looks down at KK and raises to $23

Maniac Calls $20
Tourist Calls $20

Flop

Q J K (rainbow)

POT: $78

BFillmaff is first to act. What do you do here?
«1

Comments

  • Bfillmaff wrote: »
    This was the topic of a drunken discussion between a friend and myself, a conversation which lasted from 3am to 5am on the casino floor of the Wynn, and resulted in me coming to the conclusion that he was right - I did in fact donk out on this hand.

    I will post what actually happened later... in the mean time, here's a "what would you do" scenario for the way the hand started out:


    $1-$3 NL Hold Em at the Wynn, Las Vegas

    Seat 9: BFillmaff - Stack $800 (Small Blind)
    Seat 3: Maniac - Stack $500
    Seat 6: Tourist - Stack $350

    Table Notes:

    BFillmaff - Seeing many cheap flops given the favorable table conditions. A few good showdowns and up a few hundred at this point.

    Maniac - is a true gem. Gone through four buyins in the past hour at $500 a pop. Past two buy ins he is visibly tilting. Examples include re-raising multiple streets all the way to show down with K5o for top pair (losing to two pair) in a recent hand.

    Tourist - relatively new to the table and hadn't been involved in many pots. Not a lot of information on this guy, but confirmed he was vacationing in Vegas.



    Pre Flop

    6 Limpers Call $3

    BFillmaff looks down at KK and raises to $23

    Maniac Calls $20
    Tourist Calls $20

    Flop

    Q J K (rainbow)

    POT: $78

    BFillmaff is first to act. What do you do here?


    Betting around 40$ and re-evaluating the turn, and so they could have something like j-9,q-9,j-10 and 9-10 ts hard to continue if an A or 10 come on the board and I don't think they'd limp with A-10. anyway i'd bet flop and see what the turn is.. the only hand that beat you that is possible is 9-10 which you are beating 34% of the time. I'm betting every street if no A or 10 comes on board..
  • I agree with sniperboy here 40-50 here on the flop. 9 10 or drawing to other straights is a possibility. I would make them pay to see the next card and hope it is not an A or 10. If they both call and the next card has no texture I bet half the pot on the turn. Odds are they don't have the 9 10 and i would not give them any free looks to get there.
  • Why is no one considering one of them already has the straight, A-T

    I agree we have to bet the flop to give the wrong odds to the draws.
  • djgolfcan wrote: »
    Why is no one considering one of them already has the straight, A-T

    I agree we have to bet the flop to give the wrong odds to the draws.

    how often do people limp with A-10?
  • sn1perb0y wrote: »
    how often do people limp with A-10?

    in a 1-3 game, more than should.
  • sn1perb0y wrote: »
    how often do people limp with A-10?

    Very
  • djgolfcan wrote: »
    in a 1-3 game, more than should.

    I think its the opposite and your range is too tight.. just my opinion, if ur gonna consider every raise to be A-j+ and TT+ ur folding 92% hands pre or ur hand is -EV (pretty irrational)
  • bet 3/4 of pot and pray the maniac reraises you...also , pre flop i would of made it 35 to go, but thats just me.
  • Very interesting. The friend that I was discussing this hand with, a player who I very much respect, was making the case for check-calling. Like I said, we debated this for some time!


    As it actually played out:

    BFillmaff: Bets $45
    Maniac Calls $45
    Tourist Raises to $145

    BFillmaff: $100 to call. What do you do here?
  • I like Marban's post.

    As played, I am either going to shove or fold. Don't think you can call, because what do you do when the maniac shoves?

    Me? I am likely shoving and praying I hit my boat . . .







    Truth be told, I would be on the rail, after cashing out with my winnings.
  • what hands limp, call pf then raise on that board? lots more than just AT or 9T. state some ranges and do the math.

    raise it up another hundred and see how the maniac reacts. if a T comes on the turn you won't get any more from you opponents if you are ahead. the same may be true for an A.

    OK it was supposed to be *your opponents but stupid android doesn't cooperate with this forum. and tapatalk annoys me
  • My thoughts exactly, and thats what I did.

    Bfillmaff All in

    Maniac tanks, then folds.

    Tourist Calls. Shows 9-10 for the straight.

    Turn and river are blanks, tourist wins a handsome pot.


    It was a cooler of a hand for sure and it feels a bit better knowing that you guys would have played it the same way. ($35 pre does sound like a good idea, as after Maniac calls $20 of course 9-10 is coming in)

    Knowing now how the hand played out, what are your thoughts on a Check-Call on the flop with this hand?


    Speaking of, I was fortunate enough to redeem myself in the exact same spot the next day. QQ against 9-10, same board. Check, call, make boat, shove, paid :). If only it were always that easy!
  • I urge you to estimate the ranges and do the math. Check calling loses you the same almost always but makes you less oop.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • Was all in the optimal play? Discuss.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • Hands in range that I beat:

    Q10
    J10
    KQ (less likely but possible)
    KJ ""
    JJ

    Hands in range that beat me:

    9-10

    Unlikely hands possibly in range:

    A10
    QQ
    QJ


    Looking more like I just got unlucky to run into the 9-10.

    I will do the math when I get home... On a phone right now but loving the discussion. This was the same logic I went through during the hand and like I said it's nice to know i am thinking along the right line.

    And I can't wait to tell my buddy he's wrong... (Again!)
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Was all in the optimal play? Discuss.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU

    Tourist Stack size $350 at start of hand - i think its shove or fold when he raises the $100. Calling may give odds to Maniac if he has a 10, 9, or A in his hand - were playing pretty deep. (He claimed afterwards to have folded JJ, but could have easily been J10 etc.)
  • He didn't have JJ or he would have raised PF and on the flop. He had a T.

    For sure the tourist isn't folding with about half his stack already in. I'm thinking more if we can get some $ from the maniac or is it not worth it.

    Good discussion. Bout time we had one on this site.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • For the tourist, is calling 20 extra pf a +ev move with 330 behind? I guess it might be but I'm not convinced.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • sn1perb0y wrote: »
    how often do people limp with A-10?

    They aren't raising with AT but they'll play it.
  • sn1perb0y wrote: »
    how often do people limp with A-10?

    A LOT!

    Me, about 50% of the time.
  • Yeah A-10 was certainly a possibility but I still think much less likely - Personally if I'm limping then calling $20, I'd rather have 9-10 or even Q-J.
  • what does the math indicate?
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    what does the math indicate?

    K this is pretty crude, but I just ran through some quick math in excel. Both plays (check/call vs all in) actually come up similar in terms of EV according to this, however for simplicity's sake I did operate under the assumption that Maniac was going to fold his hand. I'd actually like to play around some more when I have time and see what the #'s look like in true multi-way calculation based on both of their ranges, but for now, that was a fun exercise!

    16izj7s.png


    Thoughts?
  • Ah dang it already caught a major mistake .. I forgot to include the chance of calling and hitting the draws - this would bump up the win % to more than 25% when calling ... Will rework...
  • Poker stove?

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • Cant say I have ever tried pokerstove - but after a quick google I see that I have been missing out!

    (Still love working out poker spots in excel ... Like I said its a bit crude, but I think there's some value in doing it "the long way")


    (..... Although maybe less value when I notice my numbers are wrong 5 minutes after posting....)


    Will definitely be checking that out, thx.
  • Ya wrong out weighs the other stuff.

    Let me see what you come up with and there may be more to discuss. This could get interesting.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • I could actually learn something

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Ya wrong out weighs the other stuff.

    Let me see what you come up with and there may be more to discuss. This could get interesting.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU

    Ha, yeah for sure - I was definitely rushing a bit on that one... Hard to justify keeping the wife waiting while I do poker math with strangers on the internet :)

    Looking forward to dicking around with this hand some more when I get home -
    And if you learn something, even better!! (Assuming the math checks out... No guarantees on that.........)
  • I honestly Limp A-10 most of the time when playing six handed or more... It really depends on what type of game my opponents are playing...Slow,aggressive,tight,etc, and how many players are in the pot. I limp a lot with A-10 in MTT's, I usually 3 bet A-10 in cash games.
Sign In or Register to comment.