Options
as per hobbes...
PokerStars Game #61945169525: Tournament #392379657, $200+$15 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XIV (1500/3000) - 2011/05/10 20:14:16 PT [2011/05/10 23:14:16 ET]
Table '392379657 6' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: BIGMICKG (22010 in chips)
Seat 2: LRAIFM (11263 in chips)
Seat 3: Moorman1 (22547 in chips)
Seat 4: HowDoWeDo (19572 in chips)
Seat 5: zilbeee (30930 in chips)
Seat 6: JasonX85 (5000 in chips)
Seat 7: johnj16 (22700 in chips)
Seat 8: forboon (24884 in chips)
Seat 9: QcKimo (4895 in chips)
BIGMICKG: posts the ante 300
LRAIFM: posts the ante 300
Moorman1: posts the ante 300
HowDoWeDo: posts the ante 300
zilbeee: posts the ante 300
JasonX85: posts the ante 300
johnj16: posts the ante 300
forboon: posts the ante 300
QcKimo: posts the ante 300
LRAIFM: posts small blind 1500
Moorman1: posts big blind 3000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to forboon [Tc 8c]
HowDoWeDo: folds
zilbeee: folds
JasonX85: folds
johnj16: folds
forboon: Shoves ???
Table '392379657 6' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: BIGMICKG (22010 in chips)
Seat 2: LRAIFM (11263 in chips)
Seat 3: Moorman1 (22547 in chips)
Seat 4: HowDoWeDo (19572 in chips)
Seat 5: zilbeee (30930 in chips)
Seat 6: JasonX85 (5000 in chips)
Seat 7: johnj16 (22700 in chips)
Seat 8: forboon (24884 in chips)
Seat 9: QcKimo (4895 in chips)
BIGMICKG: posts the ante 300
LRAIFM: posts the ante 300
Moorman1: posts the ante 300
HowDoWeDo: posts the ante 300
zilbeee: posts the ante 300
JasonX85: posts the ante 300
johnj16: posts the ante 300
forboon: posts the ante 300
QcKimo: posts the ante 300
LRAIFM: posts small blind 1500
Moorman1: posts big blind 3000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to forboon [Tc 8c]
HowDoWeDo: folds
zilbeee: folds
JasonX85: folds
johnj16: folds
forboon: Shoves ???
Comments
not relevant.
This is not as wide as you can do this. nh.
If you have moorman's stack, what are you calling off with here vs forboon's shove.
and this is the part id like vekked to clear up...or wetts.....but i can never lose in the long run vs moorman here...unless hes drunk....
and because of the other players in the pot i can't expect to gain more in the long run because they aren't as good....
Any ace/pair, k10+, maybe k9s, qjs
basically this.
22+ Ax+ K2s+ K8o+ Q6s+ Q9o+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 97s+ 87s
not trying to answer your question hobbes...more trying to compare answers....
This assumes villain is always competent, so its OK. I personally give people a bit more credit for being not perfect (by this I mean lack of playing unexploitably), but in game I prob call a little tighter than this, but not a ton.
helps when u can see the cards tho.
22+ Ax+ K2s+ K8o+ Q6s+ Q9o+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 97s+ 87s?
also i was under the assumption moorman was not a person
We're getting sick odds in the BB, we only need 42% to call. The only way we don't have that is if they're shoving less than 15% (77+,A7s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KTo+,QJo). I don't think there's barely a person on the internet who's folding one of those hands, and most ppl are shoving way wider with 8BB in the hijack.
Kinda depends how on my game I was. That's nash right? I think K2s, Q6s, 97s, 87s, type stuff might see the muck in game a lot of times. All hands in nash should 100% be called vs. regs at this level though, even slightly wider vs. most.
You might be giving a bit too much credit to good regs and their shortstack abilities. Moorman probs is better than most regs for pushbotting, but a lot of regs are really atrocious, hence why I'm more likely to play 1k turbo's than normal 1k's. Many good regs aren't good just b/c they're shortstack ninjas.
edit: oops its slightly wide....i went the back wards way....
this:
22+ Ax+ K6s+ K9o+ Q9s+ QTo+ J9s+ T9s
lord did you do that off your head....
Watcha mean exactly? Like turbo's will bring out better shortstack players? I think up to 109s or something it might be true, but most of the guys w/ enough money to play 1k turbos and stuff are guys who made most of that money due to their skills with deeper stacks.
if moorman is the pusher its a rediculous fold i think....hes shoving wider than....
22+ Ax+ K5s+ KTo+ Q8s+ QTo+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 97s+ 87s 76s
It could be true from an ICM/$EV perspective, like if we're deep in the money or close the the money bubble, but if we're far away from the money or it's a winner take all I think you have to call this for sure.