48÷2(9+3)=?

Viral argument sweeping the interweb. What say ye, CPF?
«13

Comments

  • People are seriously arguing about this?

    wow
  • There is no valid argument anywhere to make this ambiguous [/thread]

    the fact that I accedently clicked the wrong button is another thing. But write it out 48 x 12 / 2 and you really can't get it wrong

    Edit: If you still don't see it, you're putting invisible brackets around 2(9+3) for absolutely no reason

    lol, i was wrong but it's still not ambiguous. you expand the brackets before any other mathematical operation meaning that there will in fact be an invisible bracket around the 2(9+3). 48/2*12 = 288 tho but this should end up as 2
  • Using BEDMAS, you will get the answer which is 288
  • I say 56....just because.
  • My logic tells me 2 and I think was the way I was taught however BEDMAS says 288 and there are different rules you can go by to get either answer. Therefore tis useless us arguing it as we can all find "rules" either way...

    Sorta like a house rule in poker...
  • That's what I like about science...

    There's no one right answer.

    Mark
  • Seems like a good time for: 350.
  • FWIW

    Excel comes up with 288

    Mark
  • I had a math teacher way back in high school gave us a 32 pg explanation why 1+1 does not equal 2 . lol

    I think 2 would be a good answer. LOL
    FMP
  • HVEEPOKER wrote: »
    I had a math teacher way back in high school gave us a 32 pg explanation why 1+1 does not equal 2 . lol
    FMP

    Well, now we know where you get some of your poker reasoning from ;-)
  • DataMn wrote: »
    Well, now we know where you get some of your poker reasoning from ;-)


    :) potd
  • Damn, Now I have to wear my incognito hat with the bullshit protectors.
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Seems like a good time for: 350.

    LOL @ other forum references....
  • Back in the 60's we learned...

    1. Do what is in the brackets first.
    2. Do multiplication and division next in the order that it comes.
    3. Do addition and subtraction next in the order that it comes.

    Therefore the answer would be 2.
  • Buzzzardd wrote: »
    Back in the 60's we learned...

    1. Do what is in the brackets first.
    2. Do multiplication and division next in the order that it comes.
    3. Do addition and subtraction next in the order that it comes.

    Therefore the answer would be 2.

    This. Aren't calculators an awesome invention?!
  • The correct answer is 288, based on the question as written.

    Brackets first, so 9+3 = 12

    Multiplication and division are next, performed in the order they appear, so . . .

    the remaining equation looks like this
    48 divided by 2 multiplied by 12
    24 x 12 = 288


    QED
  • Buzzzardd wrote: »
    Back in the 60's we learned...

    1. Do what is in the brackets first.
    2. Do multiplication and division next in the order that it comes.
    3. Do addition and subtraction next in the order that it comes.

    Therefore the answer would be 2.

    Not sure why I am responding but ...

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 24 * 12
    = 288

    you did

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 48/24
    = 2

    To get your answer you need the equation written as
    48/(2*(9+3))
  • Buzzzardd wrote: »
    Back in the 60's we learned...

    1. Do what is in the brackets first.
    2. Do multiplication and division next in the order that it comes.
    3. Do addition and subtraction next in the order that it comes.

    Therefore the answer would be 2.
    It does not indicate what to do with the 2 and the brackets so you automatically add.

    eg 48 divide by 2 x (9+3) 48 divide by 2 - (9+3) etc...
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    Not sure why I am responding but ...

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 24 * 12
    = 288

    you did

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 48/24
    = 2

    To get your answer you need the equation written as
    48/(2*(9+3))


    This, my friends is the second sign of the Apocalypse . . . Hobbes and I agree.
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    Not sure why I am responding but ...

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 24 * 12
    = 288

    you did

    48 / 2 * (9+3)
    = 48 / 2 * 12
    = 48/24
    = 2

    To get your answer you need the equation written as
    48/(2*(9+3))

    that's what I thought too at first but everything connected to the bracket should be calculated first. you wouldn't read 48/2x as 48x/2 after all
  • Apples < Oranges . . .
  • Buzzzardd wrote: »
    Back in the 60's we learned...

    1. Do what is in the brackets first.
    2. Do multiplication and division next in the order that it comes.
    3. Do addition and subtraction next in the order that it comes.

    Therefore the answer would be 2.

    After doing this more slowly, the correct answer is indeed 288. I have to stop trying to do this shit between jobs at work.
  • Unless math has changed from the 50s it's 2.
    However I could argue that the answer is 69 based on the agruments put forth so far. (How about 68 and I will owe you one)
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Seems like a good time for: 350.

    kind of on the right track here....but the answer is:

    48÷2(9+3)= What you do with the 3rd wire.
  • Richard~ wrote: »
    that's what I thought too at first but everything connected to the bracket should be calculated first. you wouldn't read 48/2x as 48x/2 after all

    That's algebra though.
  • I should see if I can find that Texas Instruments Calculus calculator from school. OMG.
    :-\
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    People are seriously arguing about this?

    wow

    +1
  • Maths is tough.

    Excel is smarts. It say 288.

    I choose that.
  • There is no multiplication sign between the 2 and the bracket, they are to be considered together as part of the same equation. 2(9+3). Then you consider the next part of the equation. With the mutiplication sign between the 2 and the bracket then there is room for discussion.
  • I am sticking with my original answer. I am also sticking with my horsey . . .

    I like my horsey . . . and I will give him an apple.
Sign In or Register to comment.