monsters here are this no? 22+,ATs+,ATo+.....maybe we'd take 22-88 as not a monster since were short
Yea take out the pairs. Just stuff that dominates us mostly. We also have to assume readless that he raises some stuff, and if he's limp-trapping it's more often with QQ-AA than with AK/TT
Yea take out the pairs. Just stuff that dominates us mostly. We also have to assume readless that he raises some stuff, and if he's limp-trapping it's more often with QQ-AA than with AK/TT
yes yes yes....i feel like one day i may know how to play poker...
Comments
Ahh, tyvm, yea I agree it's >1%, but I'd say <10% or something that he has a monsters, IMO.
Ok don't spread this around, it's a secret
HoldemResources.net: ICM Nash Calculator
UTG+4 1515 25.2%, 22+ A2s+ A7o+ K7s+ KTo+ Q9s+ QJo J8s+ JTo T8s+ 98s 87s
monsters here are this no? 22+,ATs+,ATo+.....maybe we'd take 22-88 as not a monster since were short
Yea take out the pairs. Just stuff that dominates us mostly. We also have to assume readless that he raises some stuff, and if he's limp-trapping it's more often with QQ-AA than with AK/TT
yes yes yes....i feel like one day i may know how to play poker...