GG Michael Jackson
So if you havent heard, he died.
In light of this news, I pose this conundrum:
What is the difference between MJ and Disney Films?
Highlight below for answer.
Disney Films can still touch kids.
In light of this news, I pose this conundrum:
What is the difference between MJ and Disney Films?
Highlight below for answer.
Disney Films can still touch kids.
Comments
What do Walmart and Michael Jackson have in common?
Boys pants half off.
you know, your bad, your bad.. great icon from the 80s. Still remember when the Thriller video was the big thing.
This is wacko Jacko after all.
Maybe Andy Kaufman helped him.
(The younuns may not get that reference
YouTube - Michael Jackson dies at 50
I just wish he left his face alone ...
The HisTory of Michael Jackson's face
He molested kids.
Bye bye. I am not too sad to see it.
roflmao
Disturbing though really, but funny
Prove it.
How about that he admitted that he slept in beds with little kids who were not his.
Just because a court said once that he was not guilty doesn't mean he was innocent. Ask O.J.
I can't beleive people honestly think this guy was innocent.
Just for the record....when the parents take $10 million....it's not molestation it's prostitution. I actually have proof for that:
Sir can I molest your child?
NO WAY IN HELL YOU PERVERT!
What if I give you $10 million?
.....what time do you want me to drop him off?
All the money in the world wouldn't keep me from prosecuting you/running you over with my car. Besides the $10 million simply means they had embarrassing testimony/accusations....not that he molested anyone. When you have $200 million (which he did at the time) you spend $10 not to get dragged through the mud. (Smart rich men do it all the time) You don't think he would have lost MORE than $10 million in future revenues if it had come out that he runs around in a Banana's in Pajamas thong?
Once again I am stealing one of your posts for my FB status.
Live in your fairy tale land. If anyone else in the world was accused this often and these many things come to light they would have been in jail years ago. It had nothing to do with his fame and money. Nothing at all.
I would have never let my kids be in a room alone with him or worse yet spend the night with him. If you can say you would have felt 100% safe with your six-year-old at his house overnight then you praise him all you want.
I think Lisa Marie Presley's blog entry is pretty interesting, comparing the parallels of her father's death and Jackson's death, and Michael's premonition (almost 20 years ago) that he might follow in the same footsteps as Elvis:
MySpace.com Blogs - Lisa Marie Presley MySpace Blog
60's: hey, who's the cute front man for the Jackson 5? That kid's pretty entertaining.
70's: hey, it's the kid that was the front man for the Jackson 5. Wow, he's pretty good.
80's: Oh my god, it's Micheal! *THUD* (person faints from seeing the most famous, polarizing human being on the planet during that decade who was also ridiculously talented)
90's: Micheal Jackson... he sure has had a lot of surgery... and he keeps acting weirder and weirder...
2000's: Micheal who? Oh yeah, he's still around? What crazy shit did he do this time?
Pretty sad ending, but I think it was pretty clear to everyone over the last several years that it was going to go down this kind of road.
I don't believe in sugar coating someone's life just because they died. I am not pulling these things out of thin air, there are a lot of documented cases.
Just because the guy was a celebrity doesn't mean we should just talk about the wonderful things they did and avoid the nasty.
If OJ dies will we talk about his football and not the fact that he was a murderer?
If George W Bush dies will we talk only about the right things he did as president and not that he was probably the worst president ever?
They made a movie about Dillinger comitting murder and robbing banks. He is dead and can't defend himself.
We talk about what many people "probably" did after their deaths and they never faced a conivction or even sometimes a trial. It isn't pointless or wrong, it is an attempt to keep an accurate history.
I don't like to stand by and watch all these people say how great Michael Jackson was. He had a lot of problems and even financially screwed a lot of people. Ask the former employees that never got paid.
"Farrah Fawcett arrived at the Pearly Gates and God asked her what he could do for her having led such an honest life. Farrah asked God to simply make sure the children of the world were safe. Five minutes later, Michael Jackson died"
May be some truth this... Didn't Farrah die just an hour or two before MJ.. And travel time to the pearly gates is?
He's weird and maybe a pedo.
Fantastic.
I guess then I am correct in stating as fact that you obviously served on the juries for Truscott, Morin, and Milgaard.
Let the dead lie, says I . . .
15 hrs 28 minutes to the pearly gates according to google maps.
And Farrah died about 12hrs + before.
So if traffic is good, the timeline works
Nice to see you resort to name calling on a debate you were not a part of.
So I am stupid because I beleive that Michael Jackson was a pedophile and I will not mourn his death?
To Moose:
No I wasn't on those juries. That's my point, you can't always trust the verdicts in courts of law. MJ was was found not guilty and I think he was. OJ was found not guilty and I think he was.
There is a whole list of people that have been found guilty and they weren't. A lot are still in jail. That's not my point.
I asked you to prove it. You have no proof. You responded stating things as facts, including OJ as examples. You have no facts. You may believe anything you want. What you or I believe is irrelevant. Stating someone is something without proof is wrong. I brought out Morin, Milgaard, and Truscott as examples of people convicted of murder and paedophilia by people like you who had access to a lot more proof than you and yet were still wrong. Many people held the same attitudes toward them as you do and were PROVEN wrong. I never said you were wrong. I never disagreed with you. I simply asked for proof and you have none. Until you do, stating things as facts is wrong.