single sng hand

it was still first level. therefore i don't really have a read on anyone yet (i think it was literally 3rd hand in).

Full Tilt Poker Game #3855479239: $5 + $0.50 Sit & Go (29354495), Table 1 - 15/30 - No Limit Hold'em - 18:15:09 ET - 2007/10/14
Seat 1: Big Dog Kujo (1,755)
Seat 2: spazm6666 (1,545)
Seat 3: papatop (1,500)
Seat 4: m_dolens (1,470)
Seat 5: rs19ls11 (1,500)
Seat 6: RDMJR (1,470)
Seat 7: masjas20 (1,500)
Seat 8: bullpen56 (1,500)
Seat 9: KiLlaCoSs (1,260)
m_dolens posts the small blind of 15
rs19ls11 posts the big blind of 30
The button is in seat #3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to m_dolens [As Ks]
RDMJR folds
masjas20 raises to 105
bullpen56 folds
KiLlaCoSs calls 105
Big Dog Kujo folds
spazm6666 folds
papatop calls 105
m_dolens has 15 seconds left to act
m_dolens calls 90
rs19ls11 folds
*** FLOP *** [2h 6d Qc]
m_dolens checks
masjas20 bets 450
KiLlaCoSs folds
papatop folds
m_dolens folds
Uncalled bet of 450 returned to masjas20
masjas20 mucks
masjas20 wins the pot (450)

what i'm curious about is how others would play this hand. should i be raising preflop? i am in worst position and therefore trying to take it down preflop is probably a good option. however, if i'm raising here i'm committing minimum 1/4 (most likely a 1/3) of my stack on the third hand with three potential callers. however, i didn't really feel like a call was a good play though. i'm leaning towards raise or fold. any opinions?
«1

Comments

  • Villain makes a 3 1/2 times BB raise preflop, so you have to put him on something, either AK or a good pair, 10s or Jacks maybe. Your AK call is alright, but I would also consider throwing a raise back at him to see where you sit...thinking up to 330.

    His bet on the flop though tells he doesn't want a caller here, so I still can't put him on anything more than Jacks, tens or AK. Since you missed the board though, you had to fold up here IMO. Still early in the game too, so I would be watching what this guys likes to play pretty closely.
  • m_dolens wrote: »
    should i be raising preflop?

    YES

    «Limpin with AK STILL causes cancer»

    Mark
  • I think your play was fine. A or K on flop check raise for value as he will prob do a cbet on any flop. If you don't hit flop you get out cheap. You have to respect a raise from his seat and just check out the flop. Low risk high potential play imo.
  • I push preflop. The play in these is so horrid that the range of hands that calls you makes it a +++EV play.
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    I push preflop. The play in these is so horrid that the range of hands that calls you makes it a +++EV play.

    Double up or get the hell out GTA? I'm not sure pushing here is the correct play.
  • How about calling and leading out on pretty much any flop. Lower risk. Same reward. Unless you want to push preflop.
  • GTA's right

    Not only do I shove, or make some absurd pot comitting raise (696, 699)..but I probably proceed to tell the table they're a bunch of pussy-b*tches if they fold. Poker DOES NOT happen at a $5.50, it's just about getting action with JJ+ A,Ks. (and I assure, she who shit-talks best gets paid)

    your alternate is playing clever poker for 45 mins and then taking the same (or worse) gamble ...I'd rather know first level that I've got the chips to dominate the tournament and spend that time adding to my lead.

    You're a guy..try gay-come ons...I'm pretty sure the american's would go CRAZY!
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    GTA's right

    Not only do I shove, or make some absurd pot comitting raise (696, 699)..but I probably proceed to tell the table they're a bunch of pussy-b*tches if they fold. Poker DOES NOT happen at a $5.50, it's just about getting action with JJ+ A,Ks. (and I assure, she who shit-talks best gets paid)

    your alternate is playing clever poker for 45 mins and then taking the same (or worse) gamble ...I'd rather know first level that I've got the chips to dominate the tournament and spend that time adding to my lead.

    You're a guy..try gay-come ons...I'm pretty sure the american's would go CRAZY!

    If you want to do that, make sure you shove for 1499, otherwise the chat will be disabled on the allin. Ha ha.

    Seriously though, I normally play this very cautiously early on, just as you did, but I am starting to consider the others thinking that a shove is best. Any other kind of raise either commits you to the pot anyways or leaves you short chipped and at a disadvantage for future hands.

    Even if everyone folds to the shove, it makes you the chip leader and pretty much establishes you early on as the table captain and will make the others wary of playing with you.

    If you lose, you lose. But should you win, either preflop or by the showdown, it pretty much sets you up for the rest of the sng, making it the best play.
  • Does the low buyin warrant playing THAT aggressively? Maybe, if you had the bankroll, but even then, what the hell are you doing in a $5 game anyway? Low buyin doesn't necessarily mean play foolishly. AKs is only a drawing hand after all, why not want to see a flop? Push, and you're sure to be called by JJ+, and at this level, most likely alot worse than that too.

    I don't mind the preflop call and flop fold here.
  • I agree with GTA and Kristy...I think...The hand ranges are HUGE at this level. You want to see 5 cards not 3 and there is already some decent money in the pot. Just shove and fire up another one.
  • moose wrote: »
    ....Seriously though, I normally play this very cautiously early on

    If you can read a board, understant hand values, and squeeze maximum value out of all of your made hands, you have no reason to shove pre-flop and play for all of your chips in this spot.....you will get called by lots of weak pairs and have your life on the line in a coin flip.


    As played, I like it. A re-raise won't likely take the pot down, so see a flop and get away from your Ace high hand when you miss.
  • I decided to put up or shut up after posting, I played a $5.50 on stars..thought you guys might get a laugh out of this:

    (though it doesn't further my argument...watch the chat!)

    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    Kristy_Sea: shows [Qh Ah] (a pair of Aces)
    trebor1185: shows [Kh Kd] (a pair of Kings)
    Kristy_Sea said, "lol"
    Kristy_Sea collected 3000 from pot
    Kristy_Sea said, "sick"
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 3000 | Rake 0
    Board [5c 9c 8s 4d As]

    *********** # 6 **************
    PokerStars Game #12638851319: Tournament #64144234, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2007/10/15 - 08:39:15 (ET)
    Table '64144234 1' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: geo77 (1580 in chips)
    Seat 2: CapnVimes (1480 in chips) is sitting out
    Seat 3: Psykede (1350 in chips)
    Seat 4: trebor1185 (270 in chips)
    Seat 5: Kristy_Sea (3000 in chips)
    Seat 6: jorom (1480 in chips)
    Seat 7: jchan88Allin (1480 in chips)
    Seat 8: vanbizzo (1500 in chips)
    Seat 9: bezz301 (1360 in chips)
    jorom: posts small blind 10
    jchan88Allin: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Kristy_Sea [8d 6c]
    CapnVimes has returned
    trebor1185 said, "wast expecting that"
    jchan88Allin said, "sickening"
    vanbizzo: folds
    bezz301: calls 20
    geo77: folds
    CapnVimes: calls 20
    Psykede: calls 20
    Kristy_Sea said, "now might be a good time to mention that I'm sleeping with the dealer"
    trebor1185 said, "3 rd time 2day thats happened"
    trebor1185: folds
    Kristy_Sea: folds
    jorom: folds
    jchan88Allin: checks
    *** FLOP *** [7h 8h 4c]
    trebor1185 said, "its a ****ing joke"
    jchan88Allin: checks
    bezz301: checks
    CapnVimes: checks
    Psykede: checks
    *** TURN *** [7h 8h 4c] [6h]
    jchan88Allin: bets 40
    Kristy_Sea said, "oh don't whine..embrace the variance!"
    bezz301: folds
    CapnVimes: folds
    Psykede: folds
    trebor1185 said, "i wouldnt mind so much but its always the ****ing river card"
    jchan88Allin collected 90 from pot


    *********** # 3 **************
    PokerStars Game #12638878336: Tournament #64144234, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2007/10/15 - 08:42:14 (ET)
    Table '64144234 1' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
    Seat 1: geo77 (1560 in chips)
    Seat 2: CapnVimes (1500 in chips)
    Seat 3: Psykede (1310 in chips)
    Seat 5: Kristy_Sea (3340 in chips)
    Seat 6: jorom (1470 in chips)
    Seat 7: jchan88Allin (1530 in chips)
    Seat 8: vanbizzo (1470 in chips)
    Seat 9: bezz301 (1320 in chips)
    bezz301: posts small blind 10
    geo77: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Kristy_Sea [7s 2s]
    CapnVimes: folds
    trebor1185 [observer] said, "****ing sick"
    Psykede: folds
    Kristy_Sea: folds
    jorom: folds
    jchan88Allin: raises 40 to 60
    vanbizzo: folds
    bezz301: calls 50
    geo77: calls 40
    *** FLOP *** [Jh As 9h]
    bezz301: checks
    geo77: checks
    jchan88Allin: bets 60
    bezz301: calls 60
    trebor1185 [observer] said, "more action hands from poker stars"
    geo77: folds
    *** TURN *** [Jh As 9h] [3c]
    Kristy_Sea said, "oh no, b.l. AND a tinfoil hat?" (b.l.=bad loser)
    bezz301: bets 60
    jchan88Allin: calls 60
    *** RIVER *** [Jh As 9h 3c] [3s]
    bezz301: bets 280
    jchan88Allin: folds
    bezz301 collected 420 from pot

    PokerStars Game #12638891863: Tournament #64144234, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2007/10/15 - 08:43:45 (ET)
    Table '64144234 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
    Seat 1: geo77 (1500 in chips)
    Seat 2: CapnVimes (1500 in chips)
    Seat 3: Psykede (1310 in chips)
    Seat 5: Kristy_Sea (3340 in chips)
    Seat 6: jorom (1470 in chips)
    Seat 7: jchan88Allin (1350 in chips)
    Seat 8: vanbizzo (1470 in chips)
    Seat 9: bezz301 (1560 in chips)
    geo77: posts small blind 10
    CapnVimes: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Kristy_Sea [7s Js]
    Psykede: folds
    Kristy_Sea: folds
    jorom: folds
    jchan88Allin: folds
    vanbizzo: folds
    vanbizzo is sitting out
    bezz301: folds
    geo77: calls 10
    CapnVimes: checks
    *** FLOP *** [Kc 2c 7c]
    Kristy_Sea said, "I think that guy wants to be my baby daddy now"
    geo77: checks
    CapnVimes: checks
    *** TURN *** [Kc 2c 7c] [Th]
    trebor1185 [observer] said, "cant take it anymore thats the end of online poker for me"

    not my best work, but for having less than one coffee I'm reasonably proud of the result..and the rest of the table wanted to nail me so hard. It's a weird dynamic where they want to play..but they can't handle busting to me...I believe the world is your oyster then!
  • heh never had the balls to really do that early like that in a tournament though I DO agree there's ALOT of crap play.

    Yesterday I was playing in the hundred grand raise got KK raise 1k preflop some guy calls , flop JJ4 I go all-in he calls with QJ I'm like.. wtf are you doing calling my pf raise with that junk and he said :

    "Everyone knows that you lose more money than win with kings"


    WOAH!
    My hero.


    Anyways... just to say I wouldn't shove there... I think.
  • thanks for the comments everyone. it seems that most are divided on this question (with about half thinking push and half thinking call/fold). personally, i think it might just come down to my mood the next time i'm faced with a similar situation (however, pushing and losing in that scenario would not make me feel good. folding and waiting for a better spot i could probably live with).

    there was also a few references to how the lower limits (in this case a $5.50 SnG) tends to have a lot of idiots playing in them (and therefore causes me headaches as in the situation previously mentioned). just out of curiousity, what levels are more likely to have less of these kinds of people? is even $11 SnGs high enough? or am i looking to a larger increase like $33 and up?
  • m_dolens wrote: »
    there was also a few references to how the lower limits (in this case a $5.50 SnG) tends to have a lot of idiots playing in them (and therefore causes me headaches as in the situation previously mentioned). just out of curiousity, what levels are more likely to have less of these kinds of people? is even $11 SnGs high enough? or am i looking to a larger increase like $33 and up?
    The play is bad at all levels, that's what makes it profitable. Move up in limits, you will find some skilled players, and bad players with big wallets. And even at the $5 level, there are still plenty of skilled players who simply don't play higher limits (bankroll, boredom, etc.). Also, plenty of forumers have described this same horrendous play in live tournies, including the big $10k buy-ins.

    I can see pushing here if $5 doesn't matter to you and you just want to gamble, but not sure that it's a good poker play. I don't think the skill of a good player is that they can pick a good hand, push, and then win a race -anybody can win with a better hand, or even a coin-flip. Isn't "real poker" or the skill level in being able to know when you're beat and lay down a bigger hand, or to get somebody to fold a better hand to you? I think "real poker" is a post-flop game, and just pushing with AK pre-flop when you have a playable stack is lowering yourself to the level of the donks you are claiming to be better then...
  • beanie42 wrote: »
    I think "real poker" is a post-flop game, and just pushing with AK pre-flop when you have a playable stack is lowering yourself to the level of the donks you are claiming to be better then...

    Trevor, wasn't there just a whole thread devoted to you not knowing when to show preflop aggression...

    where you openly admitted to limping in with QQ and A-Jo and making monster calls to flip with small pairs?

    I don't think you've made a good point specific to the OP here...he can't outplay them post flop OOP. And making the players relative irrespective of buy-in is silly. ave: $109 player IS better than ave. $6 player.
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    Trevor, wasn't there just a whole thread devoted to you not knowing when to show preflop aggression...

    where you openly admitted to limping in with QQ and A-Jo and making monster calls to flip with small pairs?
    Yup. I made a pretty bad play with the 99, and to be honest, I still haven't fully come to terms with my play and the great advice in that thread yet (which is why I haven't replied yet - still thinking). As far as limping with big hands, that was to trap people, and to outplay them post-flop (which is my point here). Not sure what bringing that up proves except that I make bad plays sometimes, or am constantly learning this game.
    Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    I don't think you've made a good point specific to the OP here...he can't outplay them post flop OOP.
    Why not? You are definitely at a disadvantage OOP, but that doesn't mean you can't do anything.
    Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    And making the players relative irrespective of buy-in is silly. ave: $109 players IS better than ave. $6 player.
    My personal experience and that of others I've talked to is that the play improves slightly but not by much. This is the whole "move up to avoid bad beats" debate, and we happen to have different opinions on it.
  • Only issue I've had so far is the idea that "real poker" is post-flop....

    That's like saying "real baseball" is all pitching, or "real hockey" is all in forward players. Getting people to lay down the better hand or call with inferior hands is "real poker" regardless of the street on which it occurrs.

    Mark
  • you said it backwards Mark.

    The point is that the best defense is a good offense, I think?

    Trevor, bringing that up suggests that you still haven't integrated ideas of preflop aggression. That's all..if I just wanted to get under your skin, a god-slam would have been easier.

    Who are these others that would disagree that the ave. $109 player is better than the ave. $6 player...I want to tell them that they are retarded to their face.
  • Hrm.. let me try to re-articulate...

    "Baseball" is a combination of dozens of elements... batting, baserunning, fielding, pitching, managing, closing, etc etc...

    "Hockey" is a combination of fowards, defense, goalies, stick-handling, etc etc...

    "GOOD POKER" is a combination of reads, card selection, pre-flop, flop, turn, and river play etc etc...

    Example, most players I know would consider someone that plays any two cards (pre-flop) a fish... but they can play those 9-2o very well post flop in some occasions. I would consider someone NOT raising (a significant amount of the time) or not RE-RAISING with AK (pre-flop) playing poorly (yea yea.. circumstances blah blah).... Also, someone who never bets on the river is a poor player, someone who ALWAYS bets on the river is a poor player...

    My point is... GOOD poker is a culmination of GOOD play in ALL aspects of the game. Sure, hockey and baseball (the examples I used) have individual people specializing. so maybe something like boxing is a better example. A boxer needs strength, speed, endurance, heart etc etc... to be a GOOD boxer... Sure, he / she can SPECIALIZE, but you have to have some skills in all areas.

    Mark
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    I don't think you've made a good point specific to the OP here...he can't outplay them post flop OOP.

    I disagree with this, unless I am taking it out of context. You can definatley outplay a weaker player when you are OOP.


    Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    And making the players relative irrespective of buy-in is silly. ave: $109 player IS better than ave. $6 player.


    Someone who is super aggro pre-flop (but knows nothing about post-flop play) and who knows how to push-bot in the late stages can easily have a +ROI in $5.50's

    But, someone who can play post-flop will always have a better ROI. You can find lots of spots where you build a big enough pot with a great hand that your opponents will call large turn bets while drawing to 2 or 3 outs. This is much more +EV than shoving anything other than AA pre-flop
  • Yes you're out of context.
    Your second quote/response had absolutely nothing to do with what I said?

    I know you like to fight with me..but c'mon, you're not even trying there.
  • Sorry my post was intended to look like this...

    Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    I don't think you've made a good point specific to the OP here...he can't outplay them post flop OOP.

    I disagree with this, unless I am taking it out of context. You can definatley outplay a weaker player when you are OOP.


    Someone who is super aggro pre-flop (but knows nothing about post-flop play) and who knows how to push-bot in the late stages can easily have a +ROI in $5.50's

    But, someone who can play post-flop will always have a better ROI. You can find lots of spots where you build a big enough pot with a great hand that your opponents will call large turn bets while drawing to 2 or 3 outs. This is much more +EV than shoving anything other than AA pre-flop


    Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    And making the players relative irrespective of buy-in is silly. ave: $109 player IS better than ave. $6 player.

    QFT
  • Umm.. what's QFT?


    Mark
  • I'm in the stone-age..on dial up..I'm not going to waste the minute it would take me to look at the OP again..but from my best recollection...

    how's he gonna outplay him..check-raise? gay.

    The point is that they got to a flop where the best he can hope for is TPTK with any regularity, and even that's not the majority of the time.

    let's presume, he miracles and hits..what other hands are calling and which ones will pay off his c/r that aren't beating him?

    So you 'callers' have him gambling against a bunch of players (4?)who are probably only going to call post when winning, and I doubt the con't bet he might get out of one player a tiny fraction of the time that he hits tptk will offset the value of the pot he's likely going to take right now. There are so many in this hand that I do not believe that JJ, QQ etc. even bother to con't bet a flop with an ace or king...So way to give them all a chance to suck out on you for cheap.

    If called preflop he's almost always flipping. IF called..I'm dozing off.
  • There are so many players that would stack-off with AQ or AJ in a $5.50 SNG that it is prolly the rule more than an exception.


    ...or the ass end of a QJ10 flop.


    ...or who will call a flop bet when they are on a draw and then put their whole stack in there behind when you check the turn to them.


    ...or call the turn and the river chasing the flush and then push the rest of their chips in on the river because all they are holding is a busted draw and, OMG LOOK AT ALL THOSE CHIPS IN THE MIDDLE AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY I CAN WIN'EM.
  • DrTyore wrote: »
    Umm.. what's QFT?


    Mark


    Quoted For Truth
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    I'm in the stone-age..on dial up..I'm not going to waste the minute it would take me to look at the OP again..but from my best recollection...

    how's he gonna outplay him..check-raise? gay.

    The point is that they got to a flop where the best he can hope for is TPTK with any regularity, and even that's not the majority of the time.

    let's presume, he miracles and hits..what other hands are calling and which ones will pay off his c/r that aren't beating him?

    So you 'callers' have him gambling against a bunch of players (4?)who are probably only going to call post when winning, and I doubt the con't bet he might get out of one player a tiny fraction of the time that he hits tptk will offset the value of the pot he's likely going to take right now. There are so many in this hand that I do not believe that JJ, QQ etc. even bother to con't bet a flop with an ace or king...So way to give them all a chance to suck out on you for cheap.

    If called preflop he's almost always flipping. IF called..I'm dozing off.

    You've been drinking on your meds again, haven't you? ;)
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    I'd rather know first level that I've got the chips to dominate the tournament and spend that time adding to my lead.
    And how did that big stack work out for you?
  • lol, fair enough..but I took it AJ style thrice. It was flukey
Sign In or Register to comment.