Run it twice

I was watching this weeks High Stakes Poker tonight and during a hand between Neganeau and Elezra after the flop DN said to run it twice.

They then proceeded to show the turn and river cards twice.

Is this some sort of prop bet? I've never seen this before.

Hobbes

Comments

  • No. THis is standard cash-game practice, you can make any arrangements you like. Win both take the pot, win 1 split. It's a way of decreasing variance in near coinflip situations. You will notice on the show that some bad decisions are made due to players having short buy-ins/rolls for that game and taking the worst of it by running twice when they are favourites.
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    You will notice on the show that some bad decisions are made due to players having short buy-ins/rolls for that game and taking the worst of it by running twice when they are favourites.

    there is no "taking the worst of it" when running it twice, the EV is exactly the same whether you run it once, twice, ten times, or forty times. All running it more than once does is reduce variance.
  • When they make Prop Bets what are they betting if they are not in the hand?

    Flop is all black, or all red

    How many face cards on the flop

    any ideas?
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    You will notice on the show that some bad decisions are made due to players having short buy-ins/rolls for that game and taking the worst of it by running twice when they are favourites.

    there is no "taking the worst of it" when running it twice, the EV is exactly the same whether you run it once, twice, ten times, or forty times. All running it more than once does is reduce variance.

    not true, the used cards are now dead...think about it
  • djalikool wrote:
    When they make Prop Bets what are they betting if they are not in the hand?

    Flop is all black, or all red

    How many face cards on the flop

    any ideas?

    they bet on specific flops, ie K43, but win a smaller bet if only 2 of their picks come out, (Im pretty sure) DN wrote about it in his blog a while ago, google search should turn it up pretty quickly.
  • Props and running it twice etc...are very very common things. This is weird. It is like everyone only plays online or something.

    Props have many variations. A common one works like this:

    only 4 people at the table can play.
    You pick a rank and a suit. Each person has a different rank and suit. Usually 2-9 only.
    If you pick the eight of spades and it flops you get two to one usually. So if you are playing $1 props you get $2. If you flop an eight you get one to one odds, so $1. If the flop comes down all spades but no eight, you get 3-1 I believe. If it has the eight you get 3-1 + 2-1. If it is a straight flush you get 5-1, straight flush with your eight, 5-1 + 2-1. You probably get the idea.

    If you have an action junkie beside you, playing two person dominant color props is fun. You pick red or black preflop. Always the same amount, say $5. If you pick red and 2 of the 3 cards are read you get $5. Loser picks color next round, or you play with the same color all game.

    Props are fun!!!
  • Quote from: CrazyJoe113 on Today at 02:26:49 AM
    Quote from: GTA Poker on August 30, 2006, 10:56:50 PM
    You will notice on the show that some bad decisions are made due to players having short buy-ins/rolls for that game and taking the worst of it by running twice when they are favourites.


    there is no "taking the worst of it" when running it twice, the EV is exactly the same whether you run it once, twice, ten times, or forty times. All running it more than once does is reduce variance.


    not true, the used cards are now dead...think about it

    The dead cards I think change very little in the way of things (although I've bounced this around a few times). If there is a difference, it's minimal.

    Eg, I recall "running it twice" once in a home game (I agreed to induce a call). I had AA, the other guy had a smaller pair. It ended up chopped. I was thinking I got a raw deal, because the odds of him hitting his 2 outer over 10 cards is a lot higher. Which of course is true. If you figure I'm a 4:1 favourite each go, I have about a 64% chance to win, a 32% chance to chop and only a 4% chance of losing. A lot of times, people only see it as "I'll win a lot less frequently", but it's also true that they'll rarely lose the pot (which will occur 1 in 5 times the other way). And yes, I'm aware that if the first 5 cards miss the smaller pair then the deck is more likely to hit him the 2nd time. But if he does catch a 2 outer on the first run, he now is drawing to a single out, so this offsets this.

    I think ScottyZ needs to do some math and show this more concretely (I couldn't do a proof to save my life, I just try to apply it, hence engineering over math).
  • the ev is exactly the same running it once (ie not running it at all) running it twice, thrice or any number of times.

    there is an advantage to refusing to run it, in that your opponents might throw away very slightly +ev coinflips because they dont want to have the variance.
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    GTA Poker wrote:
    You will notice on the show that some bad decisions are made due to players having short buy-ins/rolls for that game and taking the worst of it by running twice when they are favourites.

    there is no "taking the worst of it" when running it twice, the EV is exactly the same whether you run it once, twice, ten times, or forty times. All running it more than once does is reduce variance.

    not true, the used cards are now dead...think about it

    There may be psychological EV to not running it twice, ie the other player may not want to make a big loose cal against a player known not to run it twice

    Else, the math is correct, the EV is the same.

    Example:
    5c 5s vs Ac Ks

    board: Qh 9d 3h 2d; runing it twice (ie 2 river cards); Pot is 10K
    Running it once: 55 has 38/44($8636.36) ; AK has 6/44 ($1363.64)

    Running it twice;
    55 to win: 38/44 x 37/43 ($10000) = $7431.28
    chance to tie (38/44) (6/43) + (6/44)(38/43) <--= same 0.24 (x $5000, split pot) = ($1205.08)
    AK to win: 6/44 x 5/43 ($10000) = $158.56

    Overall Equity:
    55: $8636.36
    AK: $1363.64

    So obv the math works out to know difference in EV (why else would Pros/Mathematical players like BG give up free equity). BG has given Hellmuth insurance on a hand because he was getting more equity than he deserved on the deal.
  • I thought running it twice meant running two full boards, not just the river.

    And I agree with GTA that the EV is exactly the same and the variance is just reduced.

    /g2
  • I'm not sure what I said before, but I agree with whatever is the right answer.
  • g2 wrote:
    I thought running it twice meant running two full boards, not just the river.

    And I agree with GTA that the EV is exactly the same and the variance is just reduced.

    /g2

    Maybe it depends on where yoy are in the hand????
    I think the flop had already come out when they agreed to run it twice.
    In this case it was the Turn/River cards that they ran twice.

    Hobbes
  • Pretty sure that running ti twice is only applicable to the turn and river.
  • nope, you can run the whole board 2x if you want to, or 3x, or watever. Im pretty sure it was done once on HSP, i think it was farhas AA vs Matasows TT aipf/\.
  • why the fuck would an AA run it more than once unless to entice a player to call the all in plrefop, but even it seems like a bad move.
  • why the fuck would an AA run it more than once unless to entice a player to call the all in plrefop, but even it seems like a bad move.
    I guess your AA always holds up.

    /g2
  • Too Bad We Can't Have This Option At A MTT?...lol
Sign In or Register to comment.