On line Data bases

AcidJoe

How good are the on line data bases. I reviewed sharkscope for me and it has me as a winning player on poker.com and a serious fish on Pokerstars. My poker.com stats are kept by me and are accurate, my stars stats are both kept by me and imported into poker tracker. While I am suffering from the river stars jinx or whatever (it's the only site I lose money at), the stats on sharkscope are just wrong. It has me as losing serious money over about 31 sng's. I have played more than triple that according to PT and my stats. While losing there it's nowhere near what it says. Anyone else noticed these things.

Irah

thepokerdb is the most reliable source IMO. I think sharkscope is a joke. Although, I pay for my subscription at thepokerd, so i may be a bit biased.

Hobbes

I don't put too much faith in these.
You may be a loosing player on one site (hmmmmm....Party Poker lets say), but a winning player on a site that is not tracked.


BTW pkrfce9 has an ROI of 11% and is shown as a loosing player. :fish:

Hobbes

Dick Hertz

Irah

How much is the pokerdb subsciption and what additonal info does this provide?

westside8

The pokerdb is a free service. It provides the number in ITM finishes a player has in MTTs (not SnGs), what place they finished in that particular MTT, and how much was the payout. They will also provide the total "life-time earning" from MTTs from that particular player as well as the number of final tables they've made.

Dick Hertz

I know about the free site. Pokerdb also has a paid subscription area that has info not available in the free site.

GTA Poker

You can't compare thepokerdb and sharkscope -- one is for MTTs and one for SNGs.

Thepokerdb is the definitive soure for MTT results at this time.

I guess the paid service on Sharkscope would be decent, but the free service is awful as you can't focus on the limits and timeframe that you want -- also, they focus on sites that aren't in the big 5 (other than stars).