Proof That Online Poker Is Not Rigged (Bad Beats Within)

A few years back, before I had alot of live hands under my belt, I would sometimes question the integrity of online poker.

If you don't want to read my bad beats, these are all bad beats, close this window now.

Ok, you've been warned twice, so here goes.

As a service to all of you in the position of questioning the deal in online poker, here are some hands from a live session last night. Limit is irrelevant. Location is irrelevant. At all times the table is 6-8 handed, which is relevant as made hands should hold up more with less players. I will not post the details, but suffice it to say that I play very aggressively at a short table and bet, raised and reraised where appropriate.

1. We are 6 handed, I open raise from cutoff with Q7s, button and BB call. Flop is Q73 rainbow and I lose to 72... to a flush.

2. Me K5 diamonds, other guy (ok, it was Johnny T -- now, this is the Johnny T I remember) A9 diamonds. Flop 562 with one diamond, I lose to the nut flush after having 3 bets called cold on the flop.

3. HU in the blinds. My BB is raised and I call with JTo. Flop 45J rainbow, flop 4 bet (no cap HU), turn 6, river 7. I lose to 67o.

4. Now this was the last one, and the worst. We are 5 handed at this point. I open raise A8s in diamonds. 2 callers. Flop 823 with 2 diamonds and the 8 clubs. Button calls 2 bets cold and I lose to a flush, T7clubs.

Trust me, there were more.

On the upside, there is 0% interest and no service fee on my money while these guys hold it for me.

So, care to post your online bad beats? :D

Comments

  • I forgot one...

    22, flop 26k rainbow...lose to a bike...

    woot!
  • Not sure that I agree that K5s losing to A9s is a bad beat GTA.
    A9 seems to me to be favored preflop with at least 6 + 1.5 outs after the flop and 15 outs on the turn. If A9 had lost, that might be a bad beat..In your other examples you were favored pre-flop and only lost on the river. In this you had a "lucky" flop.
    Omega
  • omega23 wrote:
    Not sure that I agree that K5s losing to A9s is a bad beat GTA.
    A9 seems to me to be favored preflop with at least 6 + 1.5 outs after the flop and 15 outs on the turn. If A9 had lost, that might be a bad beat..In your other examples you were favored pre-flop and only lost on the river. In this you had a "lucky" flop.
    Omega

    Before any one else post it.......

    YAWN......

    My co-workers and get into this discussion often, what is a bad beat?......is a bad beat going in pre-flop with the worst hand, hitting the flop (giving you the best hand at the moment) but then losing on the river or going in pre-flop with the best hand and getting beat on the end?
  • Here it goes,I'll give you one of my on-line Bad beats. I was playing 5/10 nl. In the BB dealt 9To, get 5 limpers in so I check.Flop comes 678 rainbow.I check ,guy next to me bets 70$ gets one call and the rest fold to me.there is allready 200$ in the pot so I raise all in roughly 650$ ,both guys call. turn brings a 6 .first to act bets all in and other guy calls bringing the total pot to about $3100. river is a 2. First guy to my left has pocket 8's other guy wins with pocket 6's.I almost wanted to puke!!!
  • Not sure how others, look at it but I think a bad beat is losing after being a favorite when the majority of the money went in.
    Example If the SB has 22 and the BB has kk both players just put in the blinds.
    Flop has 2 7 J rainbow. If the SB goes all in and gets called and then loses on the turn or river it is a bad beat.
    However if they both were to go all in pre-flop and then the above occurrs, or they both check and then they both go all in once a k turns up it is just a tough loss.
  • Here it goes,I'll give you one of my on-line Bad beats. I was playing 5/10 nl. In the BB dealt  9To, get 5 limpers in so I check.Flop comes 678 rainbow.I check ,guy next to me bets 70$ gets one call and the rest fold to me.there is allready 200$ in the pot so I raise all in roughly 650$ ,both guys call. turn brings a 6 .first to act bets all in  and other guy calls bringing the total pot to about $3100. river is a 2. First guy to my left has pocket 8's other guy wins with pocket 6's.I almost wanted to puke!!!

    very unfortunate for you...but bad beat, not a chance.
  • This is the worst bad beat that I've had and that I've ever read about, It doesn't bother me, just thought I'd share.

    1-table sit n' go

    I move all-in preflop aggressively against a large stack (he's passive and cautious). I'm just under average stack size but I have more than what I started with, and I needed the blinds here. Regardless, I have ATc he has 88.

    Flop: KcQhJc ( I have nut straight with a royal flush draw )

    Turn: 8

    River: 8

    He was 2% to win on the flop, but 20% on the river.
  • redoak181 wrote:
    This is the worst bad beat that I've had and that I've ever read about, It doesn't bother me, just thought I'd share.

    1-table sit n' go

    I move all-in preflop aggressively against a large stack (he's passive and cautious). I'm just under average stack size but I have more than what I started with, and I needed the blinds here. Regardless, I have ATc he has 88.

    Flop: KcQhJc ( I have nut straight with a royal flush draw )

    Turn: 8

    River: 8

    He was 2% to win on the flop, but 20% on the river.

    I think he was almost 100% on the river
  • haha, that's right man. I meant turn :D
  • Funny, I was just reading this post and this happened to me.........F#$(ing Stars.....

    PokerStars Game #5561179523: Tournament #27707516, $2.00+$0.20 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2006/07/14 - 21:54:28 (ET)
    Table '27707516 44' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
    Seat 1: allitta (1500 in chips)
    Seat 2: Homerbuddy (1460 in chips)
    Seat 3: SRBMS1115 (2340 in chips)
    Seat 4: mike021880 (1690 in chips)
    Seat 5: nateofdeath (350 in chips)
    Seat 6: allin3421 (2940 in chips)
    Seat 7: cokemancoke (1440 in chips)
    Seat 8: TableCrasher (1430 in chips)
    Seat 9: jhdvs (1430 in chips)
    jhdvs: posts small blind 10
    allitta: posts big blind 20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Homerbuddy [Ac Ad]
    Homerbuddy: raises 60 to 80
    SRBMS1115: folds
    mike021880: calls 80
    nateofdeath: raises 270 to 350 and is all-in
    allin3421: calls 350
    cokemancoke: folds
    TableCrasher: folds
    jhdvs: folds
    allitta: folds
    Homerbuddy: raises 1110 to 1460 and is all-in
    mike021880: folds
    allin3421: calls 1110
    *** FLOP *** [Qh 9d 5s]
    *** TURN *** [Qh 9d 5s] [4s]
    *** RIVER *** [Qh 9d 5s 4s] [Qs]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    Homerbuddy: shows [Ac Ad] (two pair, Aces and Queens)
    allin3421: shows [9h 9s] (a full house, Nines full of Queens)
    allin3421 collected 2220 from side pot
    nateofdeath: shows [Ah Qd] (three of a kind, Queens)
    nateofdeath is sitting out
    allin3421 collected 1160 from main pot
    BARTENDER10_ is connected
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 3380 Main pot 1160. Side pot 2220. | Rake 0
    Board [Qh 9d 5s 4s Qs]
    Seat 1: allitta (big blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 2: Homerbuddy showed [Ac Ad] and lost with two pair, Aces and Queens
    Seat 3: SRBMS1115 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: mike021880 folded before Flop
    Seat 5: nateofdeath showed [Ah Qd] and lost with three of a kind, Queens
    Seat 6: allin3421 showed [9h 9s] and won (3380) with a full house, Nines full of Queens
    Seat 7: cokemancoke folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 8: TableCrasher (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: jhdvs (small blind) folded before Flop
  • Worst beat I've ever seen, not because of the odds but more because of how it happened.  I was a witness -- 10/20 Brantford.
     
    Preflop.  EP raises (he's on tilt), two callers and Button re-raises, EP caps and four of them see the flop.  Flop is TTT.  EP bets, call, call, button raises, EP re-raises, fold, fold, Button calls.  Turn is a king.  EP bets, Button thinking he hit the jackpot raises -- yes he has KK, and they go something like five bets before the EP slows down and has one final BB in front of him.

    River is a T.  EP bets and Button makes a crying call.  EP turns over A5o.  Button leaves asking directions for the nearest bridge.

    Cheers
    Magi
  • redoak181 wrote:
    This is the worst bad beat that I've had and that I've ever read about, It doesn't bother me, just thought I'd share.

    1-table sit n' go

    I move all-in preflop aggressively against a large stack (he's passive and cautious).  I'm just under average stack size but I have more than what I started with, and I needed the blinds here.  Regardless, I have ATc he has 88.

    Flop:  KcQhJc  ( I have nut straight with a royal flush draw )

    Turn: 8

    River: 8

    He was 2% to win on the flop, but 20% on the river.
    That's no bad beat, he was the favorite when you got all the money in, albeit a small favorite but still the favorite. If you had said you had got most of the money in on the flop and he called with the 8's then I would agree but in this situation no bad beat.
  • compuease wrote:
    redoak181 wrote:
    This is the worst bad beat that I've had and that I've ever read about, It doesn't bother me, just thought I'd share.

    1-table sit n' go

    I move all-in preflop aggressively against a large stack (he's passive and cautious).  I'm just under average stack size but I have more than what I started with, and I needed the blinds here.  Regardless, I have ATc he has 88.

    Flop:  KcQhJc  ( I have nut straight with a royal flush draw )

    Turn: 8

    River: 8

    He was 2% to win on the flop, but 20% on the river.
    That's no bad beat, he was the favorite when you got all the money in, albeit a small favorite but still the favorite. If you had said you had got most of the money in on the flop and he called with the 8's then I would agree but in this situation no bad beat.
    Agreed... that's not a bad beat at all.  It's a coin flip you thought you were going to win based on the flop, but then didn't.  The only way it would have been a bad beat is if you has gotten the majority of your money in on the flop.  Especially if he CALLED your all-in on that flop.

    /g2
  • It has nothing to do when the money was put in, a bad beat is just "the situation in which a strong hand is beaten by a longshot or improbable hand". In this case the situation was on the flop and later beaten on the river, yeah it was destined to...but the improbable hand on the flop succeeded, hence...the bad beat.
  • redoak181 wrote:
    It has nothing to do when the money was put in, a bad beat is just "the situation in which a strong hand is beaten by a longshot or improbable hand". In this case the situation was on the flop and later beaten on the river, yeah it was destined to...but the improbable hand on the flop succeeded, hence...the bad beat.
    What?

    If you use that definition and the way you describe it, almost any hand could be a bad beat if you look at it at the right time (after the flop in your hand's case).

    /g2
  • That's kinda correct, provided that the beat involves a "highly" improbable hand to ultimately win. Bad beats are existent regardless of bets and location on the board - they are solely dependent upon improbability and odds (or more accurately, the ability to overcome high improbability).
  • How do live bad beats prove that online poker is not rigged? I see no proof here that Stars is not rigged. :D:D:D (for Monteroy)
Sign In or Register to comment.