SnG Hand for Analysis

Stars $10+1, down to 4 players. All 4 players have approx. 3K in chips (Higest at 3.6, lowest at 3). Blinds 100/200. This table has been very tight, first elimination came at 50/100 level.

Hero on the button with 10Qo and raised to 600. Villain in the BB calls.
Read on villain is that he/she tends to overvalue starting hands preflop, but otherwise haven't gone to been caught bluffing or show down weak hands.

Flop KJ4 rainbow.
Villain checks, hero bets 800, and villain ponders for a little bit and makes it 1800 total. (raise of 1000)
Villain has a stack of around 800 left which covers hero.

At this point, I was sure I have 8 clean outs (4xA, 4x9), and possibly 3 other outs (Qs). Throwing this hand away would leave hero at around 1700, not bad but blinds are up in a hand or two. It was either a fold or push situation, and pushing here will definitely get a call. So how would you play this hand?

Personally, the only way I might've played this differently is take the freecard, as any card that comes can only help me and not necessarily hurt me. Thoughts?

Comments

  • Smells like 2 par to me. Maybe a small set.

    Playing to win? Then shove'm in. (Hey that rhymed!)

    Seriously, you probally should have taken the free card, but since you acted first, then finish it with your eyes closed and fingers crossed :D.

    If you ditch the hand, you're left with the others just trying to blind to you out.

    Just my humble but fishy opinion.

    JohnnieH
  • I would have taken the free card.

    If the table is as tight as you say it is, I'd fold to the re-raise and steal my way back into it.
  • Throwing this hand away would leave hero at around 1700, not bad but blinds are up in a hand or two.

    Can you clarify which level the blinds are at (I know you said 100-200). But on Stars you're either on the first 100-200 (no ante) and the next level would be 100-200 with a 25 ante. If the next level just adds the ante, you might be able to fold and steal. If it's going to 200-400 though, I think I'd push and take the favourable odds the pot is laying you (if you push you're getting roughly 3:1 on what is roughly a 3:1 draw). If you fold and the blinds stay at 100-200 witht the 25 ante, you still have some fold equity with an M of a little over 4. If it's 200-400 you're crippled though and are going to get called.
  • ScoobyD wrote:
    Throwing this hand away would leave hero at around 1700, not bad but blinds are up in a hand or two.

    Can you clarify which level the blinds are at (I know you said 100-200). But on Stars you're either on the first 100-200 (no ante) and the next level would be 100-200 with a 25 ante. If the next level just adds the ante, you might be able to fold and steal. If it's going to 200-400 though, I think I'd push and take the favourable odds the pot is laying you (if you push you're getting roughly 3:1 on what is roughly a 3:1 draw). If you fold and the blinds stay at 100-200 witht the 25 ante, you still have some fold equity with an M of a little over 4. If it's 200-400 you're crippled though and are going to get called.

    It is the 100-200 level with no ante.
  • You're getting almost 3:1 on the rest of your stack so you're pretty pot-committed, and I don't think it really matters how you get them in the middle that much. I tend to always bet in these situations too but this was probably a good spot to take the free card since there's a good chance he hit that board and the stack sizes are awkward. You never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now? :D
  • you're getting better than 3 to 1, just shove, if villain tends to overvalue starting hands they could have anything... in this spot i might think that if you hit your queen you could be good, villain could have any range of hands... for some reason to me this check-raise on the flop seems a little weird i haven't quite got my finger on it, but i know something was up... as sirwatts said "you never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now?"
  • SirWatts wrote:
    You never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now? :D
    specialK wrote:
    "you never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now?"

    You're not supposed to tell the world that I'm a calling station! :rage:
  • westside8 wrote:
    SirWatts wrote:
    You never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now? :D
    specialK wrote:
    "you never fold your draws when you're not getting the odds so why would you fold now?"

    You're not supposed to tell the world that I'm a calling station! :rage:

    i'm pretty sure this information is readily available before you even sit down at the table... you might want to avoid saying things like "i'm a calling station" if you don't want people to know you're a calling station... just a thought :D
  • You and Brad are the ones that say that man...I just sit there and say nothing :D
  • don't try to blame it on me and pinhead, it's not our fault you call every bet thrown into any pot... maybe we say it but you're the one that does it... is this going to work for other things, like you giving us money and other things of that natur?
  • I'm not the one calling everything in stud :D

    Anyways...think we need to get back to the hand at hand...
  • yes, i've had enough of your man flirting anyway
  • westside8 wrote:
    You and Brad are the ones that say that man...I just sit there and say nothing :D

    ....except "Call"....

    Getting back to the hand, I probably check behind too, but I've also been known to bet at this flop
    hoping the BB will just fold.

    As you have already bet and been raised, you are getting better than the odds needed to hit the draw
    (and it is a draw to the nuts - no flush draws out there so at least 8 clean outs) so I'd stick my money in there too
    ...and of course be pissed after the draw missed and I bubbled
  • Call.

    ScoobyD: I just noticed your "title"... LPLLHEetc. Way too funny dude.
  • ScoobyD: I just noticed your "title"... LPLLHEetc.

    Thanks, I think this forum has turned me into an acronym whore. Meh, all for the sake of brevity I guess...
  • My thoughts...

    No-limit (PL even moreso) is often about manipulating the size of the pot. In this case...
    Flop KJ4 rainbow.
    Villain checks, hero bets 800...

    There is now 2100 in the pot. If you get checkraised you will be offered a call of 1800 into a pot of 4700 which is going to be an automatic call.

    In the actual hand he checkraises less than your full stack and you are facing a call of 1000 into 3900 which you cannot pass up on.

    My point is that the decision point in the hand is when you make your flop bet, NOT when he check raises you. The pot is getting too big and you will be forced to call if your opponents wants to play for all the bananas.

    Do I want to play for all the marbles? Yes, I think I am willing too. I have a big draw and position. I probably simply move in on the flop. If he calls, OK, I have outs. If he doesn't call, even better. The problem with the small bet is that it invites trouble and you are going to have to call anyway.
Sign In or Register to comment.