River question
Another "what would you do on the river" question from me... I gues it's pretty obvious which street I think I have the most trouble with.
NL Texas Hold'em $200 Buy-in + $15 Entry Fee Trny:19950170 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Tuesday, February 07, 16:14:00 EDT 2006
Table Table 67034 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: GAMBLE711 ( $650 )
Seat 3: SPANFERKELIN ( $1165 )
Seat 4: BROOKLYNBUM ( $510 )
Seat 5: LEORANDOS ( $1015 )
Seat 8: awmahn ( $760 )
Seat 2: tommyt114 ( $960 )
Seat 7: Aces_All ( $1770 )
Seat 10: pritzker ( $1140 )
Seat 6: BennettF3 ( $610 )
Seat 9: KIRKKOLA ( $1420 )
Trny:19950170 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Aces_All [Â Jh Kh ]
SPANFERKELIN folds.
BROOKLYNBUM folds.
LEORANDOS calls [50].
BennettF3 calls [50].
Aces_All calls [50].
awmahn folds.
KIRKKOLA folds.
pritzker folds.
GAMBLE711 calls [25].
tommyt114 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 8c, 8d, 9s ]
GAMBLE711 checks.
tommyt114 checks.
LEORANDOS checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All checks.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Kd ]
GAMBLE711 checks.
tommyt114 checks.
LEORANDOS checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All bets [200].
GAMBLE711 folds.
tommyt114 calls [200].
LEORANDOS folds.
BennettF3 calls [200].
** Dealing River ** [ 2s ]
tommyt114 checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All ?
Any feedback appreciated.
NL Texas Hold'em $200 Buy-in + $15 Entry Fee Trny:19950170 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Tuesday, February 07, 16:14:00 EDT 2006
Table Table 67034 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: GAMBLE711 ( $650 )
Seat 3: SPANFERKELIN ( $1165 )
Seat 4: BROOKLYNBUM ( $510 )
Seat 5: LEORANDOS ( $1015 )
Seat 8: awmahn ( $760 )
Seat 2: tommyt114 ( $960 )
Seat 7: Aces_All ( $1770 )
Seat 10: pritzker ( $1140 )
Seat 6: BennettF3 ( $610 )
Seat 9: KIRKKOLA ( $1420 )
Trny:19950170 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Aces_All [Â Jh Kh ]
SPANFERKELIN folds.
BROOKLYNBUM folds.
LEORANDOS calls [50].
BennettF3 calls [50].
Aces_All calls [50].
awmahn folds.
KIRKKOLA folds.
pritzker folds.
GAMBLE711 calls [25].
tommyt114 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 8c, 8d, 9s ]
GAMBLE711 checks.
tommyt114 checks.
LEORANDOS checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All checks.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Kd ]
GAMBLE711 checks.
tommyt114 checks.
LEORANDOS checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All bets [200].
GAMBLE711 folds.
tommyt114 calls [200].
LEORANDOS folds.
BennettF3 calls [200].
** Dealing River ** [ 2s ]
tommyt114 checks.
BennettF3 checks.
Aces_All ?
Any feedback appreciated.
Comments
I think when you weigh the odds of everyone missing draws and betting with no callers vs someone check raising a monster a call is the way to go.
The only hand that may pay you off is a worse K, not very likely or someone with a 9, although there was no feeler bet on the flop so not very likely.
so what's the point of a bet, they either fold or raise you
I wouldn't be too surprised if tommyt114 shows up with a slowplayed 8 from the BB.
This is a good example of a hand where the buy-in matters. You might expect to be able to make a value bet on the river in a smaller stakes SNG.
ScottyZ
Here's the rest of the hand:
Aces_All checks.
tommyt114 shows [ 7s, Ts ] a pair of eights.
BennettF3 shows [ 4d, Ad ] a pair of eights.
Aces_All shows [ Jh, Kh ] two pairs, kings and eights.
Aces_All wins 850 chips from the main pot with two pairs, kings and eights.
My reasoning was that I couldn't put BOTH of my opponents on being fish and calling too much to chase a draw with only one card to come. And even if they were, a missed draw won't call my bet anyways as has been pointed out. A missed draw could only fold or come over the top of me and put me to a decision that I might not feel comfortable making.