Question about tournament all-ins

I ran into this issue yesterday at GBH playing one of the $100 tournaments.

If a player goes all in, and cannot cover the minimum raise, I've always known it to be a short all-in, and therefore any player that has already called the big blind, cannot re-raise.

But then the supervisors and dealer said you can go all in and re-raise at anytime.

Say blinds are 10/20, a couple people limp in, then small blind goes all in for 21 chips, which is 1 extra chip, everyone calls then the guy on the button reraises all in, is that legal?

Cause the similar issue happened to me, I was BB with like 50 chips, blinds were 10/20, small blind goes all in for 30 chips in total, i was already in for 20, and the button had already called, so i figured since he cant reraise, it's worth it for me to put in the 10 extra chips to try to win 80chips. But then once I called, the button decides he wants to go all in now. Now if I knew he was allowed to re-raise the short allin, I would never have put in that extra 10 chips to call the all in, in the first place.

Comments

  • If the player goes all-in for less then 1/2 a legal raise, the betting is not reopened. In your example, an all-in of 29 would NOT reopen the betting. 30 was 1/2 the min bet though, so players can now raise. At least that's my understanding.
  • I'm with you on this. An allin that is short of a full raise or bet does not reopen the action to any player that has already acted.
    So in the senario you put forth, all players but the BB had acted on that betting round and since the SB's raise was less than a full raise the action is not reopened and the only player that can re-raise the SB's allin is the BB as he has not yet acted in that betting round.

    From Robert'sRules
    3. All raises must be equal to or greater than the size of the previous bet or raise on that betting round, except for an all-in wager. A player who has already acted and is not facing a fullsize wager may not subsequently raise an all-in bet that is less than the minimum bet (which is the amount of the minimum bring-in), or less than the full size of the last bet or raise. (The half-the-size rule for reopening the betting is for limit poker only.)
  • bigbadwoof wrote:
    The half-the-size rule for reopening the betting is for limit poker only.
    Yup - you're right (although you knew that :) ). I know I've discussed the 1/2 bet reopening with a number of people before, so it must be one of those "urban legends". Good question, and more importantly an accurate answer. That will straighten some of us out (like me).
  • Did you throw a tantrum? I hear that is super effective at the casino.

    I guess you could always ask before you called the bet but that may have given off a strong tell that your hand was pretty weak.
  • I did argue for a bit, but somehow their logic was that, this was "no limit" so therefore you can go all in at anytime.
  • Take this up with Lee. He posts here occasionally. Or PM him at GBHShftMgr. This may be a house rule but otherwise, you should kick their asses. They get paid to host so you should expect them to know and enforce the rules.
  • Thanks for the post and responses - it actually answers a question I had posed earlier to my friend. It all makes sense now - well, at least that now does :D
  • Hey guys,

    This Casino and just about every other Casino in North America uses TDA Rules (Tournament Directors Association), Robert's Rules while prominent in Parliament and some private clubs really do not apply. The only mention of a ½ bet in TDA Rules is, and I quote "Rule 7: Half-bet Rule: If a player puts in a raise of 50% or more of the previous bet, he will be required to make a full raise. The raise will be exactly the minimum raise allowed." The GBH uses TDA Rules for all of its Tournaments (Mini and Monthly), copies are available in the Pit for all Tournament participants.

    Cheers,

    Lee
  • Popkorn wrote:
    I ran into this issue yesterday at GBH playing one of the $100 tournaments.

    If a player goes all in, and cannot cover the minimum raise, I've always known it to be a short all-in, and therefore any player that has already called the big blind, cannot re-raise.

    But then the supervisors and dealer said you can go all in and re-raise at anytime.

    Say blinds are 10/20, a couple people limp in, then small blind goes all in for 21 chips, which is 1 extra chip, everyone calls then the guy on the button reraises all in, is that legal?

    Cause the similar issue happened to me, I was BB with like 50 chips, blinds were 10/20, small blind goes all in for 30 chips in total, i was already in for 20, and the button had already called, so i figured since he cant reraise, it's worth it for me to put in the 10 extra chips to try to win 80chips. But then once I called, the button decides he wants to go all in now. Now if I knew he was allowed to re-raise the short allin, I would never have put in that extra 10 chips to call the all in, in the first place.

    The button should never be allowed to raise here...
    GBHShftMgr wrote:
    <snip>.... The GBH uses TDA Rules for all of its Tournaments (Mini and Monthly), copies are available in the Pit for all Tournament participants.

    Rule #38 From TDA...

    38. Less than a full raise
    In no-limit and pot-limit, less than a full raise does not re-open the betting to a player who has already acted.


    Copies should be made available to more than just the participants!! ;)
  • Hey Mickey,

    In TDA rules as applied in Ontario (AGCO approved) what I said stands, we still have to apply AGCO standards as the final arbiter. All rules of play must be submitted and approved before being applied.

    Cheers,

    Lee
  • GBHShftMgr wrote:

    Hey Mickey,

    In TDA rules as applied in Ontario (AGCO approved) what I said stands, we still have to apply AGCO standards as the final arbiter.  All rules of play must be submitted and approved before being applied.

    Cheers,

    Lee
    In an earlier post, you say you follow the TDA rules. The rule you stated does not seem to cover the situation. Mickey shows you the rule from the TDA that covers it and clearly shows this raise was not allowed. Your response doesn't make sense to me.

    Please explain to the forum how your casino did not screw up here. I'm still thinking this guy got screwed and it sounds to me like you guys don't understand the rules properly. This does not encourage me to participate in your tourneys.
  • GBHShftMgr wrote:

    Hey Mickey,

    In TDA rules as applied in Ontario (AGCO approved) what I said stands, we still have to apply AGCO standards as the final arbiter. All rules of play must be submitted and approved before being applied.

    Cheers,

    Lee

    What are you trying to say here... AGCO approved TDA rules do not include rule #38... any other common rules that don't apply... maybe no betting round after the turn card or something similar?
  • Hey Mickey,

    At this time Rules 37 & 38 do not apply, but are under consideration. This is the first year of TDA Rules in Ontario, please don't misunderstand, we proposed TDA Rules and are working to implement them all. We will post any changes as they occur.

    Cheers,

    Lee
  • The GBH uses TDA Rules for all of its Tournaments (Mini and Monthly), copies are available in the Pit for all Tournament participants
    should be: The GBH uses some of the TDA Rules for all of its Tournaments (Mini and Monthly), copies are available in the Pit for all Tournament participants

    As usual, caveat emptor applies - ask for a copy of the rules before you enter any tourney.
Sign In or Register to comment.