Observations on 6-max Limit Hold 'em
Great article i found - please discuss
I rarely have played online. When I played full-time, I liked to play live games, and in Las Vegas, I had no shortage. Recently, I've started to play online a bit, and I figured I'd throw out a couple of observations I've made.
As of December, 2005, if you are already a winning player, and you play below $15-$30 on Party, you belong in 6-max games. My first-order swag is that, game for game, the 6-max games are perhaps up to twice as profitable. Here's why:
Lower per-hand rake.
More hands per hour.
Less folding - you can't make money when you have to fold.
Much softer competition.
It's not entirely clear to me why, but the players at, say, $3-$6 6-max are far weaker than those at $3-$6 full. Perhaps the action junkies are naturally drawn to the short-handed games.
I know a lot of people are scared of the short games. It's true - the variance is a bit larger at the short games. And a lot of players don't feel comfortable playing so many hands in blind steal/blind defense situations. But if you are winning consistently at the full games, I strongly suggest that you close your eyes and make the jump. A few months from now, you'll be happy.
Whatever limit you are playing full, drop down one, and try 6-max there. The swings, in absolute terms, will be lower, and your winrate likely won't suffer much at all. Then you can move up the more profitable 6-max ladder. And if you play full games after months of 6-max experience, you'll feel las if you have been running with weights on your shoes and you just took them off.
Now for a couple of tips for the aspiring 6-max player.
If They're Calling, You Should Be Betting
I've made this point several times before, but I feel it deserves repeating here because it's a critical concept for small 6-max games. The way you beat calling stations is by betting, betting, betting. Bet when you have a good hand. Bet when you have a mediocre hand. Bet when you have a not-so-good hand.
For some reason, calling stations manage to convince some aspiring players to stop betting against them. Why bet, since they are just going to call anyway? Why bet? Because that's where your edge is.
Let's take UbetIcall. This player sees 50-80% of flops (not an entirely uncommon beast at small 6-max games - see what you're missing?). UbetIcall likes to limp in preflop with stuff like 9 6. UbetIcall likes to call a single bet with that same hand on flops of AJ7. Why? Who knows.
UbetIcall will fold the turn if it's the A or 4. But if it's the T (giving him a gutshot), he'll take another card off. And if he catches a pair on the turn, he'll stick around to the end. With A4, he'll give the same action, check-call all streets. So how do you beat UbetIcall? You bet, bet, bet. Let's take the 30,000-foot view of the situation.
You play tighter than UbetIcall, so you are going to make the better hand by the river more often. You are also going to have position on him more often than you "should," since he'll happily limp under the gun or defend his blind with trash, while you are more selective in those positions. Also, UbetIcall doesn't raise, or, specifically, check-raise often enough. So his typical action will be checking and calling. When UbetIcall enters the pot in front of you, your basic strategy should be:
Attempt to isolate with a raise. Choose hands with showdown value like A4 or K9 rather than 75. UbetIcall is going to show up at the river with nine-high fairly often. Make sure you can beat it.
If isolation was successful, bet the flop.
Then bet the turn.
Then bet the river if you made a pair, and check it without one.
Obviously, this is oversimplified. Sometimes you'll be checking the turn unimproved. Sometimes you'll check the river with a small pair. Sometimes UbetIcall will show up somewhere with a raise. But after thousands of hands with him, this should be your most common pattern. So is it a winner for you?
Well, generally speaking, when you make the better hand (which will be more than half the time since you play tighter), you'll win three and a half bets: two preflop half-bets, a flop half-bet, a turn bet, and a river bet. When you don't make the better hand, you'll lose two and a half bets: two preflop half-bets, a flop half-bet, and a turn bet. Obviously, sometimes you'll check down on the river only to find out that king-high is good. And sometimes you'll bet the river to find that he did indeed flop an ace.
But over time, you'll win 3.5 on your good hands and lose 2.5 on your bad ones. That's all you need to crush him. Here's a quick example:
UbetIcall limps in. You're on the button with K7 and raise. The big blind calls, as does UbetIcall. Flop comes J52. Checked to you, and you bet. Big blind folds, and UbetIcall calls. Turn is the 7. He checks, you bet, he calls. River is the 9. He checks, you bet, he calls. Expect to see a seven with a weaker kicker, a five, a deuce, or ace- or king-high far more than a jack or nine.
Incidentally, this is another big advantage to choosing hands with showdown value. Often you will win a kicker battle on your modest pair. If you favor hands with aces and kings in them, your king-seven will often beat his ten-seven.
Anyway, don't worry too much about "betting his hand for him" when he beats you by calling down with a small pair. You bet your hand for you even more often, and you bet your hands harder. Ultimately, UbetIcall doesn't have a chance.
Confuse the Autopilot
A fair number of the "good" players at low-limit 6-max seem to play on autopilot. They play almost by formula. They can get away with it because very few players try to take advantage of it. But you should.
Particularly, many of these players seem to have "standard" folds they like to make in medium-sized pots. If you identify such a player, and anyone you think plays "well" is a potential candidate, try to create situations where he'll make a "standard," but incorrect, fold. Here's an example:
You open-raise. Autopilot 3-bets from the button. Everyone folds, and you call. The flop comes T86. You check, he bets, and you check-raise. An autopilot player with overcards will typically either fold immediately, or call and fold unimproved on the turn. Exploit that tendency. If you have K9, consider a flop check-raise. Preflop 3-bettors on autopilot hate flops like T86. Put the pressure on.
Obviously, you shouldn't spew bets indiscriminately. But a key characteristic of 6-max games is that often it will be 3-bets before the flop, a bet on the flop, and yet no one has a pair. If you snatch more than your share of these 11-bet, semi-up-for-grabs pots, you'll have a significant edge.
Good luck in the short games, and expect more 6-max and tax-related articles in the future.
http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/current/miller1205.html
I rarely have played online. When I played full-time, I liked to play live games, and in Las Vegas, I had no shortage. Recently, I've started to play online a bit, and I figured I'd throw out a couple of observations I've made.
As of December, 2005, if you are already a winning player, and you play below $15-$30 on Party, you belong in 6-max games. My first-order swag is that, game for game, the 6-max games are perhaps up to twice as profitable. Here's why:
Lower per-hand rake.
More hands per hour.
Less folding - you can't make money when you have to fold.
Much softer competition.
It's not entirely clear to me why, but the players at, say, $3-$6 6-max are far weaker than those at $3-$6 full. Perhaps the action junkies are naturally drawn to the short-handed games.
I know a lot of people are scared of the short games. It's true - the variance is a bit larger at the short games. And a lot of players don't feel comfortable playing so many hands in blind steal/blind defense situations. But if you are winning consistently at the full games, I strongly suggest that you close your eyes and make the jump. A few months from now, you'll be happy.
Whatever limit you are playing full, drop down one, and try 6-max there. The swings, in absolute terms, will be lower, and your winrate likely won't suffer much at all. Then you can move up the more profitable 6-max ladder. And if you play full games after months of 6-max experience, you'll feel las if you have been running with weights on your shoes and you just took them off.
Now for a couple of tips for the aspiring 6-max player.
If They're Calling, You Should Be Betting
I've made this point several times before, but I feel it deserves repeating here because it's a critical concept for small 6-max games. The way you beat calling stations is by betting, betting, betting. Bet when you have a good hand. Bet when you have a mediocre hand. Bet when you have a not-so-good hand.
For some reason, calling stations manage to convince some aspiring players to stop betting against them. Why bet, since they are just going to call anyway? Why bet? Because that's where your edge is.
Let's take UbetIcall. This player sees 50-80% of flops (not an entirely uncommon beast at small 6-max games - see what you're missing?). UbetIcall likes to limp in preflop with stuff like 9 6. UbetIcall likes to call a single bet with that same hand on flops of AJ7. Why? Who knows.
UbetIcall will fold the turn if it's the A or 4. But if it's the T (giving him a gutshot), he'll take another card off. And if he catches a pair on the turn, he'll stick around to the end. With A4, he'll give the same action, check-call all streets. So how do you beat UbetIcall? You bet, bet, bet. Let's take the 30,000-foot view of the situation.
You play tighter than UbetIcall, so you are going to make the better hand by the river more often. You are also going to have position on him more often than you "should," since he'll happily limp under the gun or defend his blind with trash, while you are more selective in those positions. Also, UbetIcall doesn't raise, or, specifically, check-raise often enough. So his typical action will be checking and calling. When UbetIcall enters the pot in front of you, your basic strategy should be:
Attempt to isolate with a raise. Choose hands with showdown value like A4 or K9 rather than 75. UbetIcall is going to show up at the river with nine-high fairly often. Make sure you can beat it.
If isolation was successful, bet the flop.
Then bet the turn.
Then bet the river if you made a pair, and check it without one.
Obviously, this is oversimplified. Sometimes you'll be checking the turn unimproved. Sometimes you'll check the river with a small pair. Sometimes UbetIcall will show up somewhere with a raise. But after thousands of hands with him, this should be your most common pattern. So is it a winner for you?
Well, generally speaking, when you make the better hand (which will be more than half the time since you play tighter), you'll win three and a half bets: two preflop half-bets, a flop half-bet, a turn bet, and a river bet. When you don't make the better hand, you'll lose two and a half bets: two preflop half-bets, a flop half-bet, and a turn bet. Obviously, sometimes you'll check down on the river only to find out that king-high is good. And sometimes you'll bet the river to find that he did indeed flop an ace.
But over time, you'll win 3.5 on your good hands and lose 2.5 on your bad ones. That's all you need to crush him. Here's a quick example:
UbetIcall limps in. You're on the button with K7 and raise. The big blind calls, as does UbetIcall. Flop comes J52. Checked to you, and you bet. Big blind folds, and UbetIcall calls. Turn is the 7. He checks, you bet, he calls. River is the 9. He checks, you bet, he calls. Expect to see a seven with a weaker kicker, a five, a deuce, or ace- or king-high far more than a jack or nine.
Incidentally, this is another big advantage to choosing hands with showdown value. Often you will win a kicker battle on your modest pair. If you favor hands with aces and kings in them, your king-seven will often beat his ten-seven.
Anyway, don't worry too much about "betting his hand for him" when he beats you by calling down with a small pair. You bet your hand for you even more often, and you bet your hands harder. Ultimately, UbetIcall doesn't have a chance.
Confuse the Autopilot
A fair number of the "good" players at low-limit 6-max seem to play on autopilot. They play almost by formula. They can get away with it because very few players try to take advantage of it. But you should.
Particularly, many of these players seem to have "standard" folds they like to make in medium-sized pots. If you identify such a player, and anyone you think plays "well" is a potential candidate, try to create situations where he'll make a "standard," but incorrect, fold. Here's an example:
You open-raise. Autopilot 3-bets from the button. Everyone folds, and you call. The flop comes T86. You check, he bets, and you check-raise. An autopilot player with overcards will typically either fold immediately, or call and fold unimproved on the turn. Exploit that tendency. If you have K9, consider a flop check-raise. Preflop 3-bettors on autopilot hate flops like T86. Put the pressure on.
Obviously, you shouldn't spew bets indiscriminately. But a key characteristic of 6-max games is that often it will be 3-bets before the flop, a bet on the flop, and yet no one has a pair. If you snatch more than your share of these 11-bet, semi-up-for-grabs pots, you'll have a significant edge.
Good luck in the short games, and expect more 6-max and tax-related articles in the future.
http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/current/miller1205.html
Comments
It is common knowledge that more skilled players have a greater edge shorthanded than at a full ring game.
I'm sure you can't just steal the content off another site and stick it in here..
Yeah, six-max is the place if your under $15/30 why would it not be, your getting more hands per hour typically...
The newer fishier players would think they can win more because "they'll be seeing more hands".
For example, i was in a $3/6 max game I bought in for $150. I guy to my left had $444 sitting in front of him.
He literally called down every hand, he simply did not fold. I ended up a buy-in to end my session, he was almost broke. Me and another player isolated him all session long, nobody else picked up on what we were doing. Although this is an extreame example, there are many more stories of which I can share.
Anyway, six max is awsome, it imporves your post-flop play in a hurry.
FWIW, I'm at 1.74BB/100 through a little over 10k hands at $1-2 on Stars. This is a ridiculously tiny sample though, and good/bad sessions will swing the WR massively. To be honest I haven't probably played enough hands at ANY of the limits I've played to be able to say "My WR is x". Using results to measure your play is such a fine line since the two don't ALWAYS have to correlate...but we all do it to some degree, whether we admit it or not.
Sent you an email.