stack size in limit tourneys
In no-limit tourneys, the size of one's stack is an important factor in any decision. Should stack size also be a big factor in limit tourneys? I haven't really been considering that, but it occured to me that perhaps I should. For example, if I have a big stack should I be more aggressive because I can afford to mix it up, or should I play tighter because I'm not being pressed to mix it up? What about with a small or medium stack?
Comments
And as far as raising with ai big stack etc. it completely pertains to your table. If it is passive raise and steal, if it is an awful loose table then you aren't going to be stealing many pots. So the answer as it always is, is it depends.
Anyways, good luck.
Heads up, a short stacked player betting out without position must have a made hand otherwise they are risking being raised out or put allin by the player acting last. They can't really bet out as a bluff into a higher stack. In NL a short stack can force the issue by sticking in all their chips on a bluff or semi-bluff but a limit player does not have this option.
If you are the larger stack and acting last, sometimes it is better to give a free card and make a turn bet bluff, otherwise you may pot commit a short stacked player by forcing them to call a flop bet.
How big is your stack? This will generally cause me to change my strategy. If I am small stacked I am looking for a hand. If I am medium stacked I have some room to maneuver. If I am big stacked I can deploy the high variance package (if I think table conditions warrant it).