Low Limit Holdem Hand That's Been Bothering Me

Underground 4 8 1/2 kill game, this is a 4 8 round.

....I'm not too sure how I feel about. UTG has not played a hand for 4 orbits or so (he is reading the paper) and raises UTG...6-7 callers and I have KQo in the SB and muck. I would call with 56s in this position, but KQo has too many ways of being dominated here. Of course flop is KQQ. Would have been an ok pot. I call right away with KQs, but not sure about the fold there. Obviously worried about AA, KK, QQ, AK from UTG. Turns out it was checked around on the flop, then checked on the turn by the raiser and taken down my a single turn bet when someone paired the turn card. Very strange hand for this table...

Opinions?

Comments

  • Forget the results on the flop. If your read on UTG raiser is right, good laydown. You don't have to play this hand, and you're right, it is so easily dominated.
  • I would have called.

    I rarely lay down K-Qo for a single raise in limit poker (ever since I Daniel N told me he doesn't).

    You hand will be easy to define post flop and relatively easy to get away from.

    He could be raising with J-J and then, as more and more callers enter the pot they will have wider and wider ranges of hands.

    I don't like it. I am uncomfortable. But, I am gong to see the flop.
  • I would have folded, but I play a conservative game. The chance of being dominated here is of real concern to me when I consider the UTG player and his behavior recently. It is always easy to second guess afterwards when you see a flop like this.
  • Sorry, missed the point where there are 6-7 callers... call and tread carefully on the flop.

    2 or 3 callers I still fold.
  • You hand will be easy to define post flop and relatively easy to get away from.

    I'm curious, how is it easy to get away from? If you flop your pair, the pots so big you are stuck going to the river or even peeling one off with the overcards...

    Now, I can understand wanting to call with 56s because that's a simple hand to dump when the flop misses, but I can't see the same argument for large unsuited connectors.
  • i think that i agree with bbc that it isn't that easy to get away from if you flop a pair. i think that with such a large number of callers i would have called just to see the flop, you would have to be very careful in this situationl... but if there were 4 or less callers KQo out of position becomes a much more easy to fold hand.
  • I rarely lay down K-Qo for a single raise in limit poker (ever since I Daniel N told me he doesn't).

    Really? Or are you saying you'd rarely lay it down for a single bet (ie due to the good price you're getting from being in the blinds). This specific example of the UTG raise with multiple callers, makes the pot odds very tempting to come in. Given an UTG raise (from a tight player) and being second to act, I'd say cold-calling 2 there is a recipe for disaster (especially if it gets 3 bet behind you). Just curious as to your line of thinking...
  • I will generally cold-call two with K-Qo.

    why?

    Overall I think that, if played well post-flop, K-Q will show a profit. In this case, in particular, since the game is $4-8 and since the game is playing like a typical $4-8 (6 or 7 callers of a raise) then there is some implied odds as well. K-Q will play fairly well in a multi-way pot.
  • I will generally cold-call two with K-Qo.

    why?

    Overall I think that, if played well post-flop, K-Q will show a profit. In this case, in particular, since the game is $4-8 and since the game is playing like a typical $4-8 (6 or 7 callers of a raise) then there is some implied odds as well. K-Q will play fairly well in a multi-way pot.

    But, it depends.

    This guy had been reading the paper for 45 mins or so and hadn't played a hand at all for about an hour. I have played 4 handed 10 20 before with the UTG raiser and know that he is a simple ABC player -- ie I run him over shorthanded. Most ABC players are raising QQ, KK, AA, AK, AQ in this spot, especially those reading the paper and then suddenly interested in a hand. KQs, I call. KQo is not that easy to get away from out of position and I feel could be a money loser given this set of circumstances. I don't play an especially tight game preflop, I play my cards as they relate to the current circumstances at the table, and don't generally let go of KQo for a single raise in most low limit loose situations, but this was kind of an exception due to position, player, etc...that's why it kind of nagged at me afterwards.

    I think that the implied odds are there more with lower suited connectors in this position as the risk of being dominated is taken out of the equation. Given that it's a low limit game and some people are calling down with 2nd or 3rd pair, how can you get away from this hand on a Q hi board, even if the initial raiser is taking initiative, given that there will likely be 3-4 players at showdown at times. Most of these players are weak, there aren't going to be alot of turn and river raises, so youi are stuck showing down if 3-4 players make it to the river.

    Thanks for all the feedback so far.

    Like I said, I'd rather call 1.5 bets (SB) wayyyyyyyy out of position with 56s or JTs, etc in this game...I feel that suited cards are much better in this situation.
  • GTA Poker wrote:


    Most ABC players are raising QQ, KK, AA, AK, AQ in this spot, especially those reading the paper and then suddenly interested in a hand. 

    Does it really matter what he has. Your looking to flop a monster.
  • Sure it matters, if it's a player that I know raises QTo then I call.
  • Does it really matter what he has. Your looking to flop a monster.

    The only monster you can realistically flop is two pair and thats a 50 to 1 shot. Regardless of how loose the game is, theres no way you are making up 100SB-150SB
  • You're looking to flop a monster or a straight draw. Even a gutshot on this flop will be ok since if UTG leads the flop you're almost closing the action and call if it's only 1 bet to you very profitably, then you have the possibility of a monster checkraise on the turn if you hit and UTG leads again.
  • SirWatts wrote:
    You're looking to flop a monster or a straight draw. Even a gutshot on this flop will be ok since if UTG leads the flop you're almost closing the action and call if it's only 1 bet to you very profitably, then you have the possibility of a monster checkraise on the turn if you hit and UTG leads again.

    If this is what you are realistically looking to flop, you've made a massive error by entering the pot in the first place. The combination of times you flop an inside draw sure doesn't make up for the 7 to 1 you put in preflop. If you can't play this hand when you make the K or Q you probably can't play it at all longterm profitably.
  • SirWatts wrote:
    You're looking to flop a monster or a straight draw. Even a gutshot on this flop will be ok since if UTG leads the flop you're almost closing the action and call if it's only 1 bet to you very profitably, then you have the possibility of a monster checkraise on the turn if you hit and UTG leads again.

    So in that case you call with KJo, KTo as well, correct?
  • If that's the case, then call with 76o... you're probably better off, your cards are more likely to be live. You are also more likely to flop your 776 full house and your 666 quads.

    uhh... no.
  • GTA Poker wrote:
    Sure it matters, if it's a player that I know raises QTo then I call.

    The point is that you have 6-7 callers. Your getting about 9-1 on money....easy call. Even if the utg is a donk, with 6-7 callers your still a dog and have to hit a pretty dam good flop.
  • BBC Z wrote:
    Does it really matter what he has. Your looking to flop a monster.

    The only monster you can realistically flop is two pair and thats a 50 to 1 shot.  Regardless of how loose the game is, theres no way you are making up 100SB-150SB

    Then why play hands like 67s?
  • wader wrote:
    BBC Z wrote:
    Does it really matter what he has. Your looking to flop a monster.

    The only monster you can realistically flop is two pair and thats a 50 to 1 shot. Regardless of how loose the game is, theres no way you are making up 100SB-150SB
    Then why play hands like 67s?
    Because the suitedness adds about 4-5% to your pot equity which results in a drastic reduction of the amount of bets required to make up to make the calls profitable longterm.
  • Well the draw/monster stuff in combination with the fact that TP2K will often be plenty good makes it a call. I'm just trying to point out that the pot is so big that you can't give it up preflop imo. Calling with 76o here is probably marginally -EV at worst due to your great relative position though fwiw.
  • Does it really matter what he has. Your looking to flop a monster.

    5 hours later:
    Well the draw/monster stuff in combination with the fact that TP2K will often be plenty good makes it a call.

    Ok, you changed your mind on the hand. That's fine, just don't represent it as if you didn't.
  • I didn't say does it really matter what he has.  Clearly if he has TT or JJ or QT vs AK, AQ, KK makes a huge difference.  My first post sucked, so feel free to ignore it though.  I'm not super happy about calling here due to all the domination stuff but I don't think I can fold in that pot.  edit: never folding KQ preflop would be a huge leak though, idon't care what DN says.
  • I think coldcalling a hand like KQo regularly is a mistake against known tags. Especially EP raises.
  • PokerKai wrote:
    I think coldcalling a hand like KQo regularly is a mistake against known tags. Especially EP raises.

    Uhh.. calling with a good hand in great position is a mistake? I assume you are implying a 3-bet?
  • BBC Z wrote:
    PokerKai wrote:
    I think coldcalling a hand like KQo regularly is a mistake against known tags. Especially EP raises.

    Uhh.. calling with a good hand in great position is a mistake? I assume you are implying a 3-bet?

    nope, im advocating a fold against a tag raiser with KQo. its not a good hand against the range of hands a tag is going to raise UTG.
Sign In or Register to comment.