Help with this AA play?

So here I am at a 2/5 NL game @ UTG +1. I have $30 left and get AA.

The UTG calls $5

I raise to $30 all in. fold fold fold and I win $12. I wish I had 1 or 2 callers so I could have doubled or maybe tripled up.

My buddy said I played to poorly being a short stack. He says I should have limped or min raised it. That way I get more people in the pot. I agree with him I need to maximize my gain, but I thought that if I limp in then I'd have $25 left. Now if 6 people were in the pot that would mean I'd raise the flop with $25. Let me remind you that this table is 10 handed, with some fairly loose players and chasers. I saw a guy play 9 2 suited because of pot odds (there were 5 players already in for $15) so he decided to call.

Anyways back to the hand. If i bet $25 into a $30 pot, I'd get people who chase their flush, straight, or whatever. never mind them possibly flopping 2 pairs.

So, I thought I played these right and should have hoped for 1 caller. Plus a $30 raise was not large for that loose table. I hate getting busted on aces.

Any thoughts?

Comments

  • spin by Dave Scarf's site, www.canadianpoker.com

    he's has an article on playing AA on his site.

    Sounds like you were on your way to going broke as it was...I would have limped with them, and taken my chances
    getting my money in on the flop. If your intention was to triple up...why scare everyone out of the pot pre-flop?
  • but in that instance, i wanted to limit the variance and just stay alive...
  • redlude2k wrote:
    i wanted to limit the variance and just stay alive...

    Though applying this tournament poker maxim to a cash game is bizzare, if this is actually the case, moving all-in is fairly clear. However, your exact goal in terms of "staying alive" matters.

    For example, if there is some great incentive to play the next hand specifically, folding the AA may be correct. However, if you strongly prefer to stay in the game for a few hours (and have no additional buy-in), being able to survive several rounds of paying the blinds is required, so you probably should go ahead and simply maximize your EV in this hand,1 which is the standard cash game practice.

    Was there some incentive to remain in this game for a specific amount of time (without buying-in again)?

    ScottyZ

    1It's certainly a valid question how exactly to go about doing this.
  • I would just push,, it looks likes desperation anyways I'd still expect to get called in 1 or 2 places. Alternatively raising to 15 or 20 would be ok depending how many players you expect to come along, and putting the last in on the flop. If you're down that low you should proably rebuy or just get up and leave though.
  • Short stacked in an NL cash game ( Uhh re-buy next time? ) your downside to allowing more players preflop is $30.

    You want to go to showdown and can potentially double or triple up as players who partially hit the flop call you for your pittance of a stack.
    just stay alive

    huh? It's a cash game. Either walk away from the table or rebuy when you get that shortstacked. You picked up aces and probably lost $200 in equity.
  • As has been pointed out, staying alive in a cashgame is irrelevant to your EV (although if you don't want to go home early, etc then I guess it's a factor).

    I think either a limp or a move-in is fine. The limp is *probably* slightly higher EV and higher variance. But, the difference is quite small. You got unlucky that nobody had a hand that could call.
  • it's amazing how someone will play 2/5 NL with 30 bucks left - it takes away all of your money-making opportunities

    NL is about implied odds, not effective odds - I'd push pf (you get called by someone with ak/aq/kk/qq/jj/tt/99 often enough to make it +ev over limping it)
  • Well the reason I wanted to "stay alive" was because that was the last of my bankroll for the night. I just wanted to maximize my winnings without getting outdrawn.
  • So...tell us you put the 12.00 to good use...
  • i think your play with AA depends on the table you are at... i think in a loose cash game, like that one going all in is the right play... except for maybe if you're in LP and there is 1player plus the blinds to act after you where everyone else has folded limping and hoping that some one hits and make money is maybe a better idea here. i'd say if you're at a tight table you should definately limp in and again hope someone hits... but i mean i don't think that you're ognna fold AA when you have 5x the BB left in your stack... so i would say depending on the table you are at limping or going all in is the right play.
  • I would suggest not worrying about being cute. If you have the best hand and only 6x the big blind you don't have any choice but all-in. And hey you won the pot ultimately that is the main goal.
  • why push out the weak hands? I would limp in and if someone raised then you go over the top and hopefully there is dead money in the pot and 1 caller. Gotta have a bit of courage.
  • I think you made the right move.

    A small bet may have let weaker cards in, wouldn't you be upset if your AA got smoked by a 9 high flush or a set of duces?

    Like someone else said, you only had 6x the big blind and if the players are really loose you may get the call you want.

    I think its fair to say that AK, AQ, AJ, and pocket pairs were not even in the hand as they all folded. If you got the call by any pocket pair, are you really that well off?

    I am not a big money player so I know what its like to get down to the bottom of your bankroll and have to claw your way back above board. I think you did the right thing.

    Just a thought.
  • I think one of two things

    A: Push all in, and let them try and "keep me honest" - though I would usually go with this only if I have my reputation as a "raise with anything" kinda guy, or a table full of nutcases who think "These cards MUST be live.. I'm calling"

    OR

    B: Smooth call, hope someone gets cute, and then hammer back the re-raise all in. I don't like this as much, because if nobody raises, you're stuck with what, maybe 4-5 players? Dangerous for aces. Like I said, I normally raise if I'm in a hand, so this play actually usually makes people MORE scared...

    Bottom line: Either play is respectable in my mind, $30 isn't a huge amount of cash at these levels, so you may have gotten a caller or two. And besides, you still make a 1/3rd of your stack, and that's not too shabby... I'm a big fan of take the money when you can.

    Mark
  • You see so many out there that well slow play it and go for the max amount of chips.But sure someone can get trips are something and that would really suck.
Sign In or Register to comment.