quick analysis
i think i know the answer... but humour me
5/10 shorthanded on PS
stats on villain over 60 hands are
VPIP 55%
pre flop raise 16%
and i had not seen him check raise all night
he;s also up about $40 since ive been there, if that means anything to you
PokerStars Game #2644665208:Â Hold'em Limit ($5/$10) - 2005/09/23 - 19:51:14 (ET)
Table 'Brigitta' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: The Kronzs ($235.50 in chips)
Seat 2: fouracesSW ($87 in chips)
Seat 3: First Knight ($259 in chips)
Seat 4: the_main ($195 in chips)
Seat 5: kajelir ($174 in chips)
Seat 6: Fenlander ($48 in chips)
fouracesSW: posts small blind $2
First Knight: posts big blind $5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to the_main [ :ac :10c]
the_main: raises $5 to $10
kajelir: folds
Fenlander: folds
The Kronzs: folds
fouracesSW: folds
First Knight: calls $5
*** FLOP *** [ :4c :3c :6h]
First Knight: checks
the_main: bets $5
First Knight: calls $5
*** TURN *** [:4c :3c :6h] [:ad]
First Knight: checks
Check behind??
5/10 shorthanded on PS
stats on villain over 60 hands are
VPIP 55%
pre flop raise 16%
and i had not seen him check raise all night
he;s also up about $40 since ive been there, if that means anything to you
PokerStars Game #2644665208:Â Hold'em Limit ($5/$10) - 2005/09/23 - 19:51:14 (ET)
Table 'Brigitta' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: The Kronzs ($235.50 in chips)
Seat 2: fouracesSW ($87 in chips)
Seat 3: First Knight ($259 in chips)
Seat 4: the_main ($195 in chips)
Seat 5: kajelir ($174 in chips)
Seat 6: Fenlander ($48 in chips)
fouracesSW: posts small blind $2
First Knight: posts big blind $5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to the_main [ :ac :10c]
the_main: raises $5 to $10
kajelir: folds
Fenlander: folds
The Kronzs: folds
fouracesSW: folds
First Knight: calls $5
*** FLOP *** [ :4c :3c :6h]
First Knight: checks
the_main: bets $5
First Knight: calls $5
*** TURN *** [:4c :3c :6h] [:ad]
First Knight: checks
Check behind??
Comments
BET!!!!
If you hate money, yes.
i did bet, and he folded
my only reason for posting this was that i figure i was so far ahead, i thought i could induce a blluff on the river
he has fairly aggressive, and i thought maybe a check could earn me an extra BB
for future reference, could you please post some reasoning behind your rationale... i think that wouuld lead to a far better disscussion.....
ok, here are my list of reasons for betting...
1. you likely have the best hand
2. your opponent is extremely loose, he will call with many worse hands
3. your opponent is agressive, and likely to bluff raise allowing you make more bets
4. you have a nut redraw on the odd chance you are behind
5. you dont mind taking the pot down now with a bet
6. ...did i mention, you likely have the best hand?
save inducing bluffs for situations where you have a hand you cant value bet.
You check. River comes, he bets, you raise, he calls. You win 2BB.
or
You bet, he calls. River comes, he checks, you bet, he calls. You win 2BB.
or
You check. River comes, he checks, you bet, he bluff raises, you reraise, he folds. You win 2 BB.
Of these 3 in LLHE, I choose 2nd scenario EVERY time. If he is going to suck out on you, MAKE HIM PAY.
seems like everyone agrees with my action - i guess im being results oriented b/c the guy folded
so let me ask this, if the river is a club.... the :qc for instance - do you still bet here, or check it?
i think hes joking...
Sure, I would check check here and show down the nuts in order to induce bluffs on future hands.
ScottyZ
Hmmm... Damn!!.... In the future, I'll read the entire thread, before I open my mouth!!
note to self... get sarcasm detector FIXED!!