Bad Play?
PokerStars Game #2311497752: Tournament #10968425, Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2005/08/11 - 00:02:43 (ET)
Table '10968425 7' Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: quietman (23498 in chips)
Seat 2: MOJOEX1 (16346 in chips)
Seat 3: Genguskon (32712 in chips)
Seat 5: IceBear55 (22961 in chips)
Seat 7: wesleyw (8848 in chips)
Seat 8: craiggers64 (5301 in chips)
Seat 9: Pokerstud (18437 in chips)
quietman: posts the ante 25
MOJOEX1: posts the ante 25
Genguskon: posts the ante 25
IceBear55: posts the ante 25
wesleyw: posts the ante 25
craiggers64: posts the ante 25
Pokerstud: posts the ante 25
quietman: posts small blind 200
MOJOEX1: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to wesleyw [Kh Jh]
Genguskon: folds
IceBear55: folds
wesleyw: raises 8423 to 8823 and is all-in
craiggers64: folds
Pokerstud: raises 8423 to 17246
quietman: folds
MOJOEX1: folds
*** FLOP *** [7c As Ts]
*** TURN *** [7c As Ts] [9s]
*** RIVER *** [7c As Ts 9s] [Js]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
wesleyw: shows [Kh Jh] (a pair of Jacks)
Pokerstud: shows [Ac Kd] (a pair of Aces)
Pokerstud collected 18421 from pot
Was this a bad hand to go all in with pre-flop? Should I have just called and see the flop first?
Table '10968425 7' Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: quietman (23498 in chips)
Seat 2: MOJOEX1 (16346 in chips)
Seat 3: Genguskon (32712 in chips)
Seat 5: IceBear55 (22961 in chips)
Seat 7: wesleyw (8848 in chips)
Seat 8: craiggers64 (5301 in chips)
Seat 9: Pokerstud (18437 in chips)
quietman: posts the ante 25
MOJOEX1: posts the ante 25
Genguskon: posts the ante 25
IceBear55: posts the ante 25
wesleyw: posts the ante 25
craiggers64: posts the ante 25
Pokerstud: posts the ante 25
quietman: posts small blind 200
MOJOEX1: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to wesleyw [Kh Jh]
Genguskon: folds
IceBear55: folds
wesleyw: raises 8423 to 8823 and is all-in
craiggers64: folds
Pokerstud: raises 8423 to 17246
quietman: folds
MOJOEX1: folds
*** FLOP *** [7c As Ts]
*** TURN *** [7c As Ts] [9s]
*** RIVER *** [7c As Ts 9s] [Js]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
wesleyw: shows [Kh Jh] (a pair of Jacks)
Pokerstud: shows [Ac Kd] (a pair of Aces)
Pokerstud collected 18421 from pot
Was this a bad hand to go all in with pre-flop? Should I have just called and see the flop first?
Comments
Moving all-in risks too much for too little reward. Basically, you have bet far more than you needed to in order to "get the job done". A standard-sized raise will usually be sufficient if your goal is to simply pick up the blinds & antes. Folding or limping in might be better options against chronic blind defenders.
The trouble with the exact hand KJ is that it's going to be in brutal shape nearly 100% of the time that you are called. Leave yourself an exit door in case an opponent picks up a hand that's worth playing behind you.
ScottyZ
So just because somebody is liable to come over the top of my standard raise to a total I cant call doesnt mean that it was a push or fold situation. Raising small then releasing in the face of pressure is a necessary skill.
I think that some of the confusion here may be that, while the Hero is the 2nd shortest stack at the table, he is NOT short-staked. He has about 22 times the big blind, which is certainly not push or fold territory.
ScottyZ
I never knew I'm "the Hero" in this forum now. Haha. I knew I made a bad play as soon as I press the "raise" button with the all-in. I guess to some extent I was a bit frustrated at a lack of good hands I have gotten (nothing good for nearly an hour), which kind of got me excited over this hand, as well as everytime I got a decent hand and play it to the end, I have gotten rivered. Thanks for all the advice given here. It was a stupid play as I let my emotion determined how I was going play this hand.
Sorry if it's bursting your bubble, but I was just using the forum (not really even this forum) hand analysis tradition of generically calling the poster the "Hero" and the opponent the "Villain".
ScottyZ
I agree, perhaps I was a little too blunt, there are more options then just push or fold, but I think the main part of my statement is true, before you make a move, you should know what you will do for each counter-move your opponent(s) could make. Taking this extra step in thinking will often make me re-evaluate my current decision. I guess a pro would call these things fold-equity, steal equity, etc.
OK. We are in middle position. We are in excellent shape. There are several players ahead of us, but it's costing less than 10% of our stack per lap of the button. We are not near the "panic button."
Oops. I don't like moving in. This appears to be a classic case of "you will only be called if you are a dog." Nothing wrong with raising something. YOu are in middle position with a good hand, but moving in is risking too much. I prefer raising to 2000 or limping - depending upon the texture of the game.
So... what would have happned if we had made it 2,000? He would have moved in and you could have folded.
I favour a standard raise as opposed to a call. But, calling isn't BAD.
6000? is it me or does that seem too much with blinds of 200/400. If he raises to 6000 and gets reraised for his last 2200 he'll be getting 6 over 5 to 1 on the call so i dont see how he could get away from it.
the 2,000 you mention later makes far more sense to me, where is 6000 coming from?