CPP Hat Contest
Want a Canadian Poker Player hat as worn on my head in the May issue of Canadian Poker Player Magazine?
The most "interesting" post before midnight June 15, 2004 to pokerforum.ca will be awarded a hat.
"Interesting" will be judged according to the following criterion:
(1) Respsonse -- how much did the forum like the post?
(2) Freshness -- did the post offer something new to discussions about poker? Please note that the most interesting post need not be a statement, a very interesting question is also a VERY valuable contribution.
In truth, it's a bit arbitary. I am hopeful that members will rise to the challenge of making this forumn interesting and informative. Good luck all.
The most "interesting" post before midnight June 15, 2004 to pokerforum.ca will be awarded a hat.
"Interesting" will be judged according to the following criterion:
(1) Respsonse -- how much did the forum like the post?
(2) Freshness -- did the post offer something new to discussions about poker? Please note that the most interesting post need not be a statement, a very interesting question is also a VERY valuable contribution.
In truth, it's a bit arbitary. I am hopeful that members will rise to the challenge of making this forumn interesting and informative. Good luck all.
Comments
If previously existing posts count, I don't know how we'll *ever* be able to compete with the likes of
Now that's fresh!
ScottyZ
We should start laying odds on who will win the hat, Vegas-style, for very large stakes. For some reason, betting a lot of money on who will win a hat appeals to me.
At this point, I'm picking ScottyZ at 3:2 as the favourite to win the hat.
Regards,
all_aces
yeah...
ScottyZ..........................3:2
all_aces........................2:1
Dan................................7:1
djw............................... 7:1
others...........................15:1
ConfusedONE...........3500:1 :shock:
LOL
i like the 'stuped' thread
Hehe, thanks!
That's quite a compliment, since my initial reaction was that your latest trip report series would be far in the lead if existing posts counted towards the competition.
Man, a 3:2 favorite vs. all comers?? That's a lot of pressure...
I've got to start thinking of something really good to post. It'll definitely have to involve all of the following:
triple draw lowball, Phil Helmuth with no shirt on, some monkeys, Vince Van Patten arm wrestling with X22, some of those European rectangle markers, something in bold with excessive smileys :shock: :? 8) :oops: :P :x :roll: :twisted: :evil: :?: :?: :?:, Diamond Tooth Gertie's, Dave Scharf winning the WSOP main event and looking scary giving the dealer a kiss on the cheek, online poker being rigged, people spilling beverages on themselves on purpose as a new Xtreme sport, the new plans for a poker room in Niagara Falls, Ontario, the merits of the limp-steal on the button minus 2 with 72o when you can literally put the big blind in a box, more monkeys even still, where on earth you can get one of these hard to find $100 bonus codes at PartyPoker, how I got chased down by a 2 outer in a low limit game by a slack jawed Ontario pro, an in depth analysis of why 8s 4d beats 6s 3d on a board of As Js 5c 9s 3s, Howard Lederer arm wrestling the "real" Professor, and last but not least: monkeys.
Monkeys somehow using laser levelers to gain an unfair advantage while playing triple draw lowball.
Hey, the stuff practically writes itself!
Me too. I think if you really (*really*) think about it, betting on this probably makes just as much sense as betting on things like the winner of the Superbowl.
ScottyZ
hmmmm looks familiar
thanks,
CO
The laser-leveling monkeys was hilarious, but I have to say that my favourite part was:
I picture someone walking into a casino and sitting down at a poker table, and placing a large clear 5-sided plexiglass box on the floor next to them. Nobody knows what it's for, and the person who brought it isn't saying.
About two hours later, he picks it up, walks around to the other side of the table and calmly puts it over the head and shoulders of an opponent, without a word. He then returns to his seat and continues to play.
That friggin' slayed me.
Regards,
all_aces
You guys are too kind....
all_aces
Hehehe!
I'm really glad somebody caught this one. I'm all about enjoying misuses of the word "literally". 8)
ScottyZ
So, I guess I went off on a bit of a tangent there, about the 5-sided large plexiglass box and all...
No harm done, except to my perceived level of sanity.
Regards,
all_aces
ROTFLMAO
No, no. The funniest thing is that, at the time, I meant it *exactly* the way you interpreted it. I had in mind (literally) putting the *player* who was the in the big blind seat in the box!
Although, I was only picturing some sort of cardboard box. 8)
I guess we're both crazy.
ScottyZ
hmmm, and here I thought this entailed an obese sight-impaired individual?
Now THAT is a literal translation. It took me a while to get it, but I got it. I'm a bit slow.
I think you trumped us both, SirBry.
Regards,
all_aces
LOL nicely done!
Did I win?
Keith
Congrats Keith!!
Keith