question
how should i have played this better
PokerStars Game #432379604: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2004/05/12 - 19:23:40 (ET)
Table 'Lamberta' Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: beaux dog ($6.75 in chips)
Seat 2: davsh ($10.30 in chips)
Seat 3: divides_by_0 ($11.05 in chips)
Seat 4: Jon&April ($28.25 in chips)
Seat 5: Canuck77 ($11.70 in chips)
Seat 6: The_Gamblar ($9.50 in chips)
Seat 7: HappyTree ($12.25 in chips)
Seat 8: Captain75o ($18.55 in chips)
fools crow will be allowed to play after the button
beaux dog: posts small blind $0.10
davsh: posts big blind $0.25
HappyTree: posts small & big blinds $0.35
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to The_Gamblar [Jd Js]
divides_by_0: folds
Jon&April: calls $0.25
Canuck77: folds
The_Gamblar: raises $1.25 to $1.50
divides_by_0 leaves the table
HappyTree: folds
Captain75o: folds
beaux dog: folds
davsh: calls $1.25
Jon&April: folds
*** FLOP *** [Ks 9d 6c]
davsh: checks
The_Gamblar: bets $2
davsh: calls $2
*** TURN *** [Ks 9d 6c] [8h]
davsh: checks
The_Gamblar: checks
*** RIVER *** [Ks 9d 6c 8h] [4c]
davsh: bets $2
The_Gamblar: folds
davsh collected $7.35 from pot
PokerStars Game #432379604: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2004/05/12 - 19:23:40 (ET)
Table 'Lamberta' Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: beaux dog ($6.75 in chips)
Seat 2: davsh ($10.30 in chips)
Seat 3: divides_by_0 ($11.05 in chips)
Seat 4: Jon&April ($28.25 in chips)
Seat 5: Canuck77 ($11.70 in chips)
Seat 6: The_Gamblar ($9.50 in chips)
Seat 7: HappyTree ($12.25 in chips)
Seat 8: Captain75o ($18.55 in chips)
fools crow will be allowed to play after the button
beaux dog: posts small blind $0.10
davsh: posts big blind $0.25
HappyTree: posts small & big blinds $0.35
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to The_Gamblar [Jd Js]
divides_by_0: folds
Jon&April: calls $0.25
Canuck77: folds
The_Gamblar: raises $1.25 to $1.50
divides_by_0 leaves the table
HappyTree: folds
Captain75o: folds
beaux dog: folds
davsh: calls $1.25
Jon&April: folds
*** FLOP *** [Ks 9d 6c]
davsh: checks
The_Gamblar: bets $2
davsh: calls $2
*** TURN *** [Ks 9d 6c] [8h]
davsh: checks
The_Gamblar: checks
*** RIVER *** [Ks 9d 6c 8h] [4c]
davsh: bets $2
The_Gamblar: folds
davsh collected $7.35 from pot
Comments
why did u fold? :?: :? :shock: :unsure:
i think i would've call :shock:
The question is:
Hmm.... I think I probably play the hand the very same as you do.
J-J almost certainly the best hand pre-flop. When the limper calls your flop bet you have to give him credit for something. Given that he limped in I will tend to put him on a hand with which he wants to see the flop cheap. In a micro-limit game like this I am guessing random big cards, suited connectors, or small pair. When he calls the flop bet I am putting him on a king or 8-7. I'm done with the hand. I doubt he is bluffing the river.
That is, unless I have limper pegged as a bluffer in which case I check the turn intending to induce a bluff and call the river.
When you're last to act on the river facing a bet (without the intention of raising), it simply boils down to assessing the probability that you are going to win the hand.
To call here, your probability of winning needs to be greater than
$2 / $7.35 = 0.27
So if you decide that there is more than a 27% chance that you have the better hand, you can call here.
To estimate this probability, you need to know how often this player tends to bet hands worse than JJ in the kind of situation you are in. What range of hands will he call (and not re-raise) a large raise with pre-flop? How often will he bet after the opponent shows weakness? What is this player's typical reason for betting the river? How does he value his hands in general? Might he think a pair below JJ is actually good? Does the river card help him? Was he slowplaying a monster?
If this player was an *absolute unknown*, I would have called. In low-limit no-limit, your opponent could have just about anything here.
ScottyZ
that was my reasoning for not calling on the river..