worst. poker. book. ever.

which is the worst poker book you ever read?...mine would have to be Ken Warren teaches poker, and I also did not find TJ's book very helpful, Brunson's book although dated, I found to be very helpful in my game

Comments

  • 'Play Poker like the Pros', by Phil Helllmuth!!!
  • 'Play Poker like the Pros', by Phil Helllmuth!!!

    That was the worst Holdem book, but the other games are pretty good.. O8 being the more interesting..

    I think my least favourite book was the TJ/McEvoy NL tournament book. I read it in 15 minutes and got nothing out of it. It was like 40 bucks or something too.. real expensive.
  • yup, he had some okay stories but I didnt buy the book for stories and I didn't buy the book so that I would become a igneious (sp?) rock
  • i can't remember the name of it, but there's this coil-bound book i've seen around...some canadian guy who seems to think he knows what he's talking about...

    i can't believe what makes it to the shelves these days ;-)
  • BBC Z wrote:
    'Play Poker like the Pros', by Phil Helllmuth!!!

    That was the worst Holdem book, but the other games are pretty good.. O8 being the more interesting..


    I just bought the book by Phil Hellmuth, why is it the worst?
  • Not exactly a book. But the How to play Online poker by Helmuth is the biggest joke ever! Granted I downloaded it and didnt buy the DVD, so I can only complain about the time wasted. He spent a good 15 or 20 minutes explaining what "LOL" and "LMFAOROFL" means, and it looked like he is was just making it up as he went a long. It was truly the most pointless poker teaching aid EVER!
  • I don't really care for the poker strategy books I have read by Phil Hellmuth, Gary Carson, and Ken Warren.

    A non-strategy poker book that I didn't find all that great was "Read 'em and Weep: A Bedside Poker Companion". This collection of poker short stories and excerpts didn't really grab my interest. The organization of the collection was basically random (alphabetical by author?), and few of the individual stories/excerpts were very memorable.

    ScottyZ
  • Poker for Dummies.

    It should have been entitled, "What beats what. That's all we know."
  • I must agree with the masses, Phil Hellmuth's 'Playing Poker like the Pro's' book is the worst I have read.....I must admit tho, when I first began playing poker, oh so many days ago....a good friend (see Wolffhound, someone does like you....not man flirtring!!!!) lent me the Hellmuth book and I read it. It made sense, the stories were kind of funny, for a beginner the starting hands he suggests helped me get my feet wet and I must admit NOT lose very much money. That said I had never seen Hellmuth, recently I had the sorrow of actually watching this guy...well to me he looks more like a she-male, playing poker. I have never seen someone whine soooooo much, so although I believe it not a bad intro to poker for a beginner, the fact that he is so irritating makes it a bad book IMHO!
    You can't beat Sklansky and Jones, well....I'm sure they lose their share of hands...but their books are damn good!
  • Big E wrote:
    That said I had never seen Hellmuth, recently I had the sorrow of actually watching this guy...well to me he looks more like a she-male, playing poker. I have never seen someone whine soooooo much,

    And he's only going to be even harder to live with now that he won the heads-up championship.  I so wanted
    Antonio or Jesus to knock him off his pedestal.
  • wow, hellmuth is a great player. his "poker persona" is so great too. you hate him so much you hate being beat by him more.

    i htink it's great. and i also think his play is great too.

    thanks,
    johnny
  • oh, he's a great player for sure Johnny, just a very weird looking dude?
  • Hellmuth's book sucks. I returned it and got a refund.
  • I have to agree that the worst poker book ever is Hellmuth's "Play Poker Like the Pro's". I even once heard someone that had said they read this book and haven't had a losing session yet...man does he have some tough times ahead.
  • I found parts of Hellmuth's book interesting. I think that if you can get beyond the text at face value, there were some interesting things there. It was, as far as I know, the first book to name names.

    Some sketchy advice to be sure, but I didn't hate it as much as most.
  • I'm reading Hellmuth's book, it doesn't seem half-bad... is the advice in it wrong?
  • killer poker online by john vorhaus
    has a whole lot of suck attached to it

    im also not a big fan of mcevoy's limit book

  • I'm reading Hellmuth's book, it doesn't seem half-bad... is the advice in it wrong?

    I don't think the advice is wrong or even bad, honestly when I started playing I stuck to Hellmuth's top 10 hands, it allowed me to start to learn the game and not lose a lot of money. I think it was helpfull from that stand point, I thought the little chapter on tourney play was helpfull as well. That said, I don't think it really does more then gloss over the game, it is very superficial. Sklansky and Jones are much more in depth and informative. I think if you really want to improve your low-limit ring game you really should study Jones and then Sklansky.
  • yubyub1978 wrote:
    killer poker online by john vorhaus
    has a whole lot of suck attached to it


    Ain't that the truth. I don't even consider this a poker book. I gave it to my dog to play with.
  • if you really want to improve your low-limit ring game you really should study Jones and then Sklansky.

    THis is good advice.

    And, you are right, Hellmuth's advice will keep you from losing a lot of money. I doubt, however, you will make much if any playing his top ten under all circumstances which is, as I recall, what he suggests.

  • I'm reading Hellmuth's book, it doesn't seem half-bad... is the advice in it wrong?

    For holdem: He tells you to start out by playing tight and being aggressive - nothing at all wrong with that. His hand selection for doing so might get new players in a bit of trouble (his list is good for tight games, but most new players get their start in loose games where middle pocket pairs aren't nearly so strong), but overall his advice is on the right track. People tend to focus on the top ten hands, without taking into account the fact that those are for new players to not get killed - his intermediate and advanced play chapters open up the hand selection quite a bit, and advocate a more read-focused selective-aggressive game, not unlike most other pro books.

    For other games: he seems to cover the basics pretty well, I don't remember seeing anything particularly outrageous, but I'm a noob at them myself so can't really comment beyond that.

    Pretty much the only really valid criticism of his book, IMHO, is the name - it's more of a beginner-to-intermediate guide than something that's going to help you crush the 50/100 tables.
  • I doubt, however, you will make much if any playing his top ten under all circumstances which is, as I recall, what he suggests.

    you are so right Dave, I think it is perhaps a good starting point for new players to the game, it certainly helped me when I started...but that is about it. There is so much more to the game and I think Jones and Sklansky do a terrific job of post flop play...and dammit all, one day I will actually understand it and be a good player lol!!!
  • I just started to read Jones and I think it's a great book.  I love the way he writes ...... he makes it so easy to understand.  I read SS a while ago and although there is amazing information there, it was a bit dense and dry to read.  I found myself having to read paragraphs over and over before I could understand them ....... and even then some passages left me scratching my head. I'm still glad I read it though and will definitely have to re-visit it later with a new perspective.

    But this thread was supposed to be about the worst poker book ...... in that case I'd also have to vote for Vorhaus.  There's also another one, geared towards female players in a man's world ..... called "Playing Poker with the Big Boys" or something equally as stupid.  Totally lame ....... chapters devoted to how to play baby games and what to serve for snacks.  If I didn't get it as a gift I would have quickly asked for my money back.  Girls, stay away from this one.
Sign In or Register to comment.