Likely EV vs. actual EV of calling on a flush or straight draw
I know everyone has run into the situation where they’ve hit a flush or open ended straight draw on the flop. Deciding whether to call on the flop is usually pretty easy as long as you are not facing an over bet since the implied EV should be positive even against a full pot bet. The situation I find most difficult is what to do on the turn when you miss? I understand the theory behind EV which basically says you would multiply 2 times your number of outs to determine your % chance to hit and then fold if it is showing negative EV. However, I’ve always wondered if this is how to properly assess the situation. In reality, based on this theory, you basically should always be folding unless you are facing a 1/3 pot bet which is still a borderline fold/call. What I wonder about is the EV which is only based on what is currently in the pot. This is where I wonder if the theory is broken. What if I can say with confidence that I could bet another half pot if I hit my flush or straight (let’s assume both of these are the nuts) and the villain will call? I feel like, a lot of people would call in this situation at microstakes and maybe even low stakes and it’s not an unrealistic expectation. Wouldn’t this mean that the true EV of hitting you flush or straight is actually a lot higher than theory dictates? If this is the case, does it not imply that in these situations with fishy type players, you should in fact call a bet (maybe even as high as full pot) on the turn? Maybe I’m crazy but just wondering if anyone else has had this thinking because it just seems like a waste to constantly be folding draws on the turn vs. 50-75% pot bets. Let me know your thoughts?
Comments