TT on a 987 flop A turn, river shove on a blank

ReefAquariumReefAquarium
in Analyze My Hand
In every session I play I make at least 20 bad errors.


2/5 (2800 deep)

1 Limper
TT in MP I make it 25,

Lag in MP flats,

Flop 987r

I bet 50

Lag Calls

Turn A

I make it 125

Lag flats

River 3

I make it 75

Lag shoves for 415 more.

Comments

  • trigstrigs
    [FONT=&quot]check and call river maybe. i would probably check and fold, but i am a nit lol. lag could have floated flop and hit his A on the turn. or he could be slowplaying a straight. i do not think he has a set as just calling flop and turn do not make sense. he could also have had A rag and just called the flop with one pair and turned two pair. unless he is pushing with complete air, i think he has you beat here.
    [/FONT]
  • pkrfce9pkrfce9
    Explain the purpose of your bet on the river.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • Wetts1012Wetts1012
    pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Explain the purpose of your bet on the river.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU

    Yea, this.

    Villain has repped relative strength and wasn't really interested in your turn bet.


    You have 2 of his potential range in your hand so it's unlikely to be 9/10 8/10, etc.

    I assume river bet is a bluff? You're not getting too many value calls here and a paired 6 is certainly folding.
  • ReefAquariumReefAquarium
    pkrfce9 wrote: »
    Explain the purpose of your bet on the river.

    I beat him into the pot.

    I fast roll, "One Pair" I say.
  • pkrfce9pkrfce9
    then it 'worked'

    congrats
  • ReefAquariumReefAquarium
    I show TT

    Villain doesn't show.
  • pkrfce9pkrfce9
    and the error here is?
  • ReefAquariumReefAquarium
    I should not have snap called.

    I should have at least thought about it.
  • Wetts1012Wetts1012
    ReefAquarium wrote: »
    I should not have snap called.

    I should have at least thought about it.

    Had you thought about it, you likely would have folded. You ran into one of the few bluffs in his range.
  • pkrfce9pkrfce9
    If you bet weak to entice a shove from a lag you should fist pump snap call. No need to think about it as you already did that before the bet. Right?

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • pkrfce9pkrfce9
    But I think the error was in your plan. You got lucky IMO.

    I did see this play executed to perfection by the best player I have ever sat at the table with. He didn't fist pump or high five the table. He just calmly called and tabled the nuts. It was a beautiful thing.

    tapatalk puts this here to annoy YOU
  • BlondeFishBlondeFish
    ReefAquarium wrote: »
    I should not have snap called.
    I should have at least thought about it.
    +1. I used to make the blunder of snap calling an all-in without the nuts. I see a lot of players insta-call an all-in, then get mad at themselves for not even thinking about it first.
    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Is Tapatalk worth using for this forum and 2+2? I've been using the Facebook app so far to give real-time poker updates.
  • piggypie123piggypie123
    I just down loaded the tapatalk app, and I like it. Try it out, you may like it too.
  • UBetIFoldUBetIFold
    Aside from originally setting up this account, I have only ever viewed this forum through tapatalk. I love it, although I don't think 2+2 is on tapatalk, at least last I checked.
  • ReefAquariumReefAquarium
    Epilog,

    Very next hand villain buys in for $400 and donks it off and then leaves the table.
Sign In or Register to comment.
HomeDiscussionsToggle Dark Mode