Not at all. I wish I was when I saw it, then I could have easily overlooked the flawed logic in the storyline. It was a Kryptonian-powered Michael Bay's Transformer movie in tights.
Not at all. I wish I was when I saw it, then I could have easily overlooked the flawed logic in the storyline. It was a Kryptonian-powered Michael Bay's Transformer movie in tights.
Michael Bay movies aren't meant to be good and have solid plot & story lines without flaws in logic and whatnot, he makes movies which are visual orgasms which I find very entertaining as long as I go in without the expectation of a good story/acting/plot/makes any sense at all.
Comments
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0193524/
Transformers 3
Are you high?!?
Sand Sharks Trailer - YouTube
/end thread
Not at all. I wish I was when I saw it, then I could have easily overlooked the flawed logic in the storyline. It was a Kryptonian-powered Michael Bay's Transformer movie in tights.
My Star Wars universe does NOT include Bea Arthur.
You're getting old...some people just never like remakes I guess:
Land Shark | Free Video Clips | SPIKE
Discuss
no.
true
+1 - Although it's the only Josh Hartnett movie I can watch.
I Now Pronounce you Chuck and Larry.
/thread
Sin City - albeit a supporting / limited role, great flick
Mark
I shit you not . . . this movie is playing on TV starting in an hour on Bravo or showcase or some crap.
Apparently this movie had a budget of $1M. From what I've seen so far, it's hard to believe they spent that much.
Viewers get in the swim to tweet about 'Sharknado' | CP24.com
Wow, how can 1.37 million have watched this? I guess lots would say a train wreck would be interesting to watch as well.
and we see you lurking AJ.