Was This The Right Play?

Scenario:

I’m in the second round of a tournament -

I’m dealt Qs, 5s in the pocket

Everyone else folds, except for the chipleader at our table. He and I both bet the big blind to see the flop. I notice the chipleader is getting more aggressive and vocal in the past few minutes (chiplead can do that to a guy!)

Flop: Qd , 4h, 2c

At this point, I’ve got QQ – considering blinds 10K/20K and are going up and I'm small stack (about 190K) – I decide to go all in to be aggressive and push him off whatever he has - I have about half his stack.

– and the chipleader calls me.

Turn: 7h

River: 5c

On the Showdown, I have two pair – Q,Q and 5,5

Chipleader shows a low Straight A, 2, 3, 4, 5 – he caught the Straight on the River.

Here's what I think:

An Analysis of Outs:

His Outs:

- Pick up an Ace = 3 Outs
- Pick up a Five = 3 Outs less the one I have = 2 Outs
Total Outs = 5 therefore he has 20.3% chance of winning the hand after the flop with two cards to come.

My Outs:

- Pick up another Queen = 2 Outs
- Pick up another Five = 3 Outs
- Pick up another Two = 3 Outs
- Pick up another Four = 3 Outs

Total Outs = 11 therefore I have a 41.7% of winning the hand after the flop with two cards to come.

Therefore, even with the admittedly poor Q,5 in the pocket - I made the right play... any comments all? am I correct?

** all percentages from http://www.freepokerstrategy.bravehost.com/oddschance.html

note: chipleader has A, 3

Comments

  • are you in the blind?? small or big??
    if you werent in a blind calling with Q5 is a huge mistake

    you only had two outs to improve your hand(at this point you hand the best hand)
    two queens
    the 2 and 4 help his hand as much as yours
    and you both cant share the same outs i.e. the 5

    the five only helps his hand giving him the straight( im assuming he had A3 as you never stated what he had)
    leaving your opponent with 5 outs 3 Aces and 2 fives
  • How big was his stack as chip leader, considering your 'small stack' was 190k I'm assuming he had alot of chips?
  • Thanks for the feedback:

    - Not sure, but I think I was small blind and Chipleader was big blind.
    - Chipleader had about 400K in chips

    you guys are correct in that we can't both have the same out (oops!).. so, the updated outs are as follows:

    An Analysis of Outs:

    His Outs:

    - Pick up an Ace = 3 Outs [pair of aces]
    - Pick up a Five = 3 Outs less the one I have = 2 Outs [straight]
    Total Outs = 5 therefore he has 20.3% chance of winning the hand after the flop with two cards to come.

    My Outs:

    - Pick up another Queen = 2 Outs [trip queens]
    - Pick up another Two = 3 Outs [two pair Q,2]
    - Pick up another Four = 3 Outs [two pair Q,4]

    Total Outs = 8 therefore I have a 31.5% of winning the hand after the flop with two cards to come.

    I still seem to have a ~11% edge on the guy - am I right or wrong?

    Postscript:

    I ran the hands on a Hold'em Hand Calculator - the results showing probability of winning the hand were as follows (winner in bold):

    Preflop:
    Me-42% Chipleader-58%
    Flop:
    Me-77% Chipleader-23% - I went ALL IN at this point
    Turn:
    Me-86% Chipleader-14%
    River:
    Me-0% Chipleader-100%

    As you can see - I had a 77% probability of winning post flop - hence I still believe I made the right decision - and I just got rivered - what do you folks think?
  • If youre shortstacked, you shouldnt be limping with this hand.

    If you were actually small blind and him big blind, again you shouldnt have limped. Raise him or fold. After the flop, you were out of position - not a fun place to be when youre shortstacked facing the chip leader.
    As for your move, it was far too big a bet at this pot - you couldve gotten the info you needed with a pot sized bet. I just don't like putting all my chips on the line when I have ZERO info on the player I'm up against. Because you didn't raise preflop, you have no idea what BB is holding.
  • 1. I agree that limping in with this hand is not ideal, however the prospect of being blinded out the longer I waited was an issue. Note that even with QQ in the pocket, I still would have lost the hand - and I would not have been "limping in"

    2. Raising with a Q/5 preflop against a chip leader would have given me no new information - he was calling any raise at this point to see the flop - besides, it's tough to raise preflop on a Q/5 in the pocket.

    3. Well, it turns out he had an A, 3 - my gambit was to try to push him off his straight draw(or whatever he had) with an all in bet (recall I had 77% advantage off the flop).

    4. I do agree that the way to win this hand was to have folded pre-flop, and lived to fight another day.

    Thanks for your comments.
  • 1. you had 10xBB and were about to see a free orbit, i dont think this a time to panic yet... especially if youre at a full table

    2. raising always gives you more info than limping - the fact that you showed preflop strength may have got him to lay down on the flop - He couldve thought you were bluffing and his ace high was good (also, for the record, i've raised with far worse hands than Q5 ;) )

    3. yes you were no doubt the favourite in that situation, but if you ignore the results, i just think its a reckless play - risking your entire tourny with no info on the opponent
  • ... at what percent favourite do you have to be???

    Before it is not reckless???
  • the analysis being made now is with a signifcantly greater amount of info that was available at that time

    he didnt know how far he was ahead when he made the play, so you cant judge his actions with that information.
  • maybe his a3 was suited so he called. No info on that.
  • Thanks for all the excellent viewpoints, guys...

    If memory serves, the A, 3 was offsuit - another interesting tidbit was the fact that Chipleader went on to win the tournament - by trip aces on the river against a flush draw his opponent had off the flop - Chipleader was very lucky that night...
  • you are ahead!

    The reckless play here was by the chip leader, who called our hero's bet.

    It worked out for him sure, but that's poker.
  • whether or not the chip leaders play was reckless has no bearing on the appropriateness of the hero's move
  • ... we'll agree to disagree?
Sign In or Register to comment.