Options
math halp
Given x = 1 and y = 1, then:
x = y
Multiplying each side by x,
we get
x2 = xy
Subtracting y2 from each side, we get:
x2 - y2 = xy - y2
Factoring each side,
we get:
(x + y) (x - y) = y (x - y)
Dividing by the common term
(x - y), we get:
x + y = y
Substituting the given values,
we get:
1 + 1 = 1
Therefore:
2 = 1.
WAT
where the hell is the mistake???
x = y
Multiplying each side by x,
we get
x2 = xy
Subtracting y2 from each side, we get:
x2 - y2 = xy - y2
Factoring each side,
we get:
(x + y) (x - y) = y (x - y)
Dividing by the common term
(x - y), we get:
x + y = y
Substituting the given values,
we get:
1 + 1 = 1
Therefore:
2 = 1.
WAT
where the hell is the mistake???
Comments
Been done.
Edit: Can't find the thread...have at it.
to elaborate a bit your premise is that x = y then you perform an operation that is invalid if x = y
this is for an aptitude test for a job, not clipping and pasting anything.. but thanx for that input. its really appreciated and relevant!
So the forum is applying for a job? What's it going to do? What's the pay like?
it's spelled 'help'.
you're welcome.
the forum isn't applying for anything, im just looking for help for something im obviously missing.
troll somewhere else.
"halp" is an internet meme way of asking for help.
no thank you to your welcome offer.
Edit: which is possible to tilt you into angerful ragalistic sarcasmic state of unreason. Its possible they want to see if they confuse you will you get mad and press the nuclear meltdown button.
pretty sure rich already gave you the answer.
if x=1 and y=1 then (x-y)=0 and you can't divide by 0
Nah, I like it under this bridge
EDIT: Congrats on trying to get a job.
http://www.pokerforum.ca/f12/algebra-trick-25436/
sigh.
im a retard.
tyty.
the trick is you defined x to equal y in the premise. Thus x-y will always equal zero
no x can equal y , the value is the same, whether its 1 or 0
yes, you can do the same for x =/= y implies that x+y =/= y unless x=0 and y=/=x
Depends on how you look at it.
I prefer to say that 'y cannot equal x'
Letterism itt . . .