Options

Yoda video 2

K heres another fun video, i picked up some headphones with a mic so the sound is better (almost too good). the video doesn't look too clear on my screen but might be the resolution, Ill have to work that out. But the stack size aren't as relevant for this and i think you can see everything else good enough. ***if you can't do full screen then i gave the wrong link****

Its just a small concept I see in all the fields I play in. There's some more considerations when doing this but i still think its a building block many miss.

I'm not so good on a mic but i think i got the point across....

and for god sakes make your own!


The gentler way - retar - blip.tv

Comments

  • that was great, i enjoyed that.

    Any plans to go supernova?
  • AIPF wrote: »
    that was great, i enjoyed that.

    Any plans to go supernova?
    yes but be warned i also have plans to make the nhl!
  • darbday wrote: »
    yes but be warned i also have plans to make the nhl!

    U have agent?

    U need agent?

    Nice vid, well explained. Will prob try one of these.
  • One question I have with the video tho is

    are you saying when you have middle pair J's-9's maybe 8's to get it all in if an over card comes and the opponent has position on you? Also, what software was that?

    thanks.
  • AIPF wrote: »
    One question I have with the video tho is

    are you saying when you have middle pair J's-9's maybe 8's to get it all in if an over card comes and the opponent has position on you? Also, what software was that?

    thanks.
    the software on the left is universal replayer (i think), the one on the right is poker stove they are both free....

    as for the situation, i can't tell you when to call or fold, theres too many possibilities but if decide not fold then this will help you win more often in these spots....
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    U have agent?

    U need agent?

    i need skates....and a stick....:(
    Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Will prob try one of these.

    yyyyeeesssss!^-^
  • darbday wrote: »
    i need skates....and a stick....:(



    ummm, maybe skill as well??



































    lol, kidding ok darb, I'm sure you're a very skillful hockey player...:)
  • Was blurry for me.

    1st hand w JJ, I think you gave him too wide a range (all pocket pairs?) for 3 betting (but I was not at the table). Once the flop comes down, you should have added the board into Poker Stove.

    On that flop, you are 3:2 dog without removing cards from his range.
    Once you narrow his range on the flop (3 min 4 sec). You are 9:1 dog.
  • Darb showed up in a Drag The Bar video that I am watching ($10 2R1A), but he's been sitting out for 4 blind levels.

    Is that your secret? :D
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    Was blurry for me.

    ya i gotta figure out the settings and upload so its not a blurry format.
    Hobbes wrote: »
    1st hand w JJ, I think you gave him too wide a range (all pocket pairs?) for 3 betting (but I was not at the table). Once the flop comes down, you should have added the board into Poker Stove.

    i didn't add all pairs for the first hand (not for any) but mid pairs for sure and some times it gets wider. i think people make the mistake of putting people on too tight a range here.....but its all read dependent.....
    Hobbes wrote: »
    On that flop, you are 3:2 dog without removing cards from his range.

    sure, and with pot odds we could call depending on how short we are, but there is a little more play to be had here.........

    Hobbes wrote: »
    Once you narrow his range on the flop (3 min 4 sec). You are 9:1 dog.

    ...and this will re iterate the point but, when we are in a spot like this we don't want to narrow his range by allowing him to fold his weaker hands.....

    sometimes we want to consider slowplaying to keep it closer to the 3:2 range.....

    board texture becomes important but the basic concept is 'i'f we are going to continue with hand we want to be a 3:2 dog not a 9:1
  • compuease wrote: »

    lol, kidding ok darb, I'm sure you're a very skillful hockey player...:)
    .........nope ;)
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    Darb showed up in a Drag The Bar video that I am watching ($10 2R1A), but he's been sitting out for 4 blind levels.

    Is that your secret? :D
    wow lol, that seems so unlikely id do that.....im prob smoking in the garage lol.....ill prob show up again in time to go out with aces! actually i did fall asleep playin once only to wake up to an all in that i lost first hand awake...
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    U have agent?

    U need agent?

    Nice vid, well explained. Will prob try one of these.



    Ya dam it! Do one just for us peeps!:)
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Will prob try one of these.

    subject = value-bluffing

    :confused:
  • Bet/call the AQ otf. Check/shove as played. You're not just worried about folding out worse hands but also you wanna get value while you can still rep a wide-ish range of draws and stuff and so a 9 or T or club doesn't come on the turn and make him shutdown with his worse 1 pairs.

    Your range for calling pre is too tight and range for 3-betting is too loose in most cases (unless you have reads that he 3-bets 77/88/QJo. Can't see stacks very well to know if calling JJ pre is best or not in the first hand, but yea c/c'ing Kxx boards is best.
  • Vekked wrote: »
    Bet/call the AQ otf. Check/shove as played. You're not just worried about folding out worse hands but also you wanna get value while you can still rep a wide-ish range of draws and stuff and so a 9 or T or club doesn't come on the turn and make him shutdown with his worse 1 pairs.
    yes and i do this vs any decent player. here with 10bbs this guy called pre rather than jamming, which no matter what hand he has is just silly. So I couldn't care less, im not folding obv, and the read I had was that hes weak and passive...so more often than not I will get it in on the flop, i really felt like he would fold with aggression and get it in if i checked, but a check jam would be more standard too for sure....

    Vekked wrote: »
    Your range for calling pre is too tight.
    not sure if your refering to the last hand with the villain calling with 10bbs left. my range here is that he has some kind of decent hand, and may be setting minning all pairs.....but it doesn't really matter cause were getting it in.....or was it a different calling range you mean?
    Vekked wrote: »
    and range for 3-betting is too loose in most cases (unless you have reads that he 3-bets 77/88/QJo.
    no the range is really aq+,tt+, but i also add 99 because i don't want the range to be to tight. i also add kqs and ajs because the general field is a little loose and bad (well thats not soo bad though).

    qjo was just an example to show how we can sometimes blow the villain off the good parts of his range.... if we use an accurate range I always add a little bluff to the numbers. Anyways its not really in his range no....


    Vekked wrote: »
    B Can't see stacks very well to know if calling JJ pre is best or not in the first hand, but yea c/c'ing Kxx boards is best.
    ya its kinda good you can't see the stacks lol, i didn't consider them when i picked the hand, ive been looking for a hand like this to use as an example but my problem was finding a hand with the correct stack sizes.


    your turn for a vid ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.