US PPA Legislation

Anyone into the details on this, Ive only read wats on 2p2.

I mean its American legislation but it would have significant Canadian impact if passed.

Not to mention we're lemmings and the Can govt would likely follow suit relatively quickly.
«1

Comments

  • my lord what a mess, starts with marc emery, ends with www3 i swear to god.
  • since lottery winnings aren't taxable in Canada, I suggest Canada would not be quick to follow.
  • asxn557 wrote: »
    since lottery winnings aren't taxable in Canada, I suggest Canada would not be quick to follow.


    with the conservatives, stuff like that and internet pirating laws could change in the blink of an eye, it takes time of course but once they set it in motion, its impossible even for competent voters to stop it.
  • darbday wrote: »
    with the conservatives, stuff like that and internet pirating laws could change in the blink of an eye, it takes time of course but once they set it in motion, its impossible for competent voters to stop it.

    So we have to borrow the US populous of incompetent voters?
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    So we have to borrow the US populous of incompetent voters?

    im lost in the satire....um the US is a dictatorship?

    or

    as weed laws get harsher and harsher it becomes increasingly obvious that US polititcians are shaping our legal system and therefore government system (which is def shaped by the people (voters) left outside of the jails and their ability to express 'free speech' when such things are illegal to do so frowned upon to talk about).


    This also pertains to censorship of the internet which will be next.....and leads us to wiki leaks...perhaps our savior......
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    So we have to borrow the US populous of incompetent voters?


    ahh no...its impossible for voters to stop them, even competent ones..... which we are not.
  • The US is absolutely out of control....
  • darbday wrote: »
    The US is absolutely out of control....

    Does anyone have coles notes on this?

    My understanding is:

    A) Legislation gets passed.
    B) Effective Feb 11 any site that wants in is "locked out" for 15 months.
    C) Stars and FTP want in, so they will lock out US players for 15 months.
    D) During this time regulation will be developed.
    E) After 15 months it is opened back up and regulated.

    idk I havent read too much on it.
  • 9. Transitional period: For 15 months, no site will be licensed and all iPoker sites must cease operations in the US. Current sites have a 30-day (possibly 60-day in latest draft) grace period to stop. All US player account funds will be returned within 30 days after that. Any site that violates this will never be able to get a US license nor sell their assets to a US licensed site. At the end of the 15 months, there will be a simultaneous launch of all initially licensed sites, creating a new competitive market to the benefit of players (competitive rakes, player incentives, etc.) and giving a level playing field for all the initially licensed sites.
  • it must be easy to play in the us and have it show up from somewhere else no?
  • What's This? and where is the story?
  • darbday wrote: »
    it must be easy to play in the us and have it show up from somewhere else no?

    Even if you could, in order to withdraw from any major sites it must be a verified account. That means proof of citizenship (license, etc) and proof that you reside there (phone bill, etc).
  • I read the post jdAA88 Link.
    Looks like the U.S wants the TAX MONEY of course. Also looks like they want companies already running casinos to own these sites.

    FTP and Stars in order to operate legally would have to be owned by a person or group who currently holds a licence to operate a Casino or racetrack in the U.S.
    If this happens, on Line sites will withhold tax from Canadian players just like if you were playing in a casino down there.
    Or from any other country.
  • HVEEPOKER wrote: »
    I read the post jdAA88 Link.
    Looks like the U.S wants the TAX MONEY of course. Also looks like they want companies already running casinos to own these sites.

    FTP and Stars in order to operate legally would have to be owned by a person or group who currently holds a licence to operate a Casino or racetrack in the U.S.
    If this happens, on Line sites will withhold tax from Canadian players just like if you were playing in a casino down there.
    Or from any other country.

    No. If they operate similar to pokerstars.fr then it will be irrelevant. Canadians will not be able to play on the US version of the site (ie pokerstars.us).
  • So unless our govt shuts them out we will have to play on a European site ?
  • HVEEPOKER wrote: »
    So unless our govt shuts them out we will have to play on a European site ?

    This has nothing to do with our govt. Yet. The short answer is, yes.

    In the short term Canadians would still for example, play on pokerstars.com with everyone else thats not French or American.

    Should the bill pass, allowing outsiders into pokerstars.us (example) is at least 3 years away.
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    This has nothing to do with our govt. Yet. The short answer is, yes.

    In the short term Canadians would still for example, play on pokerstars.com with everyone else thats not French or American.

    Should the bill pass, allowing outsiders into pokerstars.us (example) is at least 3 years away.
    OKay. I am searching for a story about this now.
    Las Vegas Revue Journal. Search Harry Reid .
    Ceasars and MGM are backing for legalized on line poker.

    First 2 years Licences to be held by casino and racetrack operators or companies who manufacture and supply slot machines to casinos.
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Even if you could, in order to withdraw from any major sites it must be a verified account. That means proof of citizenship (license, etc) and proof that you reside there (phone bill, etc).

    can you not just cash out to another country and transfer back to the states?

    you just need someone in another country to do this for you, like an aunty...
  • darbday wrote: »
    can you not just cash out to another country and transfer back to the states?

    you just need someone in another country to do this for you, like an aunty...

    What %age of the player pool do you think will do this? <1% easily.
  • IF such a bill passes, it seems to me that the most adversely affected will be the thousands of American Supernovas and other online pros who can no longer make any money at PS, FTP, etc. They may never have the same profitablity even when the *.US sites go online since many of the fish will have found something else to do over the 15-month blackout.

    For non-US players, it may become easier to make money at PS/FTP since most of the best players in the world will be booted out. For example, tournaments where the final tables had a lot of Americans may be replaced by Wetts1012, Vekked and other forumers. :D

    For Canadians like me who don't play much at PS/FTP, I don't see much of an impact. D-Day for me won't be until after 2012 if either PartyPoker lets US sharks in to ruin my fi$h pond or the Ontario government pulls a UIGEA.
    Wetts1012 wrote: »
    In the short term Canadians would still for example, play on pokerstars.com with everyone else thats not French or American.
    Should the bill pass, allowing outsiders into pokerstars.us (example) is at least 3 years away.
  • GTA Poker wrote: »
    What %age of the player pool do you think will do this? <1% easily.

    Sure????


    i think it comes down to this, and it sums up all these posts. Blondefish says "If" and its not if, its when. The American government isn't worried about non taxable income. they are worried about sustaining government control. The internet grey's the 'boundries' set by the word country and begins to break down the concept of 'us and them' which government uses to control people. Attacking online gambling isn't a huge conspiracy or anything but its def a part of a larger plan to assert control on the net.

    The US government will aggressively seek to control and to censor it, as they should because its our only hope. The same goes for file sharing and piracy laws. And absolutely with out a doubt they will pressure our government very hard to do the same likely before their policies even go through.

    Right now we are in the process of mirroring their weed laws, even harsher compared to some states...and then we extradited Emery...we were the country that said its ok for the US to extradite someone to charge them under laws, in a jurisdiction they don't fall under, and imprison them in a country in which they did not commit the crime. << this will be very relevant

    The US walks into a country under false pretenses and hangs their leader. They are out of control, even their own control.

    Its hard to imagine a world without an uncensored internet (in that it seems unlikely to happen), but its no doubt on the top of the Intelligence agenda and I think that people need to protect this freedom with aggressive conviction.
  • darbday wrote: »
    This also pertains to censorship of the internet which will be next.....and leads us to wiki leaks...perhaps our savior......

    If you think Assange is a saviour, then you're an idiot. Oh, and if you think there is no censorship on the internet, ask the Chinese.
  • I think "if" this specific legislation passes is the big issue, though there will definitely be some sort of regulation process in the US in the near future, that's for sure.

    Afaik, Canada has already put a similar plan in action, with provincial online poker sites to be run as a network through the Boss Media Network.

    Once all of those rooms are operational (I know there was a bit of a snafu with the BC one), don't be surprised if Canada starts locking out foreign poker room providers.
  • With the caveats for Native casinos, couldn't FTP or Stars just buy out an existing licensee, and "clean" themselves that way? Obviously the big gaming corps in the States like this Bill as it puts them in pole position for any US specific on-line gaming, which is their big complaint.
  • Wetts1012 wrote: »
    Does anyone have coles notes on this?

    My understanding is:

    A) Legislation gets passed.
    B) Effective Feb 11 any site that wants in is "locked out" for 15 months.
    C) Stars and FTP want in, so they will lock out US players for 15 months.
    D) During this time regulation will be developed.
    E) After 15 months it is opened back up and regulated.

    idk I havent read too much on it.

    no....

    pokerstars is out for 15 months once the pill passes, then another 2 years for a total of 39 lol.....


    The U.S. player pool of licensed Internet poker operators would be segregated from the rest of the world for at least three years from the date the first license is issued. After three years, the Commerce Department can determine to allow commingling of the U.S. player pool with players from other jurisdictions where online poker is not illegal.
  • Milo wrote: »
    With the caveats for Native casinos, couldn't FTP or Stars just buy out an existing licensee, and "clean" themselves that way? Obviously the big gaming corps in the States like this Bill as it puts them in pole position for any US specific on-line gaming, which is their big complaint.

    .....can only be issued to applicants who have (a) owned or operated a casino or race track; or (b) manufactured and supplied slot machines to casinos; for at least 5 years prior to passage of the bill. ....

    designed to favor existing U.S. casino interests at the expense of existing, powerful internet poker sites like PokerStars and Full Tilt.


    "They CANNOT get around this black-out period by selling the ownership or the assets of their organization to a "clean" entity."

    <<<< not quite what you suggested but likely they can't
  • Milo wrote: »
    If you think Assange is a saviour, then you're an idiot. Oh, and if you think there is no censorship on the internet, ask the Chinese.

    yes the chinese and north korea are crazy, and need to get connected to the rest of the world. easy to see why the government doesn't allow/support it.

    as for Assange...lets instead find out where exactly we do agree in world views, I would like to start there.....
  • Well, then head on over to the Lounge . . .
Sign In or Register to comment.