devil's hand

Unknown

PokerStars Game #49241215105: Tournament #308638067, $4.00+$0.40 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2010/09/06 16:49:46 PT [2010/09/06 19:49:46 ET]
Table '308638067 9' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: red_nuts 10 (2165 in chips)
Seat 2: BastieFCG (1075 in chips)
Seat 3: texasquail12 (2825 in chips)
Seat 4: AKhunter70 (1210 in chips)
Seat 6: robe43 (1335 in chips)
Seat 7: veron_s_1985 (4245 in chips)
Seat 8: donniesax (1640 in chips)
Seat 9: forboon (4110 in chips)
donniesax: posts small blind 15
forboon: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to forboon [6h 4s]
red_nuts 10: folds
BastieFCG: calls 30
texasquail12: folds
AKhunter70: calls 30
robe43: calls 30
veron_s_1985: calls 30
donniesax: calls 15
forboon: checks
*** FLOP *** [6s 6d 6c]
donniesax: checks
forboon: bets 90
BastieFCG: calls 90
AKhunter70: calls 90
robe43: folds
veron_s_1985: folds
donniesax: folds
*** TURN *** [6s 6d 6c] [Jd]
forboon: bets 90
BastieFCG: calls 90
AKhunter70: folds
*** RIVER *** [6s 6d 6c Jd] [8h]
forboon: bets 3900 and is all-in
BastieFCG: folds
Uncalled bet (3900) returned to forboon
forboon collected 630 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 630 | Rake 0
Board [6s 6d 6c Jd 8h]
Seat 1: red_nuts 10 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: BastieFCG folded on the River
Seat 3: texasquail12 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: AKhunter70 folded on the Turn
Seat 6: robe43 folded on the Flop
Seat 7: veron_s_1985 (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 8: donniesax (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 9: forboon (big blind) collected (630)

Hobbes

I really doubt anyone is paying off that river shove. I'd bet 250 or so and hope to get Ace high to call.

Unknown

Hobbes wrote: »

I really doubt anyone is paying off that river shove. I'd bet 250 or so and hope to get Ace high to call.

don't really need to defend this cause i rarely take the line on the river but wanted to mix it up with my quads lines (ya i have those). i think he had like 700 or something left so he would only have to call 1 in 4 times (or is it one in 3). i really felt he had a medium pair and would fall for it. but ya its an obv thin value bet most of the time.

Wetts1012

darbday wrote: »

don't really need to defend this cause i rarely take the line on the river but wanted to mix it up with my quads lines (ya i have those). i think he had like 700 or something left so he would only have to call 1 in 4 times (or is it one in 3). i really felt he had a medium pair and would fall for it. but ya its an obv thin value bet most of the time.

Dont defend it. Its OK. BTW I tried to fight this before and am pretty sure I lost:

http://www.pokerforum.ca/f53/thoughts-river-overshove-21693/

Unknown

Wetts1012 wrote: »

Dont defend it. Its OK. BTW I tried to fight this before and am pretty sure I lost:

http://www.pokerforum.ca/f53/thoughts-river-overshove-21693/

ya i still think you lost ...but hopefully that means im only nine months behind. maybe this is the point where i start to ignore the masses and become ubber aggro.

iNano78

Should have bet 66 on flop, 222 on turn, 666 on river... imo.

Unknown

iNano78 wrote: »

Should have bet 66 on flop, 222 on turn, 666 on river... imo.

thank you sir....this would be poker at its finest