$52 into $13165 on Full tilt in less than 72hours...

Hi,

Just thought I'd share how well I'm running with you all since I was running terrible for over 2 months just prior to this run. Just to let you all know how quick things can indeed turn.

Just some background info. I play a lot of poker, make most of my poker money playing live cash NLH games at my local casino. I also love MTT tourneys online though, and play those quite a bit as well. I have had some decent results in the past, but after getting off to a really good start on stars for the year this spring, for the last two months I was getting destroyed.

Anyways, to make a long story short, I decided to buy in on full tilt a few weeks ago. So 3 nights ago I had exactly $52 left in my account. I played 3 tourneys, two smaller field tourneys, (a super turbo, and a $26 stud hi/lo, and a $10 rush tourney with 1150 players.

I finished top 5 in the first two tourneys and won the rush tourney for $2600 or so.

The next night played a few more small buy in tourneys and a $75 20k guarantee, missed the first few and then won the $75 tourney (250+ plrs)for $5200.

So now the following day I actually have a bankroll to afford some larger buy ins. I played 17 tourneys ranging from buy ins of around $100 to $26, with a few superturbos sprinkled in. Did not cash in one. I did however win about $700 in a Pot Limit Omahi Hi ring game. Then I signed up for last nights $100 turbo hundo (213 plrs, i think), and won it for $5600+. Bankroll now $13165

Not trying to brag at all, just wanted to share that downs can quickly turn into ups. Looking to continue the run later tonight. Take care!
«1

Comments

  • of course youre trying to brag lol as you should because that is quite a sexy run
  • <-- waiting for the variance.

    and yes it is a brag.
  • Lol, i guess it is a brag, though my intent was as inspiration to those mired in a bad run. It can turn.
  • i'd be bragging my ass off if i were in your shoes
  • Wow. That's amazing. Love the bankroll management. But then again, you a winning cash game player and I suck.
    Nice. I'm jealous.
  • give it a week, will probably be all gone....
  • schabs wrote: »
    give it a week, will probably be all gone....

    Lol, good guys on here I see. I promise you it won't be :) But thanks for your support a**.
  • legit concern, most ppl dont know how to bankroll manage....nothing personal
  • So is schabs new name schass. hehehehe:D:D:D:D
  • if anyone knows me on here im not really the arguing type....im more blunt and straight to the point....
  • schabs wrote: »
    if anyone knows me on here im not really the arguing type....im more blunt and straight to the point....

    Well just so you know, I agree. I certainly was not applying any sort of bankroll management to the $52 I had left on full tilt when I started the run. I make pretty good money playing live and I was using some of these profits to take some shots in online tourneys. Now that I have a very decent starting bankroll online, I am going to use a disciplined strategy to hopefully continue to build it.

    What do you recommend then schabs? I was planning on using CF's strategy (no more than 2% of bankroll on any MTT). Which allows me at my current level to play up to $250 tourneys. I will only be playing in those sparingly though. I will be sticking to the $50-$100 range for the most part. And I will only play when I am motivated and in the mood, same as I do in live poker.

    Admittedly, I have not played much cash online, but I should be playing some; as using MTT's as a sole source of bankroll growth can have huge negative swings in variance. What would you recommend as a starting point for online ring games? I typically play $2/5 and $5/10 NLH (when available) live and consistently beat both of these games for over 10bb/h.

    I know how to play all of the games offered online, so whats my best bet? PLO? NLH heads up? I would limit my buy-ins to around $200 to start off, which seems conservative to me.
  • I wouldnt play with more than 5% of my BR in a mtt, theres also exceptions if your playing well and you feel confident there's nothing wrong with taking a stab at higher limit mtts.

    As far as cash games go I like to feel comfortable at the limit and the buyin I'm playing at. For instance I usually .25/.50, .50/.1 and 1/2 PLO I want to have a MINIMUM 20 buyins according to which limit I play at. .25/50 would be minimum $1000 BR and so on.

    tbh if your playing well at mtts online I'd say stick to that. Alot of people can't handle online cash game swings...alot different than a live game.

    If you can stick to $50-$250 buyins and if you want the odd time and taking a stab at a bigger buyin mtt I don't see a problem there.
  • If you're going from live poker to online, drop your levels to .5/1 or 1/2. The play is EXCEPTIONALLY better. Also get software. I used to be a strictly live player at 1/2 and some 2/5. I had no problem beating the game, but playing the same stakes online would kill me.
    I stopped playing because it was killing my soul/time, felt dirty every time i left, and decided to get a job instead.

    Congrats on your big score. You're that 0.1% that got really lucky. Hitting 3 final tables is a God Run so don't let it get to your head.
  • syphilaids wrote: »
    You're that 0.1% that got really lucky.

    1 in a 1000 doesn't get this lucky ^^' I think you're off a few 0s. Also, there's a lot of passive jealousy in this thread
  • Thanks guys for your thoughts. Thats what I"ve heard about online ring games, how much tougher they play at similar levels to live. I think I could figure it out, but I realize there's an adjustment to be made, and a learning curve. I'll probably start off with some 1/2 plo, but not tonight.

    Tonight I am going to hit the tourney scene hard. I am going to try to satellite into the Monday 1K buy in on tilt. $100 buy in multi table satellite. Also playing a $30 PLO rebuy. I'll let you all know how I make out, good or bad.
  • That's an incredibly great run. Sincerely hope it continues for you.

    Sounds like you have a good understanding of bankroll management and won't be one of the MTT luckboxes who blows it all on $5000 HU SNGs because they think they've got an edge against the world, including livb. :)
  • Well been a couple days since my last post. I did not have good luck on Monday, I played probably 10-12 tournaments cashing in only one.

    Yesterday, I played some PLO max $400 buy in and ended up being ahead $100 for about a 6 hour session. Plan on playing more PLO tonight.

    Bankroll has dipped by a few hundred from the tourneys, but still healthy:)
  • wish I had ur rungood OP:(
  • <
    Always a skeptic.. ;)

    screen name? graph?
  • DennisG wrote: »
    <
    Always a skeptic.. ;)

    screen name? graph?

    We've never seen anyone fib on here before, have we? ;)
  • compuease wrote: »
    We've never seen anyone fib on here before, have we? ;)

    If he's telling the troof he's RJMONEY Poker Results and Statistics - Official Poker Rankings
  • compuease wrote: »
    We've never seen anyone fib on here before, have we? ;)

    I just always have a hard time with new folks showing up with monster brags on their first posts....ask betrthanphil...lol

    I hope I am wrong again.
  • Good find Hobbes...I don't know how you do it. :)
  • Hobbes in an interwebz ninja . . .


    Never annoy Hobbes or bad things will happen to your computer. He can reach through all them tubes and snatch stuff off your hard drive. I have seen it . . . freakishly rubbery arms on that dude.
  • Milo wrote: »
    Hobbes in an interwebz ninja . . .


    Never annoy Hobbes or bad things will happen to your computer. He can reach through all them tubes and snatch stuff off your hard drive. I have seen it . . . freakishly rubbery arms on that dude.

    In light of this information, I hereby decree that Hobbes will now and forever be refered to as MR. FANTASTIC.

    That is all.
  • He does look like a superhero in that mask.
  • DennisG wrote: »
    I just always have a hard time with new folks showing up with monster brags on their first posts....ask betrthanphil...lol

    I hope I am wrong again.

    haha its true. :(
  • Has anyone checked his sharkscope lately to see how he has done since his original post?
  • payperview wrote: »
    Has anyone checked his sharkscope lately to see how he has done since his original post?

    Last I checked on Poker Table Ratings, he was pissing it all away on PLO.
  • Hobbes wrote: »
    PLO is where NLHE bankrolls go to die.

    Hmmm......

    What did PLO ever do to you Hobbes?
Sign In or Register to comment.