exposing cards before show down
Question.....If a players exposes his hole cards before the show down, is his hand automatically folded? This happened 2 times at last game. The player who exposed his cards did so intentionally in an attempt to gain a read, tell on the other player(s) still in the hand. If there is a rule on this & where can I find it or is this more a breech of poker etiquette
1- Cash game, player exposes KK on 4th street when opponent goes all in for $175. Opponent is on semi-buff as he as middle pair, board was Q 8 2 5 opponent calls for KK hand to be folded. I am not in the area at the time, KK get read he wanted and call the all-in, but loses when opponent hit 2 pair on the river. Justice I say...
2- Tournament play- player exposes J high flush on 4 th street after player goes all in. This player after several minutes folds his hand. His opponent flips over trips.
Is there a different ruling on this in cash games VS tourney play....or should both hands have been folded after being exposes intentionally... Thanx inadvance..
1- Cash game, player exposes KK on 4th street when opponent goes all in for $175. Opponent is on semi-buff as he as middle pair, board was Q 8 2 5 opponent calls for KK hand to be folded. I am not in the area at the time, KK get read he wanted and call the all-in, but loses when opponent hit 2 pair on the river. Justice I say...
2- Tournament play- player exposes J high flush on 4 th street after player goes all in. This player after several minutes folds his hand. His opponent flips over trips.
Is there a different ruling on this in cash games VS tourney play....or should both hands have been folded after being exposes intentionally... Thanx inadvance..
Comments
Most of places I play at would consider shown cards dead.
I cannot speak to ring game play. I think it is probably OK.
What's the difference? In ring games the only players effected by the exposed cards are the players still alive in the hand. And, it can be argued that seeing your opponent's cards is an advantage. In a tournament, players not in the hand are effected. If the exposed cards cause a player to do the opposite of what they would have done then the outcome of the hand in question has been changed. That outcome could substantially effect another player.
I know that the rule probably varies from place to place, but in general do you think this stuff should be allowed?
Regards,
all_aces
What if the guy says what his cards are? In this case, the guy could be lying and I usually figure he is. But there was one tournament at Graham's...
I don't think either case is ethical but I'm not sure if it breaks the rules.
Second offence, hand is dead and player gets a 20 minute penalty.
As Jack McLelland used to always say at the beginning of the WSOP: "If one of your cards hits the floor you will be given a twenty minute penalty. If it's an accident then you will accidentally be given a twenty minute penalty."
From the Tournament Directors Assocation rules...
Rule 7: Penalties: A penalty MAY be invoked if a player exposes any card with action pending, if a card(s) goes off the table, if soft-play occurs, or similar incidents take place. Penalties WILL be invoked in cases of abuse, disruptive behavior, or similar incidents.
Rule 36: A player who exposes his cards during the play may incur a penalty, but will not have his hand killed.