Brag: Sattelite god ^^'

Richard~Richard~
in Brags, Beats & Variance
Discuss:

Hand T5-32321796-51 TEXAS_HOLDEM, NO_LIMIT,
T5-32321796-51 played at "Table #2" for USD TC from 2010-03-03 06:15 until 2010-03-03 06:16

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif Seat 2: Richard_5 (4,515 in chips)
Seat 4: harzgirl79 (4,575 in chips)
Seat 6: mz24 (4,265 in chips)
Seat 8: Apathix (3,580 in chips)
Seat 9: Fle16 (13,890 in chips)
Seat 10: zaragatoa2 (6,310 in chips)

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif ANTES/BLINDS
zaragatoa2 posts ante (40),
Richard_5 posts ante (40),
harzgirl79 posts ante (40),
mz24 posts ante (40),
Apathix posts ante (40),
Fle16 posts ante (40),
zaragatoa2 posts small blind (200),
Richard_5 posts big blind (400),

DEALING_HOLE_CARDS
.
:6h :6c

PRE-FLOP

harzgirl79 folds,
mz24 folds,
Apathix raises to 800,
Fle16 calls 800,
zaragatoa2 calls 800,
Richard_5 raises to 4,475 and is all-in,
Apathix folds,
Fle16 folds,
zaragatoa2 folds.

SHOWDOWN
Richard_5 wins 3,440. spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif SUMMARY
Dealer: Fle16
Pot: 3,440
Richard_5, bets 840, collects 3,440, net 2,600
harzgirl79, loses 40
mz24, loses 40
Apathix, loses 840
Fle16, loses 840
zaragatoa2, loses 840

Comments

  • Wetts1012Wetts1012
    Standard?
  • HobbesHobbes
    How many seats?
    How many left?

    Can't see the cards.....
  • Richard~Richard~
    Bubble average is gonna be around 10k. The reship is standard I guess but getting folds from the guys who just put in 10-25% of their stacks isn't
  • T8urmoneyT8urmoney
    This is a horribad spot to ship IMO....3 idiot limpers in front....don't think I'm shipping if it's a satty. You'll likely get called by at least 2 players, and won't be a good percentage to win with 66.....
  • Richard~Richard~
    Don't know if it makes a difference but it's a 3min/level turbo. I though that maybe I could get button to fold KQ after hijack called me and that SB probably would go away since he was a bit of a maniac and is probably flatting a wide range here thinking there'll be a lot of postflop play with these stacks.

    Didn't like getting it in but with 11 BB's my options are pretty limited. Right or wrong it's a wtf moment, I basically double up in this hand for free and villains would probably make more money playing roulette...rigged roulette ???
  • actyperactyper
    I don't understand how you get 3 folds there in a super turbo
  • HobbesHobbes
    Richard~ wrote: »
    Didn't like getting it in but with 11 BB's my options are pretty limited.

    That's why I wanted to know how many players were left and how man seats were to be won.
  • T8urmoneyT8urmoney
    Richard~ wrote: »
    Don't know if it makes a difference but it's a 3min/level turbo. I though that maybe I could get button to fold KQ after hijack called me and that SB probably would go away since he was a bit of a maniac and is probably flatting a wide range here thinking there'll be a lot of postflop play with these stacks.

    Didn't like getting it in but with 11 BB's my options are pretty limited. Right or wrong it's a wtf moment, I basically double up in this hand for free and villains would probably make more money playing roulette...rigged roulette ???

    Most villains aren't this bad, to limp fold for a good portion of their stack....most super turbo's, I think it's safe to say you would average 2 callers.

    Obv it worked out perfect, as everyone folds....but I don't think they all fold (or all but 1) often enough to make this +ev in a satty.
  • Richard~Richard~
    T8urmoney wrote: »
    Most villains aren't this bad, to limp fold for a good portion of their stack....most super turbo's, I think it's safe to say you would average 2 callers.

    Obv it worked out perfect, as everyone folds....but I don't think they all fold (or all but 1) often enough to make this +ev in a satty.

    Why wouldn't it be +EV? Don't know how often I can get it heads up but it should still be +EV against two callers, especially if they share a common card

    (btw, that's not a limp, it's a minraise)
  • HobbesHobbes
    Richard~ wrote: »
    Why wouldn't it be +EV? Don't know how often I can get it heads up but it should still be +EV against two callers, especially if they share a common card

    (btw, that's not a limp, it's a minraise)

    Satty's are not about the WIN. They are about survival. What might be +ev in an MTT can be -ev in a satty.
  • Richard~Richard~
    Hobbes wrote: »
    Satty's are not about the WIN. They are about survival. What might be +ev in an MTT can be -ev in a satty.

    That seems obvious enough, but I still need chips since I'm only halfway through this thing
  • HobbesHobbes
    Richard~ wrote: »
    That seems obvious enough, but I still need chips since I'm only halfway through this thing

    That's why I asked you before about how many seats were to be won.
  • UnknownUnknown
    Hobbes wrote: »
    That's why I asked you before about how many seats were to be won.

    Hobbes, its not even relevant to the play, so stop acting clever.

    Richard~ I dont like that line at all, I gotta get on betsson, some very, VERY bad players there from what I've seen.

    nice luck Richard~.
  • Wetts1012Wetts1012
    boogeyman wrote: »
    Hobbes, its not even relevant to the play, so stop acting clever.

    Richard~ I dont like that line at all, I gotta get on betsson, some very, VERY bad players there from what I've seen.

    nice luck Richard~.

    I knew it was you! Hi Mikey!
  • HobbesHobbes
    boogeyman wrote: »
    Hobbes, its not even relevant to the play, so stop acting clever.

    Who pissed in your Cheerios?
  • UnknownUnknown
    Im quitting smoking and im on a short fuse :(

    Sorry sir.
  • HobbesHobbes
    boogeyman wrote: »
    Im quitting smoking and im on a short fuse :(

    Sorry sir.

    Ahhh gl with that.
  • Richard~Richard~
    Hobbes wrote: »
    That's why I asked you before about how many seats were to be won.

    So much negativity from you in this thread. If you'd have seen that the bubble average would be ~10k maybe things would have been different
  • HobbesHobbes
    Richard~ wrote: »
    So much negativity from you in this thread. If you'd have seen that the bubble average would be ~10k maybe things would have been different

    Not negativity. I asked a simple question and did not get an answer. When you post a hand for discussion you need to provide relavent information which you did not.

    Saying bubble avg would be 10k means nothing to me. For all I know there are 2 tables left and someone on the other table has 70k in chips in front of him.
  • Richard~Richard~
    Hobbes wrote: »
    Not negativity. I asked a simple question and did not get an answer. When you post a hand for discussion you need to provide relavent information which you did not.

    Saying bubble avg would be 10k means nothing to me. For all I know there are 2 tables left and someone on the other table has 70k in chips in front of him.

    That doesn't sound negative to you? If this was a tricky ICM spot I would have given more info, now I just posted this to show just how retarded people can be. A strategy discussion in this part of the forum was never really the point
  • payperviewpayperview
    not a ship imo either
Sign In or Register to comment.
HomeDiscussionsToggle Dark Mode