Selling yourself off.

$1000 buy in for a 300 player tourney:
If you sell off 10% of yourself before the tourney starts the correct price is $100, but what about after players have been knocked out?
Same deal as above but now someone wants to buy 10% after the field has been cut down from 300 to 150 players left?
Does that mean the buyer should be paying $200 for 10% at that point?
(1/2 the field is eliminated therefore double the price)

Is this math correct and fair for both parties? Blonde fish?

Comments

  • Would be based on chip count numbers imo.
  • IF your equity in the tournament has doubled to ~$2K at that point, then it is reasonable, e.g., your 5,000 starting stack has doubled around the average of 10,000 chips. Other factors that I would consider if somebody wanted to buy 10% of my equity in the middle of the tournament would include the stack distributions and the skill of the remaining players in my table and the tournament. For example, if I just got moved from a table full of Sharkscope sharks :arghh: where my equity was $2K to a table with eight Fallsview cash game donkeys who "don't respect your raises", :fish: then my equity has become higher than $2K and I would want more than $200.
    esool wrote: »
    Does that mean the buyer should be paying $200 for 10% at that point?
    (1/2 the field is eliminated therefore double the price)
    Is this math correct and fair for both parties? Blonde fish?
  • Ah yes, chip stack.. Thanks guys.
Sign In or Register to comment.