Options

Official fuck the new layout protest

2»

Comments

  • I prefer the side avatars and love the 100 posts per page. Keep up the good work Kristy.
  • Everything else in this thread I am soooooo meh about.

    Sidebar:

    Are there levels of meh? I mean isn't the point of meh that you can't be SOOOOO meh? Isn't it like Switzerland saying "we're REALLY not getting involved". Just wondering.
  • 800OVER wrote: »
    Sidebar:

    Are there levels of meh? I mean isn't the point of meh that you can't be SOOOOO meh? Isn't it like Switzerland saying "we're REALLY not getting involved". Just wondering.


    If I had a hint of care I wouldn't be soooooo meh, I'd be kinda meh. Sooooo meh = completely meh. yswim?
  • Yup Moose, less scrolling.
  • hey! how did you get those levels, I went to the hardware store and they were out, something about alot of levels going on in a forum:D
  • They were talking about THIS forum Phil, as most of us are in possession of at least 5 levels.
  • Hey Moose

    I checked it out..I'm right, side avatars equal less scrolling.

    PROOF: It is a small difference when looking at only one post, but it is there and I don't have that many screen captures of the old forum on my photobucket. (imagine the difference over 100's of posts)

    Note: You can measure how far down the page they are by using the ads on the right. Top avi ended after "Betfair" Side Avi ended before.


    screen.jpg

    screensideavi.jpg


    I totally get the dislike of the irregular borders. But I'll take function over form.
  • moose wrote: »
    Also not having the posts line on a consistent edge because of the different sizes of side avatars = Annoying and gHey.

    Also note subliminal message...

    picture.php?albumid=7&pictureid=90

    I think this new layout isn't too friendly on images and videos, though this should be fixable but I have no clue how to do it. Jesse, I think it is probably to do with a CSS setting for the width of the profile info section.
  • If I had a hint of care I wouldn't be soooooo meh, I'd be kinda meh. Sooooo meh = completely meh. yswim?

    I consider myself mehducated.
  • Kristy_Sea wrote: »
    Hey Moose

    I checked it out..I'm right, side avatars equal less scrolling.

    I totally get the dislike of the irregular borders. But I'll take function over form.

    I hate you so much my computer/google saavy bitch. Ghost text FTW.



    You are so hot. How did we not french at MXM?



    Arggh. This is so fucked. No more ghost text. Seriously suxors.



    As a picture lover though, side avatars mean smaller pictures and the attachments are what are screwing up the left hand edge. I still hate it.

    Do we have to be more like 2+2?
  • moose wrote: »

    You are so hot. How did we not french at MXM?



    I didn't realize that was on the menu..*sigh* fml.
  • 800OVER wrote: »
    I consider myself mehducated.

    It was meh pleasure.




    BTW, the 100 posts per page is nice at home but this morning I was mobile and it's a serious pain in the ass. I quickly realized how uninterested I was to see everyone's new witty banter when it took minutes to load. IMO the improvements to mobile should have 10 ppp max.
  • i vote "didn't notice a difference until I saw this thread"

    100 post/page is a + in my book tho, so - I change my vote, keep it this way

    but if you were to change it back i wouldn't notice anyway ; )

    might be some ghost test above
  • I hate you all right now, to have the time available in your lives to sit here and debate this makes me want to dish out some serious nut-kicks...
  • zunni74 wrote: »
    I hate you all right now, to have the time available in your lives to sit here and debate this makes me want to dish out some serious nut-kicks...



    HI ZUNNI!:)


    good day at work is it, wonderful time of year isn't it.
  • FWIW, I like the new layout. Plus, I much prefer simplified (or non at all) signatures. I fucking hate forums where every post is followed by a bunch of lame little animations and tons of stupid shit the poster feels he needs to define himself.
    Is the new layout perfection? No. Is it an improvement and/or a step in the right direction? Yes.
  • My votes for sale.......

    and oh, if I didn't notice the difference.......do I = normal?
  • Making the forum wider is gonna be some work..A possible solution im testing now would be uploading the pics here and I have increased the thumnail size..Example here
  • How about now? All url images above have to auto resized and can be clicked for full size image.
  • Scoops wrote: »
    How about now? All url images above have to auto resized and can be clicked for full size image.

    I must admit, forum is alot cleaner then last night.

    Well done scoops.

    Its not so bad after all.

    I could care less about the avatar placement, but now that the casino bucks and all that other cluttering crap is gone, the layout is much, much cleaner.

    I should have waited for fine tuning before jumping all over you.

    I say this layout is a go.

    what a hypocrite eh? LOL
  • Scoops wrote: »
    How about now? All url images above have to auto resized and can be clicked for full size image.


    Better. Could be even better if the banner ads on the top right were moved to allow the posts to spread out. After a few posts there is a couple inches of wasted space at the right of the page.
  • Scoops wrote: »
    Making the forum wider is gonna be some work..A possible solution im testing now would be uploading the pics here and I have increased the thumnail size..Example here


    Kristy, NO !!! STOP!!! Drop that knife!!!! He's trying his best!!!!


    Oh well, I tried my best. Anybody know who the new owner's going to be?
  • Just realized casino cash and the other points one is gone..Fine with me..

    Moving the side ads is a option as I'm sure if they get clicked its not from thread pages.. I'll save that thought..
  • Why isn't the width scalable like *cough* 2+2 and chiptalk.net?
  • moose wrote: »
    Why isn't the width scalable like *cough* 2+2 and chiptalk.net?

    Seems whoever made this style only made a fixed version and will require some coding for that option. Maybe down the road I will but for now I'm happy with how it is.
  • Milo wrote: »
    Kristy, NO !!! STOP!!! Drop that knife!!!! He's trying his best!!!!


    Oh well, I tried my best. Anybody know who the new owner's going to be?


    lol, actually the new, larger thumbnails are totally fine. You can see them clearly...I was in the Awesome pictures of ourselves thread when the shit went down and they're all visible.
  • philliivey wrote: »
    HI ZUNNI!:)


    good day at work is it, wonderful time of year isn't it.

    Thanks for making me smile...
  • zunni74 wrote: »
    Thanks for making me smile...



    I am here for ya!;):)
Sign In or Register to comment.