Playing online
This guy (on pokerstars) just told me he played in 5 tournaments today, and that I made the worst play he saw in any of them.
I didn't say much, because I've been wrong before, but I don't think I did anything wrong.
There was just me, him and a third guy who was all in.
I had nothing, but I figured the guy that was all in for nothing, and the guy who got pissed off for a small pair.
So I made a sizable bet and the guy (that was not all in) folded.
There was no side bet going.
The guy who was all in won the hand, his high card was bigger than mine.
The guy who folded posted a bunch of messages about how dumb my play was, and someone actually agreed with him.
I thought if he folded then I only had the guy who was all in to worry about, but they said that was the funniest excuse they ever heard.
So I don't know, I just don't know...
I didn't say much, because I've been wrong before, but I don't think I did anything wrong.
There was just me, him and a third guy who was all in.
I had nothing, but I figured the guy that was all in for nothing, and the guy who got pissed off for a small pair.
So I made a sizable bet and the guy (that was not all in) folded.
There was no side bet going.
The guy who was all in won the hand, his high card was bigger than mine.
The guy who folded posted a bunch of messages about how dumb my play was, and someone actually agreed with him.
I thought if he folded then I only had the guy who was all in to worry about, but they said that was the funniest excuse they ever heard.
So I don't know, I just don't know...
Comments
I don't believe that was the worst play he saw in 5 tournaments...
There is a strategy that is basically "implied collusion". Basically, if there is someone who is all in, and more than one person has called, AND there is no "side pot" to win, oftentimes they will simply check it down in order to maximize the chances that the all-in player is eliminated.
HOWEVER, most people don't understand that this is a good strategy only when (as compuease said) you are on the bubble for the money, or for a satellite seat. Some people will assume this strategy when there is still several / dozens / hundreds of people left in the tourney, and that's an inappropriate application of it.
Mark
It is by far the dumbest.
Here's an example of a bad time to bet when a player is all in:
Played a step 3 on Stars Saturday:
Sitting 3-handed, tourney pays 2 step #4 tickets, so we're essentially on the bubble.
I'm sitting in the BB with 2 random cards
Button is short-stacked and moves all in (slightly more than BB).
SB (equal chip stack to mine) calls, I call.
Flop came down another 3 random cards, SB moves all-in?
(this is where you'd luv to reach your hand through the monitor and slap the dumb beeatch)
This is what I would call a mentally challenged play.
SB shows top pair, button rivers bigger pair, and remains in the tourney.
Now, as it turns out, it didn't matter, as my hand wouldn't have been best at showdown, but it could have been.
Of course the poker gods were looking down, and the SB ended up being the bubble.
LOL
It's tuesday after a long weekend. I don't think everyone is posting up to par yet....just wait till thursday....hopefully there will be more thought provoking topics by then
Just wait...the day isn't over yet