Umm... Oops? Oh, wait, I sucked out... cool!

PokerStars Game #32127737136: Tournament #190576475, $5.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2009/08/27 16:48:07 ET
Table '190576475 1' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: CarloSandblo (3380 in chips)
Seat 2: pinkslew (4600 in chips)
Seat 3: Vagu666 (1625 in chips)
Seat 4: fonfry (3680 in chips)
Seat 5: Shen64 (1080 in chips)
Seat 7: McAusland (4300 in chips)
Seat 8: xxLonGikaxx (2745 in chips)
Seat 9: TheManninen (1850 in chips)
fonfry: posts small blind 50
Shen64: posts big blind 100
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to McAusland [As 6s]
McAusland: raises 200 to 300
xxLonGikaxx: folds
TheManninen: folds
CarloSandblo: folds
pinkslew: calls 300
Vagu666: raises 1325 to 1625 and is all-in
fonfry: folds
Shen64: folds
McAusland: calls 1325
pinkslew: folds
McAusland said, "the problem with watching a funny *** movie while playing poker. friggin misclicks."
*** FLOP *** [6c 7h 6h]
pinkslew said, "I had jacks"
*** TURN *** [6c 7h 6h] [4s]
*** RIVER *** [6c 7h 6h 4s] [5c]
fonfry said, "wuaooooooooooooooo"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
McAusland: shows [As 6s] (three of a kind, Sixes)
Vagu666: shows [Ks Kh] (two pair, Kings and Sixes)
McAusland collected 3700 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3700 | Rake 0
Board [6c 7h 6h 4s 5c]
Seat 1: CarloSandblo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: pinkslew folded before Flop
Seat 3: Vagu666 (button) showed [Ks Kh] and lost with two pair, Kings and Sixes
Seat 4: fonfry (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Shen64 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: McAusland showed [As 6s] and won (3700) with three of a kind, Sixes
Seat 8: xxLonGikaxx folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: TheManninen folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Tight table, everyone just folding a lot, so I figured I'd throw a raise out and steal. Short stack shoves and stupid me is paying more attention to Love Actually on the TV than the poker game, hear the BEEP BEEP of it being my turn and, not thinking at all as I'm laughing too hard, hit the call button. Whoops. Worked out well though :)

Comments

  • That's called "failing upwards"

    Love Actually...really?
  • lol at Love Actually, btw....is stealing at 50/100 really necessary sir?
  • JohnnieH wrote: »
    That's called "failing upwards"

    Love Actually...really?

    Wife is sorting through her Lego collection that I added to (still just as expensive as typical anniversary presents but way more colourful) and wanted something to have on in the background... that, and it's an awesome movie. C'mon, the guy that flies to the U.S. because he figures that American girls all love British accents and he ends up at a bar with four gorgeous women that all live together with no heat and "we don't even have enough money for pajamas..." Classic.
  • wrote:

    Love Actually...really?

    +1

    Many things people enjoy are best left in private,

    In your case you should consider everything but poker is probably best left in private :-).
Sign In or Register to comment.