Coin flips

In MTT's how often are we trying to avoid coinflips??

Couple of examples. Effective stack sizes:

Hero: 2750
Villain: 1650

Hero picks up AJs on the button, and villain has limped from MP+1, hero raises to 3xBB = 300 and action folds to villain who re-raises all in. In this spot unless he's slowplaying a big pair (pretty unlikely aka I'm not giving this player too much credit) I figure I am up against 7's or 8's in this spot. Or some sort of middle pair. Do I fold to this re-raise or call? Knowing it's very likely a flip?? I ended up calling and he flipped over 8's and I lost to the flip crippling my stack :(

Second example:

Hero: 1705
Villain: 4100

I'm now the short stack at the table and there are two limpers who limp in for 150 each in front of me when I pick up K9s in the SB. I'm not too happy about my hand but with me being the short stack and no significant strength shown I decided to shove pre-flop. I get called by 7's and get knocked out.

I'm just wondering if my tournament poker sucks because I should be playing a bit more tight with my pre-flop shoves and/or if I am overvaluing hands like AJs.

Any thoughts on these spots? And strategies people might use to avoid these (marginal?) coin flip situations?

Comments

  • BlondeFish wrote: »
    I will flip every single time as long as I think I have an $EV of at least +$0.01, and I will end up a millionaire! :D
    Notice what I bolded... It is true that you are +ev with QQ vs AK, however that is only if you know that the op has that hand. You have to factor in the fact that you may just be wrong and he may have KK or AA. You would definitely need some significant amount of $$$ in the pot already to ensure it is +ev... The amount would depend on your confidence level that he has AK.
    BlondeFish wrote: »
    The only reasons stopping me from insta-calling an all-in with QQ vs. AK in the very first hand of the U$10,000 WSOP Main Event Day 1A on July 3 is that the friends who have bought a piece of me may not understand if I lose the +$EV coin-flip
    Then you are really just playing more like a math robot than a poker player..... :) Doing this you are just negating any skill you may have at actually playing the game we all love.. or love to hate, whichever the case may be....

    Remember the risk of ruin, you too can run bad, and taking too many flips increases that possibility.

    We should sit down sometime and have a good discussion..

    Edit.... I replaced Blondefish's original post here by accident......

    Multiple apologies to Blondefish, I accidentally clicked on Edit rather than Quote and ended up saving my post rather than his.... Not sure if there is a way to get your original post back Buddy, do you have a copy be any chance......
  • Hand #1

    How would you have played if you had known for sure what he had? Let's say for the sake of the argument we know he has pocket 7-s. Given that we're not very near the bubble I would say this is a simple pot odds-problem. Everyone else has folded and you have perfect information:

    * The pot is 50+100+100+300+1550=2100

    * It costs you 1350 to call - that gives you pot odds of about 1,5 to 1

    * That means if you can win 4 out of 10 times, then you will gain more chips in the long run by calling.

    * Since you're only a slight underdog here, you can expect to win MORE than 40% of the time, so a call is definately justified. Of course you're going to loose and have just over 1000 in chips left about half of the time. But when you win you have increased your stack with over 60%. That looks like a good option to me.

    The only problem is you really don't know what he has (even if you were right this time). When calculating the odds you better count on that you will in fact face an overpair from time to time. Or AQ or AK which both have you dominated. Harrington has some good examples in his book when he demonstrates how to do the math and reach a reasonable conclusion about what to do, even when you're not sure what your opponent holds. In this particular situation I would guess that it might still be a call perhaps, but a more marginal one.

    If we have seen him playin' big PP:s from early position like this before I would be more drawn towards a fold.
  • I think I really need to pick up some poker theory books. What wold people recommend Harrington or Sklansky or both?

    I seem to hear them talked about the most so I figure these are definitely worthwhile books to read over summer break.
  • Personally I found it much easier and more entertaining to "compute" Harrington on Hold em than the three Sklansky-books I've read. And this even given the fact that I read Sklansky in Swedish translation which theoretically should have made it easier for me. But Sklansky have many valuable points too.
  • Quinner wrote: »
    I think I really need to pick up some poker theory books. What wold people recommend Harrington or Sklansky or both?

    I seem to hear them talked about the most so I figure these are definitely worthwhile books to read over summer break.


    Both are good for beginers to get a feel for a game. But don't get attached too much to them since both advocate cards based strategies( or survival mode as another term) which is a road to nowhere in tourneys. You have to learn to take a shots at others with no cards if you want to accomulate chips instead of sitting and watching your stack diminish as you wait for " good hands". You simply will not be able to keep up with the blinds.
  • Xytras wrote: »
    Both are good for beginers to get a feel for a game. But don't get attached too much to them since both advocate cards based strategies( or survival mode as another term) which is a road to nowhere in tourneys. You have to learn to take a shots at others with no cards if you want to accomulate chips instead of sitting and watching your stack diminish as you wait for " good hands". You simply will not be able to keep up with the blinds.

    I'm not sure if I agree with you when it comes to Harrington. He has many examples in his books when he justifies pushes with very weak hands, especially when your M is down under 10. He is crystal clear that you have to take your chances BEFORE you have been so shortstacked that no one will be afraid of it anymore. Sure Harrington plays tight, but he's also very "math oriented", meaning he's willing to gamble anytime you can prove it's ev+
  • Henjon wrote: »
    I'm not sure if I agree with you when it comes to Harrington. He has many examples in his books when he justifies pushes with very weak hands, especially when your M is down under 10. He is crystal clear that you have to take your chances BEFORE you have been so shortstacked that no one will be afraid of it anymore. Sure Harrington plays tight, but he's also very "math oriented", meaning he's willing to gamble anytime you can prove it's ev+


    All his examples are based on his preflop hand and its not enough to build a dominating stack early. His bluffs also only come to typical blind steal and continuation bet, also not enough. He avoids such stack building bluffs as resteal and informational bluffs in early stages because he's so math oriented.
  • pokerkai wrote:
    Matt Matros wrote what I think is the definitive arguement for whether to flip.

    Card Player Magazine - To Flip or Not to Flip by Matt Matros - Card Player Magazine Article - CardPlayer.com

    I can remember reading this (the idea, not the article) on 2+2 a few years ago and then never finding the thread again.. Thanks for posting it.

    Seriously, it completely defines why you need to embrace flipping the coin in a tournament. The summary is that for every flip you pass up, you need to find yourself in a 60/40 situation relatively soon or else passing on the flip was the wrong play.
  • The article mentions that you could do the experiment of writing down how many times you reach two times the starting stack in tournaments, if the buyin is < 50$ or so you do this a large number of the times (can't remember the last time I got eliminated in the early stages of full tilt 5$ mtt's). There are definitely bigger edges all over the place, I only look to flip if it gives me a chance get more chips without damaging my stack too much.
  • Richard~ wrote: »
    The article mentions that you could do the experiment of writing down how many times you reach two times the starting stack in tournaments, if the buyin is < 50$ or so you do this a large number of the times (can't remember the last time I got eliminated in the early stages of full tilt 5$ mtt's). There are definitely bigger edges all over the place, I only look to flip if it gives me a chance get more chips without damaging my stack too much.

    Well belive it or don't, what fucking ever. It's your money.
  • I might be arrogant but I definitely think I have a 5 or more times better chance than the average player in the games I play to take down the tournaments. You can embrace flips if you want to but I won't have the patience to play enough games to make that profitable. Herschelw had an early game method I liked and I think it's similar to Doyle Brunson in super system 2. If you don't like flipping too much it may be worth to read that for some additional thoughts.

    Edit: That being said, I raise, reraise and shove AK and QQ like there's no tomorrow, not because I want to flip with them but because I think they'll dominate the messed up ranges my opponents are calling with
  • Richard~ wrote: »
    Edit: That being said, I raise, reraise and shove AK and QQ like there's no tomorrow, not because I want to flip with them but because I think they'll dominate the messed up ranges my opponents are calling with
    Exactly right on this, when you are doing the raising/pushing and you end up in a flip, fine... By pushing you have the additional equity that a fold by op may give you. I don't like just calling for a likely flip either, especially early...
    However if I think op is pushing with something I likely have dominated, ie he may be pushing with any A and I have AK/AQ, I call all day long. Depends on the op, the situation, etc... I think too many players will call off their stack on a likely flip too often. Usually I find that it is the players who don't have confidence in their play post flop that get into this or perhaps those that simply don't have the patience for deeper stacked tournament poker. YMMV..
Sign In or Register to comment.