How to adjust for a maniac
A question for Dave, or anyone else who would like to answer:
What adjustments to your play (both pre-flop and after the flop) do you make when there is a maniac at your table?
I spent a few hours playing 2/4 on PartyPoker last night with a genuine maniac: this guy just kept the bet/raise button checked. I was surprised that a loose/passive preflop strategy some players were using seemed to work really well, and I'd like to know whether it was actually correct, or just a run of good cards for a few players.
What adjustments to your play (both pre-flop and after the flop) do you make when there is a maniac at your table?
I spent a few hours playing 2/4 on PartyPoker last night with a genuine maniac: this guy just kept the bet/raise button checked. I was surprised that a loose/passive preflop strategy some players were using seemed to work really well, and I'd like to know whether it was actually correct, or just a run of good cards for a few players.
Comments
I like to use his or her agressiveness to my advantage, by forcing out weak holdings with re-raises. I'd rather be heads up with 1 player with a random 2 cards (the maniac) v.s. my 2 strong cards, then allowing 1/2 the table to come into the pot. Cold call his raises less, and re-raise your strong hands more. I often follow around maniacs using the buddy feature on many of the online poker rooms.
You need to often call down the maniac with hands you would normally fold. Second and thrid pair are good examples, but often with even less. Never semi-bluff the maniac, and (obvously) never bluff him/her.
I have a friend who will often put in a straddle (under the gun blind raise) at our local poker room. This creates a lot of action, and people perceive him as a maniac. The truth is, he isn't a maniac, he is just very agressive, and sometimes a bit wild. He does know his poker, and is a consistent winner. What I've noticed is that these blind raises cause many players at the table to cold call the raise with hands they never would think of calling otherwise. This is why isolating is so important, because it is often the other players in the hand who will beat you, if not the maniac him or herself.
On a side note, my friend will get paid off on his big hands more then anyone I know. He can literally flop 4 of a kind, and get callers (and sometimes raisers) all the way to the river. Not that I am suggesting playing like he does
The players that seemed to be doing the best were those immediately to the maniac's *right*, not his left. After thinking about why this might be, I realized that having a maniac on your left means that you will always know if any of the non-maniac players are still in the hand when it gets around to you. It's almost like being permanently on the button.
These players were seeing a lot of flops (for 2 bets), and basically folding their mediocre hands if anyone other than the maniac was still in, but playing them to the river if they were heads up with him. It seemed to work really well, so I'm considering trying to sit to his left the next time I spot a maniac.
http://pokerforum.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=1439
ScottyZ
Regards,
all_aces
No I don't.
Can you imagine how brutal it would be to sit on the maniac's immediate right if a smart player was to his immediate left? *shudder*
ScottyZ