HOw should I have played this?

DennisG

Was there another way to get paid better? I figured Buck had the big card...no real reads yet on anyone...Should I have known he didn't? I wasn't concerned too much about rituallion..


Full Tilt Poker Game #8227266285: $50 + $5 Sit & Go (62588692), Table 1 - 25/50 - No Limit Hold'em - 22:14:27 ET - 2008/09/25
Seat 1: Buck2079 (1,445)
Seat 2: GuyGuyerson9 (1,360)
Seat 3: obtenir argent (2,235)
Seat 4: wgs0319 (1,990)
Seat 5: Gumpf (1,020)
Seat 6: ken1940 (990)
Seat 7: rituallion (1,000)
Seat 8: Bcboy72 (1,340)
Seat 9: Jerryjay06 (2,120)
rituallion posts the small blind of 25
Bcboy72 posts the big blind of 50
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Bcboy72 [Ks Kd]
Jerryjay06 folds
Buck2079 calls 50
GuyGuyerson9 folds
obtenir argent folds
wgs0319 calls 50
Gumpf folds
ken1940 calls 50
rituallion raises to 100
Bcboy72 has 15 seconds left to act
Bcboy72 raises to 250
Buck2079 calls 200
wgs0319 folds
ken1940 folds
rituallion calls 150
*** FLOP *** [4c Ac 6d]
rituallion checks
Bcboy72 checks
Buck2079 checks
*** TURN *** [4c Ac 6d] [9h]
rituallion bets 50
Bcboy72 calls 50
Buck2079 calls 50
*** RIVER *** [4c Ac 6d 9h] [3d]
rituallion bets 50
Bcboy72 calls 50
Buck2079 calls 50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
rituallion shows [Kc Qd] Ace King high
Bcboy72 shows [Ks Kd] a pair of Kings
Buck2079 mucks
Bcboy72 wins the pot (1,150) with a pair of Kings
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1,150 | Rake 0
Board: [4c Ac 6d 9h 3d]
Seat 1: Buck2079 mucked [2s 2d] - a pair of Twos
Seat 2: GuyGuyerson9 didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: obtenir argent didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: wgs0319 folded before the Flop
Seat 5: Gumpf didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: ken1940 (button) folded before the Flop
Seat 7: rituallion (small blind) showed [Kc Qd] and lost with Ace King high
Seat 8: Bcboy72 (big blind) showed [Ks Kd] and won (1,150) with a pair of Kings
Seat 9: Jerryjay06 didn't bet (folded)

g2

Ihaveyourname wrote: »

Was there another way to get paid better?

You play $50 SNGs and you're asking if you could have made more from a pair of 2s or K high? Really?

Only way you might have made more is by shoving pre-flop.

/g2

P.s. add rituallion to your friend list

DennisG

I was more concerned...that should I have been able to tell from the betting that he wasn't with the ace...
Yes, I play 50 and 100, and I do alright..but everyone here seems to be much above that, so, no harm in asking right? I have learned a lot here...and I know my play is far from good.

MarcoGD

Is it just me or does that look like pretty weak play for a $50 SNG?

philliivey

yes!!!!!!!! if it is like that why am i not playin those:)

MarcoGD wrote: »

Is it just me or does that look like pretty weak play for a $50 SNG?

philliivey

agree 100 percent,i would have just called those stupid small bets also.

g2 wrote: »

You play $50 SNGs and you're asking if you could have made more from a pair of 2s or K high? Really?

Only way you might have made more is by shoving pre-flop.

/g2

P.s. add rituallion to your friend list

JimmyHo

with an ace on the flop, you are pretty well done; not unless you happen to hit a king on the turn or river; then you might have made more money with the other player holding the case king. I would bet on the flop to see if you get any resistance and try and take it down there. Nobody else really hit so your not making any more money on this hand.

adpro

I think a bet on the flop would have shown where the other players were. You bet pre-flop, why didn't you represent that bet by betting on the flop? If someone called pre-flop with A9- suited (not unheard of), you may have been able to push them out.

But yeah, I agree that the calls pre-flop would suggest that someone must have an A. Next time just try to think about putting out a feeler bet and represent your pre-flop raise on the flop. I'll try to take the same advice, , cause I probably would have done the exact same thing. That A is scary in that situation.