Thanks To ScottyZ and Dave Scharf

2»

Comments

  • Wow, BBC Z, why all the negative comments. Just let it be.

    Also, Dave, did you know that Negreanu put you on a list for TEAM CANADA Poker Team if there was an event for the Olympic. It was about 6-7 on the list.
  • Wow. I did not know that. Kewl.
  • I just want to say that, firstly, I am extremely happy for All Aces. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it was me, the "Teach", that took All Aces, that erudite son-of-a-gun out of Zithal's tournament. Yes, I completely outplayed this pseudo-celebrity. Devin, if you have a section in the video for "extremely aggressive players", I am your man. ScottyZ has played with me enough to confirm that I am your man for this.

    To Dave Scharf:
    I am a High School Teacher in Kitchener and would to ANYTHING to get my name in C.P.P. Magazine. C'mon want to I have to do? I'll play you heads-up! I'll play Devin blind folded! Anything. If you are ever looking for something interesting to write about, just call - I'll be there.
  • I wrote want to I have to do instead of "what" do I have to do! My chances are ruined.
  • Devin, if you have a section in the video for "extremely aggressive players", I am your man. ScottyZ has played with me enough to confirm that I am your man for this.

    Yes, I'd say that Teach puts in the occasional raise. :)

    ScottyZ
  • teach wrote:
    I wrote want to I have to do instead of "what" do I have to do! My chances are ruined.

    Yes, I think you are correct. :tongue:
  • Hmmm.... well teach, I do believe we're tied in the 'I'm gonna make trouble for him in this tournament' department.... ;)
  • Nice Job D. Can't wait to see the video.

    FWIW - I agree with BBC Z. So "Pay that man his money..." I think 1 cent should cover it, actually that is too kind, since you'll probably be doubling his bankroll..... ZING!
  • Lol... thanks Al. Maybe I'll have a screening party. ;) Most--if not all--of the material is probably stuff you already know, but I still think it's good for people to review 'the basics' every now and again, to re-focus their game. We play, and certain decisions are automatic. This project was an exercise in me asking myself (and, by extension, Scott and Dave) why are they automatic? Sometimes the answers are hard to put into words.

    Putting all of that aside, I think it's safe to say that watching it should be a very amusing experience. Not unlike when you watched your cameo on the news with your buddies. :)

    Cheers,
    all_aces
  • Wow. I did not know that. Kewl.
    He wrote Dave Sharf, but I think its you :D
    http://www.recpoker.com/article.php?gID=1&ID=443151
  • AK*1 wrote:
    FWIW - I agree with BBC Z. So "Pay that man his money..." I think 1 cent should cover it, actually that is too kind, since you'll probably be doubling his bankroll..... ZING!
    First off, congratulations to All_Aces on his DVD. I, like many of you enjoyed the quiz and are very happy for him. But I'd also like to come to the defense of BBC Z. The way I read his post, he's just a little annoyed that the real intention of All Aces' quiz wasn't specified, which is a complaint that I can understand. It wasn't lying but it was misleading. Personally, not a big deal to me but I can definetely see how that would rub some people the wrong way. And he never asked for any money for himself so i don't think so some of the comments directed towards BBC Z are warranted. Anyways, that's just my 2cents. Congrats again Aces.
  • Fair enough, and I totally understand what you're saying. As I said to my g/f though, if his concerns had been worded in a less offensive way, I wouldn't have taken offense to them. I'm a very reasonable person (or so I like to think :) ), and I've learned to pay attention to what people have to say, even if I don't agree with them.

    However, when a post starts off like this:
    No offence, but it seems pretty low to use this poker forum as a cheap proof reader for your for-profit venture.
    and ends like this
    I'm disappointed aces..
    it's tough to be 'very reasonable', and 100% objective, and detached.

    When people post on forums, it's all about the words you choose to express yourself, because people can't hear the nature of your 'voice'. So, while his points may have been debatable, I found it impossible to debate them, because I was, frankly, shocked at the tone that was used to express his concerns. It was kind of mean, IMHO at least. Maybe some will accuse me of being too sensitive, but really, I'm not very sensitive at all. ;) Decidedly insensitive, at times.... but like I said, all of this stuff is subjective. In my case, it's also personal, because I took it personally, so I'm unable to see any validity in his points (if they are indeed valid) from a purely objective standpoint.

    Regards,
    all_aces
  • I forgot one thing. I've affectionately re-named this thread, in my head: "Quizgate".
  • it certainly is funny how words become like a dagger on the river, filling out a horrible odds str8, bad beating and killing your allin pocket pair of aa
    that's poker
    that's chat
  • Well it seems everybody had something to say on this thread so I figured I'd follow along.

    Congrats Aces! That is pretty cool.

    Blow it out you ass BBC. (Please don't edit that Scotty)

    Daniel named Dave to team Canada? That must be a HUGE honour. He is IMO the best player in the world.

    Teach SHOULD be in CPP. I don't think an article would be the right idea.
    See,Ithink it should be an add like "WPT brought to you by pokerstore.ca" only reading "CPP brought to you by the Teach. Paying off the Kitchener group through rain, sleet or snow."
  • I admit me ego has felt pretty good all day about that Daniel post. I shared a study group with him some years ago, but was definately the student.
  • Way to go aces. You da man. Let me guess. ummmmm $19.95? lol
Sign In or Register to comment.