Very Funny Post from RPG
For those that don't "RGP" I found this gem...
though some old school types prefer the duration method. However, the
newly formed Pissing Tournament Directors Association just promulgated the
official rules for the 2005 WSOP (World Series of Pissing), which, as you
know, will be moved this year to the Strip. In the new rules, the PTDA has
adopted the volume method, where the pissing is done directly into a
calibrated vessel much like a glass measuring cup, and the greatest volume
wins. There have been a lot of complaints from the pissing community about
these rules (pissing & moaning, really) alleging that the volume method
takes all the skill out of the game, and makes it a . . . well. . . a
crapshoot. (This analogy has in turn drawn complaints from those who
prefer crapping contests, who argue that people new to the crapping world
may become confused about what they are watching, particularly in these
days of televised excretory tournaments.)
In any case, the complaints from the traditionalists range from the
argument that pissing into a vessel (as opposed to the more traditional
"line in the sand" method employed until recently in the deserts of Texas
and Las Vegas) takes all the fun out of it as a spectator sport; to the
more practical strategic considerations. For example, they argue, one
might make a huge bet when he sees his opponent's stream begin to dwindle,
only to see his opponent shake, dance, and start pissing with renewed
vigor, thus winning "on the river," so to speak.
Proponents of the new rules respond that the volume method will make the
sport more accessible to women, who have traditionally had a significant
disadvantage in the distance contests, and were thus confined to the
"limit" tournaments.
I personally believe the rule change, combined with the increased
television coverage of the sport, will be good for pissing. Oh, sure, you
might say that all these kids coming into the game, with their shiny new
prostates and their all-in pissing strategy (where they don't even look at
what's in their hand, they just empty their bladder) are ruining
tournaments. People complain about "the Brew," whose members came to this
year's WSOP and dominated several events simply by drinking copius amounts
of lager before and during the tournaments. To these naysayers I say: Let
'em come (or actually, go). They're just dead urine anyway. In the end,
skill and experience will dominate over youth and enthusiasm.
Hope this answered your question. For more details, check out
rec.gambling.piss
In home pissing contests, most people determine the winner by distance,How does one determine the winner in a pissing contest anyway?
though some old school types prefer the duration method. However, the
newly formed Pissing Tournament Directors Association just promulgated the
official rules for the 2005 WSOP (World Series of Pissing), which, as you
know, will be moved this year to the Strip. In the new rules, the PTDA has
adopted the volume method, where the pissing is done directly into a
calibrated vessel much like a glass measuring cup, and the greatest volume
wins. There have been a lot of complaints from the pissing community about
these rules (pissing & moaning, really) alleging that the volume method
takes all the skill out of the game, and makes it a . . . well. . . a
crapshoot. (This analogy has in turn drawn complaints from those who
prefer crapping contests, who argue that people new to the crapping world
may become confused about what they are watching, particularly in these
days of televised excretory tournaments.)
In any case, the complaints from the traditionalists range from the
argument that pissing into a vessel (as opposed to the more traditional
"line in the sand" method employed until recently in the deserts of Texas
and Las Vegas) takes all the fun out of it as a spectator sport; to the
more practical strategic considerations. For example, they argue, one
might make a huge bet when he sees his opponent's stream begin to dwindle,
only to see his opponent shake, dance, and start pissing with renewed
vigor, thus winning "on the river," so to speak.
Proponents of the new rules respond that the volume method will make the
sport more accessible to women, who have traditionally had a significant
disadvantage in the distance contests, and were thus confined to the
"limit" tournaments.
I personally believe the rule change, combined with the increased
television coverage of the sport, will be good for pissing. Oh, sure, you
might say that all these kids coming into the game, with their shiny new
prostates and their all-in pissing strategy (where they don't even look at
what's in their hand, they just empty their bladder) are ruining
tournaments. People complain about "the Brew," whose members came to this
year's WSOP and dominated several events simply by drinking copius amounts
of lager before and during the tournaments. To these naysayers I say: Let
'em come (or actually, go). They're just dead urine anyway. In the end,
skill and experience will dominate over youth and enthusiasm.
Hope this answered your question. For more details, check out
rec.gambling.piss