Richard~;326532 wroteyou seem to kinda be rambling again. We need to win to make money yes, if he makes a larger mistake with his shoving range than his calling range we should focus that part of our game
Im suggesting that since there are no ICM factors and its WTA that we shouldn't be weighing out the value of how plus ev a shove is compared to a call (what im suggesting might be wrong though?). But we should simple take them all, because each play is $'s in our pocket (or no?).
That part is still subject to not wanting to cause him to open up..but....
and finally, the way unexploitable ranges work, if you're shoving on the line you make money from him going too tight and too wide but if you tweak your line either way you're exploitable to him adjusting
Yes but we are talking about players who don't know nash and therefore don't know how to adjust. He will intuitively adjust but it will rarely be anywhere near 44%...
If the players knows nash we will simply shove nash.
My new 'thesis' here is
if we are folding hands from the equilibrium jamming ranges, while effectively short stacked heads up, then we have no future edge to make up for folding non negative ev hands.