DrTyore;217291 wroteI can't believe the amount of discussion on this one...
You have to put your money in here. You're the second shortest stack at the table, the shortest one is in already. Here's the reasons for calling
A: It doubles the chances of eliminating the shortest stack
B: You have an extremely well coordinated hand that provides three likely ways to win (set, straight, flush possibilities)
C: You're getting nearly 3:1 on your money if you get it all in.
here's the reasons to fold
A: Maybe if I fold I can possibly survive until one of the other big stacks is kind enough to take out the medium sized stacks and I can squeak by that last position - unless the small stack manages to double up on THIS round, then I have to squeak by two positions.
Folding guarantees you become the smallest stack on the table, either you're 10/10, or 11/11 if the micro stack doubles. Oh, and let's not forget folding means you're stuck for another 20% of your stack when it's your SB next.
CALL - there is no debate or question here. edit: Sorry, put yourself all in.
Mark
PLO Satty's are like interspecies relationships....you gotta do things you really never thought of doing.
Here's the way I look at it:
To get my ticket, I will
A: have to get extremely lucky (ie. braindead midstack losing his mind and playing a pot against big stack)...this does happen, but rare
B: have to win a minimum 1 more pot (and 1 pot would probably get me there)
Now, if I try to win this particular pot, I have to win a 3-way AIPF.....I don't like those odds.
If I fold to my BB, I give someone else a chance to make an error, or, worst case, I go in against likely a 2 or 3 way pot. Although my odds aren't as good to win a 3-way with any 4 cards as they are with these particular 4 cards.
It's 2 days later, and I'm still second guessing myself on this one.