zunni74;181815 wroteContemplating laying down pre-flop monsters because you fear a suck-out is horrible play..
Agreed. Laying down a monster pre-flop simply out of fear of getting 'cracked' would be a huge leak and very stupid.
A rare pre-flop lay down of a monster because it is the mathematically correct play is good, solid poker. The mathematics of poker don't just involve hand A is XX% vs hand B.
zunni74;181815 wroteAA's are one of those things you can't screw up pre-flop.
Cash game - okay. Often not true in satellites when nearing the bubble. Sometimes (albeit rare) not true in sit-n-goes, at final tables or when nearing the bubble in a regular MTT.
Are you telling me you are calling yourself all-in pre-flop with AA for 100,000 chips in a satellite where 1st to 30th get the same prize, 33 players are left and 31st to 33rd currently have less than 5,000 chips?
Never say never.
zunni74;181815 wroteI'm not even a fan of that SNG bubble situation, I call there and hopefully triple up. Is one player going to get eliminated?? Yes, but would you rather someone gets eliminated and you have a reasonable stack or still have your crappy short stack and likely worse cards to go with it?
IF the AA holds up, you would actually quadruple up and still NOT have a reasonable stack. 4100 chips. (Likely) 3 handed. In the SB for 500 next hand. 1500 in the pot before anything happens. Even after quading up, you would still have to immediately go all-in again with virtually anything. Lose and you probably finish 3rd ... gaining nothing over folding the previous hand and not risking losing that 3rd (or possibly 2nd) place cash.
If I'm not mistaken, there's a good 2+2 podcast with Dan Harrington that covers this subject. If I get a chance tonight, I'll try to find it.