A queston on blinds.

My regular poker game consists of a group of 8-10 guys playing mini-NL holdem tournements (generally winner takes all). Several of the guys were hesitant to intruduce blinds in to the game, feeling it was too much money to anti. We all buy in for $20, and get $30 in chips, no re- buyins allowed. Everyone is now convinced that blinds are the way to go, so I was wondering how much they should start at, and how often they should increase, and to how much?

thanks,
Irah

Comments

  • With initial stack size 30, you'll have to keep the blinds very small and moving up slowly. Something like:

    1-2
    1-3
    2-4
    3-6
    4-8
    5-10

    with maybe 10 or 15 minutes per round.

    You could tweak this a little and make the initial stack sizes 40, and delete the 1-3 level. (Hey, that looks familiar...) ;)
    Several of the guys were hesitant to intruduce blinds in to the game, feeling it was too much money to anti.

    Do you mean to say that you previously had no blinds in your tournaments? Was there any ante? Having blinds is pretty standard, it's usually the *ante* that's optional (or in the case of tournaments, usually there's no ante at the beginning but it may be added to the later levels).

    ScottyZ
  • Previously, we had no blinds, just antes. The antes would begin at 25cents, and double with each eliminated player.
    If we went to your blind structure, would you suggest keeping the antes, or removing them?
  • I'd say no ante ante with the blind structure I suggested.

    And if you like having units of 0.25 tournament chips (although, I find a minimum unit of 1 to be less confusing), you can change the blind structure around a little bit. For example, the blinds in the first few rounds could even be something like:

    0.75-1.50
    1.50-3.00
    2.00-4.00
    etc

    If you do like to use antes (there are some good reasons to do this, although it's non-standard), you'd have to keep the blinds *really* small with an initial stack of 30. Maybe something like:

    0.25-0.50, ante 0.25
    0.50-1.00, ante 0.25
    1.00-2.00, ante 0.50
    1.50-3.00, ante 0.50
    2.00-4.00, ante 1.00

    What I'd really suggest to make things easier is to make the starting stacks much bigger. Then a nice tournament structure (if you prefer antes) could be something like:

    Initial stacks 400

    2-4, ante 1
    3-6, ante 1
    4-8, ante 2
    5-10, ante 2
    10-15, ante 3
    10-20, ante 5
    15-30, ante 5
    20-40, ante 10

    This structure is pretty unusual in that the antes are much higher than usual (relative to the blinds). Note that in most rounds you are actually paying more ante than blinds.

    If you don't really prefer antes all that much, you could even try the same blind structure (but with the antes removed) and maybe lower the initial stacks to 200 or 300.

    As with all tournament structures, I can really only give you a rough idea, and you always want to be looking for ways to adjust the structure to meet your needs. E.g. Would you like the tournament to run longer or storter next time? Was the outcome based too much on luck rather than skill? Or did the skilled players have an overwhelming advantage?

    ScottyZ
  • Thanks for the advice!

    I think the only problem with such large initial stacks (400), is the tourney length. Sometimes we try to play more than one in a night, thats the reason for the small stacks; however, I like the blind structures you provided, and well test it out this weekend.

    thanks,
  • If you find the tournament is running too long as it is, you can try cutting out the first 1 or 2 levels, or just making all the levels shorter.

    It's actually not the initial stack size by itself that makes the tournament longer, it's the stack size relative to the blinds that matters. As a silly example, you can have a very quick tournament with initial stack size 10,000 (huge!), and 5,000-10,000 blinds. :) (Particularly if this tournament is heads-up.)

    However, if you leave the blinds *fixed* larger stacks will certainly lead to longer tournaments in general. I certainly wouldn't suggest starting with 400 chips and playing the structure:

    0.25-0.50, ante 0.25
    0.50-1.00, ante 0.25
    1.00-2.00, ante 0.50
    1.50-3.00, ante 0.50
    2.00-4.00, ante 1.00

    :)

    ScottyZ
  • Blinds are essentially a bet made by the people without knowing their cards to force action with the other players. Thats why the button becomes a fairly important position because then the 'dealer' gets to see the other players reactions to their cards without having to put up any money. Then when play passes back to the BB, he/she still has a chance to raise which then constitutes as him playing his cards or he can just check it.
  • Blinds are essentially a bet made by the people without knowing their cards to force action with the other players. Thats why the button becomes a fairly important position because then the 'dealer' gets to see the other players reactions to their cards without having to put up any money.

    Right. Also, this is (at least partially) the *reason* to have blinds instead of antes alone. You are taking away some of the power of the button by making the button act 3rd last pre-flop. The blinds are also positioned to force the two players in the worst (post-flop) position to put some money in the pot, which both gets the action going, and draws into the action the two least likely players who would have come in voluntarily.

    ScottyZ
  • How many chips do you have? I run bi-weekly tourneys. We start with $25,000.00 in chips. Blinds start at 100-200, 200-300, 300-500, 500-1000, 1500-3000, 2000-4000, 6000-8000, 10000-20000, 20000-40000 Tourney never passed this level (20000-40000). levels are 20-25 minutes, usually last 3-3.5 hrs. Play 2 or 3 games per tourney nite. If you want shorter games drop level time to 10-12 minutes. First started with $1000 in chips, but we like the high chip count, more fun betting $10,000 then $1.00
  • Man, that's too many zeroes for me. :)

    IMO, a tournament where the small blind in round one is 1 tournament chip is the nuts. 8)

    ScottyZ
  • Woah ScottyZ, I just spent the last 5 mins trying to figure out what you said in your last post. Would you mind rewriting it because I'm sure it was important, or ytou can leave me here hanging trying to figure it out... :D
  • oops, double post.
  • You mean, when I said
    IMO, a tournament where the small blind in round one is 1 tournament chip is the nuts.

    ?

    I just mean that it is usually a sign of a well-thought out (and easy to play) blind structure when the first round blinds are something like 1-2.

    Of course, that's not all that matters, but it's a good start.

    I think there are also some very subtle advantages that a good player has over bad players when tournament blind structures are small.

    ScottyZ
  • Scotty, what are the subtle advantages for a better player in a lower blind structure game?
  • Bad players tend to undervalue small amounts of chips.

    ScottyZ
Sign In or Register to comment.