This Guy Thought His Quads Would Hold?

Shame DoNs dont have a bad beat jackpot...

PokerStars Game #27183900257: Tournament #156548352, $10.00+$0.40 Omaha Pot Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2009/04/17 8:09:52 ET
Table '156548352 1' 10-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: MightyBishop (1395 in chips)
Seat 2: thekendziors (1360 in chips)
Seat 3: skeet1000 (2365 in chips)
Seat 4: dokonoko (3160 in chips)
Seat 5: koster25 (2885 in chips)
Seat 7: Monteroy (1000 in chips)
Seat 9: seehase (1415 in chips)
Seat 10: papamarco83 (1420 in chips)
papamarco83: posts small blind 50
MightyBishop: posts big blind 100
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Monteroy [Tc 9d 3h 4h]
thekendziors: folds
skeet1000: folds
dokonoko: calls 100
koster25: folds
Monteroy: folds
seehase: folds
papamarco83: calls 50
MightyBishop: checks
*** FLOP *** [Ah 5h Qs]
papamarco83: checks
MightyBishop: bets 200
dokonoko: calls 200
papamarco83: folds
*** TURN *** [Ah 5h Qs] [Qh]
MightyBishop: bets 200
dokonoko: raises 1100 to 1300
MightyBishop: calls 895 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (205) returned to dokonoko
*** RIVER *** [Ah 5h Qs Qh] [Jh]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
MightyBishop: shows [Qc 8h Qd 4c] (four of a kind, Queens)
dokonoko: shows [8c 7c Th Kh] (a Royal Flush)
dokonoko collected 2890 from pot

Comments

  • I don't get your point. The guy lost to a one outer. You blame the guy for shoving with quads? WTF?

    Let's talk about the dumbass who got his chips in with the nut flush on a paired board...
  • I think that was sarcasm Moose...lol

    Definitely a nasty beat!
  • moose wrote: »
    I don't get your point. The guy lost to a one outer. You blame the guy for shoving with quads? WTF?

    Let's talk about the dumbass who got his chips in with the nut flush on a paired board...


    Umm duh, I assumed the other player had AAAx for quad aces. Easy fold of QQxx on that turn.

    Or, I just thought it was funny hand as 1 outers go, with made quads losing to a badly played Royal flush.

    You choose.
  • Monteroy wrote: »
    Umm duh, I assumed the other player had AAAx for quad aces. Easy fold of QQxx on that turn.

    Or, I just thought it was funny hand as 1 outers go, with made quads losing to a badly played Royal flush.

    You choose.

    Do you know you must use ONLY TWO cards? So AAAx doesn't make quad aces...
  • lol @ this thread.
  • That beat must have been a 1st for online poker.
  • payperview wrote: »
    That beat must have been a 1st for online poker.

    For online poker? Not so much

    Is it good enough for a quick post in a bad beat section of a message board? Probably

    However, you can feel free to post all of the hands you were in that saw quads lose to a royal to put me in my proper place...

    jacktenoff wrote: »
    Do you know you must use ONLY TWO cards? So AAAx doesn't make quad aces...

    Of course it does with an ace on the board, otherwise you need AAAA in your hand, duh.
  • I'll see if I can dig up the tourney hand where the guy actually types, I have quads but I believe you have a royal and folded and the winner flashes the Royal. Siiiiiick.

    On a good note I flopped quads yesterday and got paid off every street by K high. Whee!

    Sorry I missread the sarcasm in the thread title. Dumb moose need winky. ;)
  • moose wrote: »
    I'll see if I can dig up the tourney hand where the guy actually types, I have quads but I believe you have a royal and folded and the winner flashes the Royal. Siiiiiick.

    On a good note I flopped quads yesterday and got paid off every street by K high. Whee!

    Sorry I missread the sarcasm in the thread title. Dumb moose need winky. ;)

    Your avatar is affecting your judgement. It's affecting mine as well.
  • Losing to a runner-runner royal with Quads.

    Thank god it was only a $10 sng and not a cash game.
Sign In or Register to comment.