Yeah nothing personal. I was just agreeing that the points for HU seem a little high and other think it is low. If anything I rather they stay the same then change because the change I perceive would only be a few points +/- here or there.
Isn't this forum full of like students and math geeks? Where's my damn proof already? It's gotta be when you apply this strucuture to a bell curve distribution..
I was just agreeing that the points for HU seem a little high and other think it is low.
If anything I rather they stay the same then change because the change I perceive would only be a few points +/- here or there.
I'll throw my 2 cents in here for some discussion and not a knock at the current system.
I looked at how the IPR rankings work and modified the formula a bit. The IPR formula generates more points for a position based on the number of entries. This is not a factor in our case, but I felt the formula could be modified to allow for a higher weigh for the S&G portion of RC.
Based on the 7 teams and my modified formula of
(5*((players per table/2))/(position^1.1)) we would end up with a points spread of 18/8/5/4/3/2/2.
Using the new scoring against the top 20 (with HU staying at 10), created some significant changes in position (e.g moose moved from 15th to 4th).
I am actually going to propose this for the next PSO league Moose.
Old New
Rank Rank Player Team
3 1 Mark P Guelph
1 2 Derek Ching
2 3 Sandy Fish
15 4 Moose Waterloo
6 5 Dead Money Kitchener
9 6 Jen Guelph
11 7 JHJ Ching
5 8 Mike Guelph
12 9 Tyson HBK
13 10 Mark Milton
16 11 Mandy Kitchener
8 12 Gary Ching
4 13 Terra Fish
10 14 Wes Waterloo
7 15 Bob Milton
14 16 Jeff Ching
19 17 BBC Kitchener
20 18 Jeremy Guelph
18 19 Will Waterloo
17 20 Greg (g2) Milton
Isn't this forum full of like students and math geeks? Where's my damn proof already? It's gotta be when you apply this strucuture to a bell curve distribution..
Ahh I already worked it out. Do we need to work on our reading comprehension as well?
Comments
Yeah nothing personal.
I was just agreeing that the points for HU seem a little high and other think it is low.
If anything I rather they stay the same then change because the change I perceive would only be a few points +/- here or there.
I'll throw my 2 cents in here for some discussion and not a knock at the current system.
I looked at how the IPR rankings work and modified the formula a bit. The IPR formula generates more points for a position based on the number of entries. This is not a factor in our case, but I felt the formula could be modified to allow for a higher weigh for the S&G portion of RC.
Based on the 7 teams and my modified formula of
(5*((players per table/2))/(position^1.1)) we would end up with a points spread of 18/8/5/4/3/2/2.
Using the new scoring against the top 20 (with HU staying at 10), created some significant changes in position (e.g moose moved from 15th to 4th).
I am actually going to propose this for the next PSO league Moose.
Old New
Rank Rank Player Team
3 1 Mark P Guelph
1 2 Derek Ching
2 3 Sandy Fish
15 4 Moose Waterloo
6 5 Dead Money Kitchener
9 6 Jen Guelph
11 7 JHJ Ching
5 8 Mike Guelph
12 9 Tyson HBK
13 10 Mark Milton
16 11 Mandy Kitchener
8 12 Gary Ching
4 13 Terra Fish
10 14 Wes Waterloo
7 15 Bob Milton
14 16 Jeff Ching
19 17 BBC Kitchener
20 18 Jeremy Guelph
18 19 Will Waterloo
17 20 Greg (g2) Milton
Ahh I already worked it out. Do we need to work on our reading comprehension as well?